[問卦] 中華民國繼承清朝領土有錯嗎消失
台灣以前被清朝統治
中華民國繼承清朝
所以統治台灣
為什麼說是軍事佔領?
中華民國統治台灣有什麼不對?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 163.15.178.48
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1476161340.A.B45.html
→
10/11 12:49, , 1F
10/11 12:49, 1F
→
10/11 12:49, , 2F
10/11 12:49, 2F

→
10/11 12:50, , 3F
10/11 12:50, 3F
噓
10/11 12:50, , 4F
10/11 12:50, 4F
噓
10/11 12:50, , 5F
10/11 12:50, 5F
→
10/11 12:50, , 6F
10/11 12:50, 6F
→
10/11 12:50, , 7F
10/11 12:50, 7F
→
10/11 12:50, , 8F
10/11 12:50, 8F
噓
10/11 12:50, , 9F
10/11 12:50, 9F
噓
10/11 12:50, , 10F
10/11 12:50, 10F
→
10/11 12:50, , 11F
10/11 12:50, 11F
→
10/11 12:50, , 12F
10/11 12:50, 12F
推
10/11 12:50, , 13F
10/11 12:50, 13F
那是被武力強佔
而且二次大戰日本戰敗
馬關條約就無效了
→
10/11 12:51, , 14F
10/11 12:51, 14F
※ 編輯: kylinweapon (163.15.178.48), 10/11/2016 12:51:58
→
10/11 12:51, , 15F
10/11 12:51, 15F
→
10/11 12:51, , 16F
10/11 12:51, 16F
→
10/11 12:51, , 17F
10/11 12:51, 17F
噓
10/11 12:52, , 18F
10/11 12:52, 18F
→
10/11 12:52, , 19F
10/11 12:52, 19F
推
10/11 12:52, , 20F
10/11 12:52, 20F
推
10/11 12:52, , 21F
10/11 12:52, 21F
→
10/11 12:52, , 22F
10/11 12:52, 22F
推
10/11 12:53, , 23F
10/11 12:53, 23F
→
10/11 12:53, , 24F
10/11 12:53, 24F
噓
10/11 12:53, , 25F
10/11 12:53, 25F
→
10/11 12:53, , 26F
10/11 12:53, 26F
→
10/11 12:53, , 27F
10/11 12:53, 27F
噓
10/11 12:54, , 28F
10/11 12:54, 28F
→
10/11 12:54, , 29F
10/11 12:54, 29F
推
10/11 12:54, , 30F
10/11 12:54, 30F
→
10/11 12:54, , 31F
10/11 12:54, 31F
噓
10/11 12:55, , 32F
10/11 12:55, 32F
推
10/11 12:56, , 33F
10/11 12:56, 33F
噓
10/11 12:56, , 34F
10/11 12:56, 34F
二次大戰日本戰敗
就是宣告馬關條約無效
→
10/11 12:57, , 35F
10/11 12:57, 35F
噓
10/11 12:57, , 36F
10/11 12:57, 36F
還有 29 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
10/11 13:29, , 66F
10/11 13:29, 66F
→
10/11 13:29, , 67F
10/11 13:29, 67F
→
10/11 13:29, , 68F
10/11 13:29, 68F
→
10/11 13:29, , 69F
10/11 13:29, 69F
噓
10/11 13:31, , 70F
10/11 13:31, 70F
→
10/11 13:31, , 71F
10/11 13:31, 71F
噓
10/11 14:09, , 72F
10/11 14:09, 72F
→
10/11 14:10, , 73F
10/11 14:10, 73F
→
10/11 14:13, , 74F
10/11 14:13, 74F
→
10/11 14:13, , 75F
10/11 14:13, 75F
噓
10/11 14:16, , 76F
10/11 14:16, 76F
→
10/11 14:18, , 77F
10/11 14:18, 77F
→
10/11 14:22, , 78F
10/11 14:22, 78F
噓
10/11 15:00, , 79F
10/11 15:00, 79F
→
10/11 15:01, , 80F
10/11 15:01, 80F
→
10/11 15:02, , 81F
10/11 15:02, 81F
→
10/11 15:51, , 82F
10/11 15:51, 82F
噓
10/11 15:53, , 83F
10/11 15:53, 83F
噓
10/11 15:55, , 84F
10/11 15:55, 84F
噓
10/11 16:04, , 85F
10/11 16:04, 85F
→
10/11 16:04, , 86F
10/11 16:04, 86F
噓
10/11 17:06, , 87F
10/11 17:06, 87F
→
10/11 17:51, , 88F
10/11 17:51, 88F
→
10/11 17:52, , 89F
10/11 17:52, 89F
噓
10/11 17:57, , 90F
10/11 17:57, 90F
→
10/11 18:48, , 91F
10/11 18:48, 91F
→
10/11 18:50, , 92F
10/11 18:50, 92F
→
10/11 18:53, , 93F
10/11 18:53, 93F
→
10/11 18:55, , 94F
10/11 18:55, 94F
→
10/11 18:55, , 95F
10/11 18:55, 95F
→
10/11 18:57, , 96F
10/11 18:57, 96F
→
10/11 18:59, , 97F
10/11 18:59, 97F
→
10/11 19:02, , 98F
10/11 19:02, 98F
噓
10/11 19:12, , 99F
10/11 19:12, 99F
→
10/11 19:13, , 100F
10/11 19:13, 100F
→
10/11 19:13, , 101F
10/11 19:13, 101F
→
10/11 19:14, , 102F
10/11 19:14, 102F
噓
10/11 19:28, , 103F
10/11 19:28, 103F
噓
10/11 20:04, , 104F
10/11 20:04, 104F
→
10/11 20:04, , 105F
10/11 20:04, 105F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 21 篇):