[新聞] 打了怎統治? 彭明敏:中國攻台等同自殺消失
自由時報
「打了怎麼統治?」 彭明敏:中國攻台等同自殺
〔即時新聞/綜合報導〕
兩岸關係近來緊張,中國不時傳出「武統」台灣的言論。前總統府資政彭明敏認為,中國
攻打台灣可能會讓自己的政權垮台,直言這是「自殺式」的作法。
根據《民報》報導,彭明敏在今日下午出席《寫給台灣的備忘錄-彭明敏教授文集》發表
會,被問及敏感的兩岸問題,彭明敏表示「武力攻台不可能」。
彭明敏解釋,中國在軍事和宣傳上對台灣的威脅非常大,但他不認為中國可以攻打台灣,
因為這可能會使得中共政權垮台。彭明敏強調,這並非無法預料的,「中國人自殺式攻台
灣,拿下台灣之後要如何統治?台灣是它能統治的嗎?光是說動武能怎樣?」、「不是說
打了台灣就沒事,和美國的關係要怎麼辦?」
話雖如此,彭明敏仍提醒,攻台論也是在考驗台灣人的決心,若政府不斷向中國讓步,甚
至是一些沒必要的讓步,台灣人就要有決心維持民主自由人權,要將決心表現給全世界看
,政府也要敢要求國民犧牲,不能只說好聽的話,敢要求國民犧牲的政府,才是真的愛台
灣的政府。
https://goo.gl/JEZ3ZN
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.160.49.245
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1489226025.A.799.html
※ 編輯: Wojnarowski (118.160.49.245), 03/11/2017 17:54:04
→
03/11 17:54, , 1F
03/11 17:54, 1F
噓
03/11 17:54, , 2F
03/11 17:54, 2F
噓
03/11 17:54, , 3F
03/11 17:54, 3F
→
03/11 17:54, , 4F
03/11 17:54, 4F
噓
03/11 17:54, , 5F
03/11 17:54, 5F
→
03/11 17:54, , 6F
03/11 17:54, 6F
→
03/11 17:55, , 7F
03/11 17:55, 7F
推
03/11 17:55, , 8F
03/11 17:55, 8F
噓
03/11 17:56, , 9F
03/11 17:56, 9F
→
03/11 17:57, , 10F
03/11 17:57, 10F
→
03/11 17:57, , 11F
03/11 17:57, 11F
→
03/11 17:58, , 12F
03/11 17:58, 12F
噓
03/11 17:58, , 13F
03/11 17:58, 13F
→
03/11 17:59, , 14F
03/11 17:59, 14F
噓
03/11 17:59, , 15F
03/11 17:59, 15F
→
03/11 17:59, , 16F
03/11 17:59, 16F
噓
03/11 18:00, , 17F
03/11 18:00, 17F
推
03/11 18:03, , 18F
03/11 18:03, 18F
噓
03/11 18:17, , 19F
03/11 18:17, 19F
→
03/11 18:22, , 20F
03/11 18:22, 20F
→
03/11 18:24, , 21F
03/11 18:24, 21F
推
03/11 18:34, , 22F
03/11 18:34, 22F
噓
03/11 18:37, , 23F
03/11 18:37, 23F
噓
03/11 18:37, , 24F
03/11 18:37, 24F
噓
03/11 18:40, , 25F
03/11 18:40, 25F
噓
03/11 18:40, , 26F
03/11 18:40, 26F
推
03/11 18:40, , 27F
03/11 18:40, 27F
推
03/11 18:41, , 28F
03/11 18:41, 28F
→
03/11 18:42, , 29F
03/11 18:42, 29F
噓
03/11 18:43, , 30F
03/11 18:43, 30F
→
03/11 18:44, , 31F
03/11 18:44, 31F
→
03/11 18:46, , 32F
03/11 18:46, 32F
→
03/11 18:46, , 33F
03/11 18:46, 33F
推
03/11 18:47, , 34F
03/11 18:47, 34F
推
03/11 18:49, , 35F
03/11 18:49, 35F
噓
03/11 18:50, , 36F
03/11 18:50, 36F
推
03/11 18:50, , 37F
03/11 18:50, 37F
→
03/11 18:51, , 38F
03/11 18:51, 38F
推
03/11 18:51, , 39F
03/11 18:51, 39F
推
03/11 18:52, , 40F
03/11 18:52, 40F
→
03/11 18:53, , 41F
03/11 18:53, 41F
噓
03/11 18:56, , 42F
03/11 18:56, 42F
推
03/11 18:56, , 43F
03/11 18:56, 43F
推
03/11 19:00, , 44F
03/11 19:00, 44F
推
03/11 19:02, , 45F
03/11 19:02, 45F
→
03/11 19:03, , 46F
03/11 19:03, 46F
→
03/11 19:03, , 47F
03/11 19:03, 47F
推
03/11 19:05, , 48F
03/11 19:05, 48F
噓
03/11 19:06, , 49F
03/11 19:06, 49F
推
03/11 19:07, , 50F
03/11 19:07, 50F
推
03/11 19:09, , 51F
03/11 19:09, 51F
推
03/11 19:09, , 52F
03/11 19:09, 52F
推
03/11 19:10, , 53F
03/11 19:10, 53F
噓
03/11 19:26, , 54F
03/11 19:26, 54F
→
03/11 19:32, , 55F
03/11 19:32, 55F
→
03/11 19:32, , 56F
03/11 19:32, 56F
→
03/11 19:32, , 57F
03/11 19:32, 57F
推
03/11 19:38, , 58F
03/11 19:38, 58F
噓
03/11 21:19, , 59F
03/11 21:19, 59F
→
03/11 21:20, , 60F
03/11 21:20, 60F
→
03/11 22:32, , 61F
03/11 22:32, 61F
推
03/11 22:52, , 62F
03/11 22:52, 62F
→
03/11 22:55, , 63F
03/11 22:55, 63F
→
03/11 22:56, , 64F
03/11 22:56, 64F
→
03/11 23:13, , 65F
03/11 23:13, 65F
→
03/11 23:30, , 66F
03/11 23:30, 66F
推
03/12 00:18, , 67F
03/12 00:18, 67F
推
03/12 00:19, , 68F
03/12 00:19, 68F
推
03/12 00:19, , 69F
03/12 00:19, 69F
→
03/12 07:32, , 70F
03/12 07:32, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):