[新聞] 補教師嗆洪慈庸:搞不清狀況!藝人也應推實名制消失
補教師嗆洪慈庸:搞不清狀況!藝人也應推實名制
2017-05-03 22:18聯合報 記者張錦弘╱即時報導
立委洪慈庸將推動修正補教法,讓補教老師改「實名制」,用真名上課,但真能杜絕性侵或
誘姦案嗎?很多補教業者及老師反嗆,根本沒必然關係,否則學校老師都用真名,性侵女學
生案為何仍層出不窮?且公平起見,藝人以後是否也要用真名?
北市補教協會總幹事張浩然指出,補習班負責人及教職員真名目前本來就要呈報主管機關;
且不是改用真名,就不會發生案件,像學校老師都用真名,但校園性侵案從未斷過,不見得
會比補教界少。
張浩然說,補習班業者其實比家長更擔心老師發生醜聞,一旦曝光,補習班就完蛋了,老師
用「藝名」累積多年的聲望,也馬上毀了,不是換個名字就能生存;他建議加重刑罰更有效
。
國文補教老師楊墨也呼應張浩然,指補教老師畢業校系、真名本來就要由教育局處列冊存檔
,有性侵等前科者也不能任教,立委擬修法改實名制,是不了解狀況、畫蛇添足、多此一舉
,且演藝圈是否比照辦理?
一直用真名開英語家教班的路呈麟則表示,自殺的女作家到底被哪個補教老師誘姦,案情根
本還沒釐清,警方也未接獲報案,不能因單一特殊個案而讓所有補教老師被抹黑、影射為「
狼師」,立委不用急著修法推實名制;但補教業者也要加強管理,例如他就禁止家教班的老
師和學生交換電話或LINE、也不能私下約見面,但任何地區、任何職業,一定有害群之馬,
仍防不勝防,不是改用真名就能杜絕狼師。
https://udn.com/news/story/11093/2441460?from=udn-ch1_breaknews-1-0-news
--
給妳2億
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.226.144.155
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1493849283.A.2E4.html
→
05/04 06:11, , 1F
05/04 06:11, 1F
→
05/04 06:11, , 2F
05/04 06:11, 2F
→
05/04 06:12, , 3F
05/04 06:12, 3F
推
05/04 06:14, , 4F
05/04 06:14, 4F
推
05/04 06:14, , 5F
05/04 06:14, 5F
→
05/04 06:14, , 6F
05/04 06:14, 6F
推
05/04 06:15, , 7F
05/04 06:15, 7F
推
05/04 06:15, , 8F
05/04 06:15, 8F
推
05/04 06:21, , 9F
05/04 06:21, 9F
→
05/04 06:22, , 10F
05/04 06:22, 10F
推
05/04 06:22, , 11F
05/04 06:22, 11F
推
05/04 06:23, , 12F
05/04 06:23, 12F
推
05/04 06:26, , 13F
05/04 06:26, 13F
推
05/04 06:28, , 14F
05/04 06:28, 14F
推
05/04 06:31, , 15F
05/04 06:31, 15F
推
05/04 06:33, , 16F
05/04 06:33, 16F
推
05/04 06:33, , 17F
05/04 06:33, 17F
→
05/04 06:33, , 18F
05/04 06:33, 18F
推
05/04 06:35, , 19F
05/04 06:35, 19F
噓
05/04 06:35, , 20F
05/04 06:35, 20F
→
05/04 06:37, , 21F
05/04 06:37, 21F
推
05/04 06:37, , 22F
05/04 06:37, 22F
推
05/04 06:38, , 23F
05/04 06:38, 23F
推
05/04 06:38, , 24F
05/04 06:38, 24F
→
05/04 06:38, , 25F
05/04 06:38, 25F
推
05/04 06:39, , 26F
05/04 06:39, 26F
噓
05/04 06:40, , 27F
05/04 06:40, 27F
→
05/04 06:40, , 28F
05/04 06:40, 28F
→
05/04 06:40, , 29F
05/04 06:40, 29F
推
05/04 06:42, , 30F
05/04 06:42, 30F
→
05/04 06:43, , 31F
05/04 06:43, 31F
推
05/04 06:45, , 32F
05/04 06:45, 32F
推
05/04 06:45, , 33F
05/04 06:45, 33F
→
05/04 06:46, , 34F
05/04 06:46, 34F
→
05/04 06:47, , 35F
05/04 06:47, 35F
→
05/04 06:49, , 36F
05/04 06:49, 36F
推
05/04 06:50, , 37F
05/04 06:50, 37F
→
05/04 06:50, , 38F
05/04 06:50, 38F
推
05/04 06:51, , 39F
05/04 06:51, 39F
還有 206 則推文
推
05/04 11:29, , 246F
05/04 11:29, 246F
推
05/04 11:30, , 247F
05/04 11:30, 247F
推
05/04 11:35, , 248F
05/04 11:35, 248F
推
05/04 11:37, , 249F
05/04 11:37, 249F
推
05/04 11:37, , 250F
05/04 11:37, 250F
推
05/04 11:40, , 251F
05/04 11:40, 251F
推
05/04 11:41, , 252F
05/04 11:41, 252F
推
05/04 11:51, , 253F
05/04 11:51, 253F
推
05/04 11:52, , 254F
05/04 11:52, 254F
推
05/04 11:55, , 255F
05/04 11:55, 255F
推
05/04 11:56, , 256F
05/04 11:56, 256F
推
05/04 12:03, , 257F
05/04 12:03, 257F
推
05/04 12:21, , 258F
05/04 12:21, 258F
推
05/04 12:21, , 259F
05/04 12:21, 259F
噓
05/04 12:22, , 260F
05/04 12:22, 260F
推
05/04 12:26, , 261F
05/04 12:26, 261F
推
05/04 12:34, , 262F
05/04 12:34, 262F
推
05/04 12:47, , 263F
05/04 12:47, 263F
推
05/04 12:53, , 264F
05/04 12:53, 264F
推
05/04 13:12, , 265F
05/04 13:12, 265F
推
05/04 13:33, , 266F
05/04 13:33, 266F
噓
05/04 14:25, , 267F
05/04 14:25, 267F
噓
05/04 16:32, , 268F
05/04 16:32, 268F
噓
05/04 17:10, , 269F
05/04 17:10, 269F
推
05/04 17:16, , 270F
05/04 17:16, 270F
噓
05/04 18:23, , 271F
05/04 18:23, 271F
推
05/04 19:05, , 272F
05/04 19:05, 272F
推
05/04 20:51, , 273F
05/04 20:51, 273F
推
05/04 21:06, , 274F
05/04 21:06, 274F
推
05/04 21:51, , 275F
05/04 21:51, 275F
推
05/04 23:39, , 276F
05/04 23:39, 276F
推
05/04 23:50, , 277F
05/04 23:50, 277F
推
05/04 23:50, , 278F
05/04 23:50, 278F
推
05/04 23:50, , 279F
05/04 23:50, 279F
噓
05/05 00:37, , 280F
05/05 00:37, 280F
推
05/05 03:13, , 281F
05/05 03:13, 281F
→
05/05 14:06, , 282F
05/05 14:06, 282F
推
05/05 20:17, , 283F
05/05 20:17, 283F
推
05/07 19:10, , 284F
05/07 19:10, 284F
噓
09/09 05:34, , 285F
09/09 05:34, 285F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 11 篇):