[新聞] 補教師嗆洪慈庸:搞不清狀況!藝人也應推實名制消失
1.媒體來源:
UDN
2.完整新聞標題:
補教師嗆洪慈庸:搞不清狀況!藝人也應推實名制
3.完整新聞內文:
立委洪慈庸將推動修正補教法,讓補教老師改「實名制」,用真名上課,但真能杜絕性侵
或誘姦案嗎?很多補教業者及老師反嗆,根本沒必然關係,否則學校老師都用真名,性侵
女學生案為何仍層出不窮?且公平起見,藝人以後是否也要用真名?
北市補教協會總幹事張浩然指出,補習班負責人及教職員真名目前本來就要呈報主管機關
;且不是改用真名,就不會發生案件,像學校老師都用真名,但校園性侵案從未斷過,不
見得會比補教界少。
張浩然說,補習班業者其實比家長更擔心老師發生醜聞,一旦曝光,補習班就完蛋了,老
師用「藝名」累積多年的聲望,也馬上毀了,不是換個名字就能生存;他建議加重刑罰更
有效。
國文補教老師楊墨也呼應張浩然,指補教老師畢業校系、真名本來就要由教育局處列冊存
檔,有性侵等前科者也不能任教,立委擬修法改實名制,是不了解狀況、畫蛇添足、多此
一舉,且演藝圈是否比照辦理?
一直用真名開英語家教班的路呈麟則表示,自殺的女作家到底被哪個補教老師誘姦,案情
根本還沒釐清,警方也未接獲報案,不能因單一特殊個案而讓所有補教老師被抹黑、影射
為「狼師」,立委不用急著修法推實名制;但補教業者也要加強管理,例如他就禁止家教
班的老師和學生交換電話或LINE、也不能私下約見面,但任何地區、任何職業,一定有害
群之馬,仍防不勝防,不是改用真名就能杜絕狼師。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
https://udn.com/news/story/11093/2441460?from=udn-ch1_breaknews-1-99-news
5.備註:
一說要推實名制就急的跳腳還把其他人也推落水 是有這麼緊張嗎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.228.154.97
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1493825700.A.75B.html
→
05/03 23:35, , 1F
05/03 23:35, 1F
→
05/03 23:35, , 2F
05/03 23:35, 2F
推
05/03 23:35, , 3F
05/03 23:35, 3F
→
05/03 23:35, , 4F
05/03 23:35, 4F
推
05/03 23:35, , 5F
05/03 23:35, 5F
推
05/03 23:35, , 6F
05/03 23:35, 6F
推
05/03 23:35, , 7F
05/03 23:35, 7F
推
05/03 23:36, , 8F
05/03 23:36, 8F
噓
05/03 23:36, , 9F
05/03 23:36, 9F
推
05/03 23:36, , 10F
05/03 23:36, 10F
推
05/03 23:36, , 11F
05/03 23:36, 11F
推
05/03 23:36, , 12F
05/03 23:36, 12F
→
05/03 23:36, , 13F
05/03 23:36, 13F
推
05/03 23:36, , 14F
05/03 23:36, 14F
噓
05/03 23:36, , 15F
05/03 23:36, 15F
→
05/03 23:36, , 16F
05/03 23:36, 16F
推
05/03 23:36, , 17F
05/03 23:36, 17F
推
05/03 23:36, , 18F
05/03 23:36, 18F
→
05/03 23:37, , 19F
05/03 23:37, 19F
→
05/03 23:37, , 20F
05/03 23:37, 20F
→
05/03 23:37, , 21F
05/03 23:37, 21F
→
05/03 23:37, , 22F
05/03 23:37, 22F
推
05/03 23:37, , 23F
05/03 23:37, 23F
推
05/03 23:37, , 24F
05/03 23:37, 24F
→
05/03 23:37, , 25F
05/03 23:37, 25F
→
05/03 23:37, , 26F
05/03 23:37, 26F
→
05/03 23:37, , 27F
05/03 23:37, 27F
推
05/03 23:37, , 28F
05/03 23:37, 28F
→
05/03 23:37, , 29F
05/03 23:37, 29F
推
05/03 23:38, , 30F
05/03 23:38, 30F
推
05/03 23:38, , 31F
05/03 23:38, 31F
→
05/03 23:38, , 32F
05/03 23:38, 32F
推
05/03 23:38, , 33F
05/03 23:38, 33F
→
05/03 23:38, , 34F
05/03 23:38, 34F
→
05/03 23:38, , 35F
05/03 23:38, 35F
→
05/03 23:38, , 36F
05/03 23:38, 36F
推
05/03 23:38, , 37F
05/03 23:38, 37F
噓
05/03 23:38, , 38F
05/03 23:38, 38F
噓
05/03 23:38, , 39F
05/03 23:38, 39F
還有 909 則推文
推
05/04 10:29, , 949F
05/04 10:29, 949F
推
05/04 10:31, , 950F
05/04 10:31, 950F
→
05/04 10:45, , 951F
05/04 10:45, 951F
推
05/04 10:46, , 952F
05/04 10:46, 952F
推
05/04 10:55, , 953F
05/04 10:55, 953F
推
05/04 10:58, , 954F
05/04 10:58, 954F
推
05/04 11:12, , 955F
05/04 11:12, 955F
推
05/04 11:16, , 956F
05/04 11:16, 956F
推
05/04 11:19, , 957F
05/04 11:19, 957F
→
05/04 11:20, , 958F
05/04 11:20, 958F
推
05/04 11:23, , 959F
05/04 11:23, 959F
推
05/04 11:23, , 960F
05/04 11:23, 960F
推
05/04 11:45, , 961F
05/04 11:45, 961F
推
05/04 11:49, , 962F
05/04 11:49, 962F
推
05/04 11:54, , 963F
05/04 11:54, 963F
推
05/04 12:10, , 964F
05/04 12:10, 964F
推
05/04 12:17, , 965F
05/04 12:17, 965F
推
05/04 12:24, , 966F
05/04 12:24, 966F
推
05/04 12:27, , 967F
05/04 12:27, 967F
→
05/04 12:29, , 968F
05/04 12:29, 968F
推
05/04 12:32, , 969F
05/04 12:32, 969F
推
05/04 12:33, , 970F
05/04 12:33, 970F
推
05/04 12:58, , 971F
05/04 12:58, 971F
推
05/04 13:21, , 972F
05/04 13:21, 972F
推
05/04 14:34, , 973F
05/04 14:34, 973F
噓
05/04 16:13, , 974F
05/04 16:13, 974F
→
05/04 16:17, , 975F
05/04 16:17, 975F
→
05/04 16:17, , 976F
05/04 16:17, 976F
→
05/04 16:17, , 977F
05/04 16:17, 977F
→
05/04 16:18, , 978F
05/04 16:18, 978F
→
05/04 16:18, , 979F
05/04 16:18, 979F
推
05/04 16:31, , 980F
05/04 16:31, 980F
噓
05/04 16:43, , 981F
05/04 16:43, 981F
→
05/04 17:12, , 982F
05/04 17:12, 982F
推
05/04 17:32, , 983F
05/04 17:32, 983F
推
05/04 18:32, , 984F
05/04 18:32, 984F
推
05/04 19:03, , 985F
05/04 19:03, 985F
推
05/04 19:10, , 986F
05/04 19:10, 986F
推
05/04 23:24, , 987F
05/04 23:24, 987F
推
05/05 06:52, , 988F
05/05 06:52, 988F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 21 篇):