Re: [問卦] 中國跟台灣開戰是不是就屎定了?消失
中國根本不敢打台灣啦,射射飛彈、恐嚇兩句就是極限了
1.登陸戰太傷,基本上台灣北部適合登陸搶灘的點就那幾個
守好就不太可能搶灘成功
而且台灣酷愛放消波塊,只要放消波塊登陸搶灘就不可能
2.台灣防空密度世界第一
基本中低空上防空飛彈、對空機砲是打不太到飛機的,高空的我不懂,就不野人獻曝
中、低空防空是拿來打運輸機、直升機、空降部隊
看過打火雞?中國憤青最愛嘴的搶攻首都機場就是了
還沒到機場就先被打爆了,然後我當兵防空部,還有機密,想佔機場?不可能啦,吃屎比
較快
3.台灣只要緩慢進步,中國就要投入十倍、百倍資源應付
為什麼台灣國防工業不算弱?
因為對老美來說太划算了,讓中國亂花錢XD
默默就手滑了,懂?
※ 引述《G888888 ()》之銘言:
: 我個人認為啦
: 如果
: 中臺之戰開打
: 台灣必死,但是中國肯定要被台灣打成殘廢
: 這時候世界列強看在中國正殘的狀況
: 原本表面為了錢跟中國很好的國家 眼看機不可失
: 就開始吃中國的肉 控制中國政治 奴役中國勞工
: 繼續讓他們成為世界工廠 扶植民主政權
: 感覺中國打台灣不順變世界大戰就屎定了
: 也因為這樣中國根本不敢打台灣
: 有請兩岸鍵盤專家解答
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.65.174.134
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1477852667.A.979.html
→
10/31 02:38, , 1F
10/31 02:38, 1F
推
10/31 02:39, , 2F
10/31 02:39, 2F
推
10/31 02:41, , 3F
10/31 02:41, 3F
→
10/31 02:42, , 4F
10/31 02:42, 4F
推
10/31 02:42, , 5F
10/31 02:42, 5F
噓
10/31 02:42, , 6F
10/31 02:42, 6F
→
10/31 02:42, , 7F
10/31 02:42, 7F
推
10/31 02:43, , 8F
10/31 02:43, 8F
推
10/31 02:43, , 9F
10/31 02:43, 9F
噓
10/31 02:43, , 10F
10/31 02:43, 10F
推
10/31 02:43, , 11F
10/31 02:43, 11F
→
10/31 02:44, , 12F
10/31 02:44, 12F
推
10/31 02:45, , 13F
10/31 02:45, 13F
→
10/31 02:46, , 14F
10/31 02:46, 14F
推
10/31 02:47, , 15F
10/31 02:47, 15F
推
10/31 02:48, , 16F
10/31 02:48, 16F
噓
10/31 02:49, , 17F
10/31 02:49, 17F
推
10/31 02:49, , 18F
10/31 02:49, 18F
推
10/31 02:50, , 19F
10/31 02:50, 19F
→
10/31 02:51, , 20F
10/31 02:51, 20F
噓
10/31 02:52, , 21F
10/31 02:52, 21F
→
10/31 02:52, , 22F
10/31 02:52, 22F
推
10/31 02:53, , 23F
10/31 02:53, 23F
推
10/31 02:54, , 24F
10/31 02:54, 24F
推
10/31 02:55, , 25F
10/31 02:55, 25F
→
10/31 02:55, , 26F
10/31 02:55, 26F
推
10/31 02:56, , 27F
10/31 02:56, 27F
推
10/31 02:56, , 28F
10/31 02:56, 28F
推
10/31 02:56, , 29F
10/31 02:56, 29F
噓
10/31 02:57, , 30F
10/31 02:57, 30F
推
10/31 02:58, , 31F
10/31 02:58, 31F
推
10/31 02:58, , 32F
10/31 02:58, 32F
推
10/31 02:58, , 33F
10/31 02:58, 33F
→
10/31 02:58, , 34F
10/31 02:58, 34F
→
10/31 02:58, , 35F
10/31 02:58, 35F
推
10/31 02:59, , 36F
10/31 02:59, 36F
→
10/31 02:59, , 37F
10/31 02:59, 37F
→
10/31 02:59, , 38F
10/31 02:59, 38F
→
10/31 03:00, , 39F
10/31 03:00, 39F
還有 416 則推文
→
10/31 11:38, , 456F
10/31 11:38, 456F
→
10/31 11:40, , 457F
10/31 11:40, 457F
→
10/31 11:40, , 458F
10/31 11:40, 458F
推
10/31 12:14, , 459F
10/31 12:14, 459F
噓
10/31 12:33, , 460F
10/31 12:33, 460F
→
10/31 12:47, , 461F
10/31 12:47, 461F
推
10/31 12:51, , 462F
10/31 12:51, 462F
→
10/31 12:58, , 463F
10/31 12:58, 463F
→
10/31 12:59, , 464F
10/31 12:59, 464F
推
10/31 13:01, , 465F
10/31 13:01, 465F
噓
10/31 13:04, , 466F
10/31 13:04, 466F
推
10/31 13:23, , 467F
10/31 13:23, 467F
推
10/31 13:51, , 468F
10/31 13:51, 468F
推
10/31 14:01, , 469F
10/31 14:01, 469F
→
10/31 14:01, , 470F
10/31 14:01, 470F
→
10/31 14:02, , 471F
10/31 14:02, 471F
→
10/31 14:03, , 472F
10/31 14:03, 472F
推
10/31 14:05, , 473F
10/31 14:05, 473F
推
10/31 14:49, , 474F
10/31 14:49, 474F
→
10/31 14:49, , 475F
10/31 14:49, 475F
推
10/31 14:51, , 476F
10/31 14:51, 476F
推
10/31 15:21, , 477F
10/31 15:21, 477F
→
10/31 15:21, , 478F
10/31 15:21, 478F
推
10/31 15:36, , 479F
10/31 15:36, 479F
噓
10/31 15:58, , 480F
10/31 15:58, 480F
推
10/31 17:08, , 481F
10/31 17:08, 481F
噓
10/31 20:27, , 482F
10/31 20:27, 482F
→
10/31 20:28, , 483F
10/31 20:28, 483F
→
10/31 20:28, , 484F
10/31 20:28, 484F
→
10/31 20:29, , 485F
10/31 20:29, 485F
→
10/31 20:30, , 486F
10/31 20:30, 486F
推
10/31 20:43, , 487F
10/31 20:43, 487F
噓
10/31 20:54, , 488F
10/31 20:54, 488F
→
10/31 20:54, , 489F
10/31 20:54, 489F
推
10/31 21:39, , 490F
10/31 21:39, 490F
推
11/01 02:09, , 491F
11/01 02:09, 491F
推
11/01 08:05, , 492F
11/01 08:05, 492F
→
11/01 08:05, , 493F
11/01 08:05, 493F
推
11/01 09:31, , 494F
11/01 09:31, 494F
→
11/01 09:32, , 495F
11/01 09:32, 495F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 17 篇):