Re: [新聞] 立委批法務部同婚修法態度保守 邱太三:消失
※ 引述《delphi5566 (delphi)》之銘言:
: 本來就是立專法才是正解
: 同性團體就是硬要堅持修民法
: 還大言不慚說牴觸不會一條一條修喔
: 好像全民都欠你一樣
: 為了同性婚通姦難認定就要廢除通姦罪
: 從民法親屬篇一堆法條的夫妻,父母等字樣通通要改
: 身分證,戶政的欄位更改成本也是全民買單
: 本來不反對我現在也越來越反感
: 只要有意見的都被打成恐同
: 你們已經自我膨脹到盲腸突破天際了!
: 請問我們到底有欠你們什麼嗎?
: 邱太三提這個合理啊
: 繼前天那個想要父愛的小女孩
: 他會不會也要被打成恐同了啊?
很多LGBT朋友反對立專法,理由是把人區別是種歧視。
可是另立專法真的是歧視嗎?
請問「兒童與青少年福利法」是歧視兒童嗎?
不是!
「原住民基本法」是歧視原住民嗎?
不是!
事實上另立專法反到是一種保障。
在不影響原本法條訂定之目的為前提下,另立專法不僅比較快,而且對一般人的改變也比
較小。
民法是被很多法條所依據的根本大法,修改起來茲事體大,牽一髮而動全身,不是LGBT朋
友想的一條一條改那麼簡單。
另立專法,相較於直接粗暴地修改民法,整體而言更適合台灣社會,大多數人較不排斥,
LGBT朋友也更能理直氣壯、站的住腳。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.138.188.194
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1479007946.A.0D9.html
推
11/13 11:34, , 1F
11/13 11:34, 1F
噓
11/13 11:36, , 2F
11/13 11:36, 2F
噓
11/13 11:36, , 3F
11/13 11:36, 3F
→
11/13 11:37, , 4F
11/13 11:37, 4F
→
11/13 11:37, , 5F
11/13 11:37, 5F
推
11/13 11:38, , 6F
11/13 11:38, 6F
→
11/13 11:39, , 7F
11/13 11:39, 7F
→
11/13 11:39, , 8F
11/13 11:39, 8F
噓
11/13 11:39, , 9F
11/13 11:39, 9F
→
11/13 11:40, , 10F
11/13 11:40, 10F
推
11/13 11:42, , 11F
11/13 11:42, 11F
噓
11/13 11:42, , 12F
11/13 11:42, 12F
→
11/13 11:43, , 13F
11/13 11:43, 13F
→
11/13 11:43, , 14F
11/13 11:43, 14F
→
11/13 11:43, , 15F
11/13 11:43, 15F
→
11/13 11:44, , 16F
11/13 11:44, 16F
→
11/13 11:45, , 17F
11/13 11:45, 17F
→
11/13 11:46, , 18F
11/13 11:46, 18F
→
11/13 11:47, , 19F
11/13 11:47, 19F
→
11/13 11:49, , 20F
11/13 11:49, 20F
噓
11/13 11:49, , 21F
11/13 11:49, 21F
→
11/13 11:49, , 22F
11/13 11:49, 22F
→
11/13 11:50, , 23F
11/13 11:50, 23F
推
11/13 11:51, , 24F
11/13 11:51, 24F
→
11/13 11:54, , 25F
11/13 11:54, 25F
噓
11/13 11:54, , 26F
11/13 11:54, 26F
→
11/13 11:56, , 27F
11/13 11:56, 27F
→
11/13 11:57, , 28F
11/13 11:57, 28F
噓
11/13 12:00, , 29F
11/13 12:00, 29F
推
11/13 12:04, , 30F
11/13 12:04, 30F
推
11/13 12:06, , 31F
11/13 12:06, 31F
推
11/13 12:08, , 32F
11/13 12:08, 32F
→
11/13 12:09, , 33F
11/13 12:09, 33F
推
11/13 12:09, , 34F
11/13 12:09, 34F
→
11/13 12:10, , 35F
11/13 12:10, 35F
→
11/13 12:11, , 36F
11/13 12:11, 36F
推
11/13 12:14, , 37F
11/13 12:14, 37F
→
11/13 12:18, , 38F
11/13 12:18, 38F
→
11/13 12:26, , 39F
11/13 12:26, 39F
噓
11/13 12:27, , 40F
11/13 12:27, 40F
噓
11/13 12:28, , 41F
11/13 12:28, 41F
→
11/13 12:29, , 42F
11/13 12:29, 42F
推
11/13 12:33, , 43F
11/13 12:33, 43F
推
11/13 12:33, , 44F
11/13 12:33, 44F
→
11/13 12:34, , 45F
11/13 12:34, 45F
→
11/13 12:51, , 46F
11/13 12:51, 46F
→
11/13 12:54, , 47F
11/13 12:54, 47F
→
11/13 13:13, , 48F
11/13 13:13, 48F
→
11/13 13:13, , 49F
11/13 13:13, 49F
噓
11/13 13:58, , 50F
11/13 13:58, 50F
→
11/13 13:59, , 51F
11/13 13:59, 51F
→
11/13 13:59, , 52F
11/13 13:59, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 6 篇):