[新聞] 90分鐘台北能到高雄 但屏東人可能還在等車...消失
1.媒體來源:
聯合
2.完整新聞標題:
90分鐘台北能到高雄 但屏東人可能還在等車...
3.完整新聞內文:
90分鐘可以做什麼?立委周春米昨天在臉書上指出「90分鐘可以搭高鐵從台北到高雄,也
可以搭台鐵從高雄到台東,但屏東人的90分鐘可能只是等待下一班車」,南北的差距就在
於交通建設的完善,中央不該再漠視。
最近行政院公布前瞻計畫後,高鐵南延屏東只列了800萬元的規劃費,再度引起屏東人不
平,立委蘇震清、周春米相繼在立法院發聲,大聲疾呼中央看見屏東的需求。
周春米並把立院質詢的過程寫在臉書上,表達屏東人的不平,她在臉書上指出,屏東縣長
期交通建設落後,第一條高速公路未到屏東,第二條只到林邊,東西向快速道路只來半條
,鐵路電氣化也還在走最後一哩路,屏東是六都之外、人口僅次於彰化的第二大縣…唯有
高速路網能調整失衡的發展。
她並以90分鐘做比喻,台北人的90分鐘,能搭高鐵到高雄,也能搭台鐵從高雄到台東,但
屏東周邊鄉鎮民眾的90分鐘,可能只是在等待下一班列車,失衡的交通建設,亟需中央彌
平。
近來很多人對高鐵南延屏東有不同看法,有些人甚至認為不具急迫性,但她特別引前屏東
縣長蘇貞昌在臉書上論述高鐵南延屏東的觀察:「台北市南京東路也曾只是一片水田」,
期待貫徹「晚做不如早做」,高鐵南延終能實現
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
https://goo.gl/JPkzUV
5.備註:
不說別的,連南迴鐵路電氣化都要109年以後才有可能完工(不拖延的話),
而且南迴鐵路到現在還是單軌.........
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.47.93.41
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1490759188.A.9E3.html
→
03/29 11:46, , 1F
03/29 11:46, 1F
推
03/29 11:47, , 2F
03/29 11:47, 2F
推
03/29 11:47, , 3F
03/29 11:47, 3F
推
03/29 11:47, , 4F
03/29 11:47, 4F
→
03/29 11:47, , 5F
03/29 11:47, 5F
推
03/29 11:47, , 6F
03/29 11:47, 6F
噓
03/29 11:47, , 7F
03/29 11:47, 7F
噓
03/29 11:47, , 8F
03/29 11:47, 8F
→
03/29 11:48, , 9F
03/29 11:48, 9F
推
03/29 11:48, , 10F
03/29 11:48, 10F
噓
03/29 11:48, , 11F
03/29 11:48, 11F
這個立委是指南迴線電氣化完工後,也就是109年完工後,台鐵預估的最快行車時間,
因為現行南迴沒有電氣化,只能用柴油動力車輛。
推
03/29 11:48, , 12F
03/29 11:48, 12F
推
03/29 11:48, , 13F
03/29 11:48, 13F
推
03/29 11:48, , 14F
03/29 11:48, 14F
→
03/29 11:48, , 15F
03/29 11:48, 15F
噓
03/29 11:48, , 16F
03/29 11:48, 16F
→
03/29 11:48, , 17F
03/29 11:48, 17F
推
03/29 11:48, , 18F
03/29 11:48, 18F
阿,就一邊過去後,換另一邊的過來啊,
所以一天屏東到台東雙向才各14班(從早上5點半到晚上8點半,再晚就沒車了)
平均候車大概1個半至2小時。
噓
03/29 11:48, , 19F
03/29 11:48, 19F
→
03/29 11:48, , 20F
03/29 11:48, 20F
推
03/29 11:48, , 21F
03/29 11:48, 21F
噓
03/29 11:48, , 22F
03/29 11:48, 22F
推
03/29 11:48, , 23F
03/29 11:48, 23F
推
03/29 11:49, , 24F
03/29 11:49, 24F
推
03/29 11:49, , 25F
03/29 11:49, 25F
推
03/29 11:49, , 26F
03/29 11:49, 26F
噓
03/29 11:49, , 27F
03/29 11:49, 27F
噓
03/29 11:49, , 28F
03/29 11:49, 28F
噓
03/29 11:49, , 29F
03/29 11:49, 29F
→
03/29 11:49, , 30F
