Re: [新聞] 「永不得捐血」 國內男同志遭歧視?!消失
我覺得平權是應該的,但捐血跟組成家庭領養小孩,試問
健康無虞的民眾為何要承擔風險,8成的愛滋病患是同性戀
是不爭的事實,為何同志患病比例高因為精液的病毒濃度高
跟共用針頭容易患病一樣因為血液也高
這呈現一個問題,為何同志爭取家庭濫交比例卻超乎尋常
既然要濫交這樣還需要婚姻幹什麼,你們在圈子裡怎麼樣
外人管不著,但血液要流通就是大家的事了,你們一句人權
就要全民承擔風險,有這種事嗎?
在談領養小孩,小孩子有沒有選擇要不要被領養的權利,今天
領養的是個嬰兒,他還不能思考就被強迫待在一個也不知道自己
能不能接受的家庭,而且有配套嗎,有愛滋病者不能領養嗎?
今天領養要有健康檢查包含傳染病檢驗
是不是又要跳出來說違反人權
這場運動以來同志只喊人權,但別人的人權呢?只要自己的人權
其他人都必須配合?都不能講句話嗎?好歹表現出一夫一妻的樣子
出來,好歹用幾年的時間來降低患病比例,這才是換取認同最實際
的方式,而不是強迫全民為了人權兩字買單,而這場運動人權根本
是假議題,試問台灣有同志沒人權的問題嗎?
根本沒有
※ 引述《A6 (短ID真好)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《brella (府城嚴選臭懶趴)》之銘言:
: : 新聞標題:「永不得捐血」 國內男同志遭歧視?!
: : 新聞來源:http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1133429
: 我覺得台灣的男同還敢說歧視
: 幾年前某版在宣傳秘技
: 那些爛甲捐血查愛滋捐血害人的時候有鳥過這個東西嗎?
: 明明爛甲亂玩系統 還要說成人家歧視
: 先降努力低男男之間的STD比例
: 當低到和和總人口STD平均值比例相當的時候再來討論是不是有歧視的問題
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.223.50.158
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1481437039.A.6E8.html
噓
12/11 14:17, , 1F
12/11 14:17, 1F
→
12/11 14:17, , 2F
12/11 14:17, 2F
推
12/11 14:18, , 3F
12/11 14:18, 3F
噓
12/11 14:18, , 4F
12/11 14:18, 4F
→
12/11 14:18, , 5F
12/11 14:18, 5F
→
12/11 14:19, , 6F
12/11 14:19, 6F
→
12/11 14:19, , 7F
12/11 14:19, 7F
噓
12/11 14:19, , 8F
12/11 14:19, 8F
噓
12/11 14:19, , 9F
12/11 14:19, 9F
推
12/11 14:20, , 10F
12/11 14:20, 10F
→
12/11 14:22, , 11F
12/11 14:22, 11F
噓
12/11 14:22, , 12F
12/11 14:22, 12F
推
12/11 14:24, , 13F
12/11 14:24, 13F
推
12/11 14:25, , 14F
12/11 14:25, 14F
→
12/11 14:25, , 15F
12/11 14:25, 15F
推
12/11 14:26, , 16F
12/11 14:26, 16F
推
12/11 14:26, , 17F
12/11 14:26, 17F
→
12/11 14:26, , 18F
12/11 14:26, 18F
→
12/11 14:27, , 19F
12/11 14:27, 19F
推
12/11 14:29, , 20F
12/11 14:29, 20F
推
12/11 14:29, , 21F
12/11 14:29, 21F
推
12/11 14:29, , 22F
12/11 14:29, 22F
推
12/11 14:30, , 23F
12/11 14:30, 23F
→
12/11 14:31, , 24F
12/11 14:31, 24F
推
12/11 14:33, , 25F
12/11 14:33, 25F
推
12/11 14:33, , 26F
12/11 14:33, 26F
推
12/11 14:35, , 27F
12/11 14:35, 27F
推
12/11 14:38, , 28F
12/11 14:38, 28F
推
12/11 14:39, , 29F
12/11 14:39, 29F
推
12/11 14:41, , 30F
12/11 14:41, 30F
※ 編輯: pininfarina (61.223.50.158), 12/11/2016 14:44:46
推
12/11 14:43, , 31F
12/11 14:43, 31F
→
12/11 14:43, , 32F
12/11 14:43, 32F
推
12/11 14:44, , 33F
12/11 14:44, 33F
→
12/11 14:46, , 34F
12/11 14:46, 34F
推
12/11 14:48, , 35F
12/11 14:48, 35F
推
12/11 14:51, , 36F
12/11 14:51, 36F
噓
12/11 14:52, , 37F
12/11 14:52, 37F
推
12/11 14:53, , 38F
12/11 14:53, 38F
推
12/11 14:56, , 39F
12/11 14:56, 39F
推
12/11 14:56, , 40F
12/11 14:56, 40F
推
12/11 14:58, , 41F
12/11 14:58, 41F
噓
12/11 14:58, , 42F
12/11 14:58, 42F
噓
12/11 14:59, , 43F
12/11 14:59, 43F
推
12/11 14:59, , 44F
12/11 14:59, 44F
推
12/11 15:00, , 45F
12/11 15:00, 45F
→
12/11 15:03, , 46F
12/11 15:03, 46F
→
12/11 15:04, , 47F
12/11 15:04, 47F
→
12/11 15:07, , 48F
12/11 15:07, 48F
→
12/11 15:07, , 49F
12/11 15:07, 49F
→
12/11 15:08, , 50F
12/11 15:08, 50F
推
12/11 15:19, , 51F
12/11 15:19, 51F
→
12/11 15:19, , 52F
12/11 15:19, 52F
噓
12/11 15:21, , 53F
12/11 15:21, 53F
推
12/11 15:27, , 54F
12/11 15:27, 54F
推
12/11 15:31, , 55F
12/11 15:31, 55F
噓
12/11 16:04, , 56F
12/11 16:04, 56F
推
12/11 16:27, , 57F
12/11 16:27, 57F
噓
12/11 16:49, , 58F
12/11 16:49, 58F
→
12/11 16:51, , 59F
12/11 16:51, 59F
推
12/11 16:58, , 60F
12/11 16:58, 60F
噓
12/11 17:20, , 61F
12/11 17:20, 61F
噓
12/11 17:36, , 62F
12/11 17:36, 62F
推
12/11 18:37, , 63F
12/11 18:37, 63F
推
12/11 19:00, , 64F
12/11 19:00, 64F
推
12/11 20:22, , 65F
12/11 20:22, 65F
推
12/11 21:57, , 66F
12/11 21:57, 66F
推
12/12 01:50, , 67F
12/12 01:50, 67F
推
12/12 01:50, , 68F
12/12 01:50, 68F
推
12/12 10:48, , 69F
12/12 10:48, 69F
→
12/12 22:49, , 70F
12/12 22:49, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 14 篇):