03/29 11:49, 30F
噓
03/29 11:49, , 31F
03/29 11:49, 31F
噓
03/29 11:49, , 32F
03/29 11:49, 32F
→
03/29 11:49, , 33F
03/29 11:49, 33F
噓
03/29 11:49, , 34F
03/29 11:49, 34F
→
03/29 11:49, , 35F
03/29 11:49, 35F
→
03/29 11:50, , 36F
03/29 11:50, 36F
推
03/29 11:50, , 37F
03/29 11:50, 37F
→
03/29 11:50, , 38F
03/29 11:50, 38F
噓
03/29 11:50, , 39F
03/29 11:50, 39F
推
03/29 11:50, , 40F
03/29 11:50, 40F
→
03/29 11:50, , 41F
03/29 11:50, 41F
→
03/29 11:50, , 42F
03/29 11:50, 42F
噓
03/29 11:50, , 43F
03/29 11:50, 43F
推
03/29 11:50, , 44F
03/29 11:50, 44F
噓
03/29 11:51, , 45F
03/29 11:51, 45F
→
03/29 11:51, , 46F
03/29 11:51, 46F
推
03/29 11:51, , 47F
03/29 11:51, 47F
推
03/29 11:51, , 48F
03/29 11:51, 48F
→
03/29 11:51, , 49F
03/29 11:51, 49F
→
03/29 11:51, , 50F
03/29 11:51, 50F
推
03/29 11:51, , 51F
03/29 11:51, 51F
推
03/29 11:52, , 52F
03/29 11:52, 52F
→
03/29 11:53, , 53F
03/29 11:53, 53F
→
03/29 11:56, , 54F
03/29 11:56, 54F
→
03/29 11:57, , 55F
03/29 11:57, 55F
→
03/29 11:57, , 56F
03/29 11:57, 56F
噓
03/29 11:57, , 57F
03/29 11:57, 57F
→
03/29 11:57, , 58F
03/29 11:57, 58F
→
03/29 11:59, , 59F
03/29 11:59, 59F
推
03/29 12:00, , 60F
03/29 12:00, 60F
噓
03/29 12:00, , 61F
03/29 12:00, 61F
噓
03/29 12:00, , 62F
03/29 12:00, 62F
推
03/29 12:00, , 63F
03/29 12:00, 63F
噓
03/29 12:00, , 64F
03/29 12:00, 64F
噓
03/29 12:01, , 65F
03/29 12:01, 65F
※ 編輯: voyagerking (114.47.93.41), 03/29/2017 12:05:00
推
03/29 12:04, , 66F
03/29 12:04, 66F
推
03/29 12:06, , 67F
03/29 12:06, 67F
→
03/29 12:07, , 68F
03/29 12:07, 68F
噓
03/29 12:11, , 69F
03/29 12:11, 69F
噓
03/29 12:15, , 70F
03/29 12:15, 70F
推
03/29 12:16, , 71F
03/29 12:16, 71F
噓
03/29 12:18, , 72F
03/29 12:18, 72F
噓
03/29 12:18, , 73F
03/29 12:18, 73F
推
03/29 12:28, , 74F
03/29 12:28, 74F
→
03/29 12:36, , 75F
03/29 12:36, 75F
→
03/29 12:36, , 76F
03/29 12:36, 76F
噓
03/29 12:37, , 77F
03/29 12:37, 77F
→
03/29 12:38, , 78F
03/29 12:38, 78F
噓
03/29 12:48, , 79F
03/29 12:48, 79F
噓
03/29 12:48, , 80F
03/29 12:48, 80F
推
03/29 13:56, , 81F
03/29 13:56, 81F
→
03/29 13:56, , 82F
03/29 13:56, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):