[問卦] 勞工追求二例有好處嗎?消失
勞基法是要保護勞工條件最底層的人大家都知
勞動條件低的勞工大多寧願用時間來換金錢
現在極左派的狂推二例用意到底何在?
爭一口執政黨出爾反爾的氣?
一般人除了竹科大多早就朝九晚五根本沒影響,工時比起來說真的也沒其他亞洲國家高
要跟公務員平等又要多放那些政治不正確的假?
大家生氣的點是什麼?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 211.36.148.38
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1475870987.A.762.html
推
10/08 04:10, , 1F
10/08 04:10, 1F
黨工登入3000次也夠資深了吧
※ 編輯: sowachen (211.36.148.38), 10/08/2016 04:12:06
推
10/08 04:17, , 2F
10/08 04:17, 2F
修到40後或二例跟公務員一樣,七天假不是很站不住腳
推
10/08 04:20, , 3F
10/08 04:20, 3F
噓
10/08 04:22, , 4F
10/08 04:22, 4F
那你追求什麼?
推
10/08 04:28, , 5F
10/08 04:28, 5F
推
, , 6F
10/08 04:29
但那七天實際是早就虛設的假,本來週六要上半天後來不放這七天抵掉,一年26天只抵7
天就算不能以時代日也沒吃虧啊,況且七天裡面有國父.光復.蔣公平常左派最鄙視現在為
了放提都不提?
噓
10/08 04:29, , 7F
10/08 04:29, 7F
→
10/08 04:30, , 8F
10/08 04:30, 8F
→
10/08 04:30, , 9F
10/08 04:30, 9F
那跟二例七天假是兩件事不是嗎?
※ 編輯: sowachen (211.36.148.38), 10/08/2016 04:37:10
※ 編輯: sowachen (211.36.148.38), 10/08/2016 04:45:30
→
10/08 04:42, , 10F
10/08 04:42, 10F
推 A80211ab: 多陪家人子女 減少社會問題不好嗎? 10/08 04:44
→
10/08 04:44, , 11F
10/08 04:44, 11F
→
10/08 04:44, , 12F
10/08 04:44, 12F
推
10/08 04:44, , 13F
10/08 04:44, 13F
→
10/08 04:44, , 14F
10/08 04:44, 14F
→
10/08 04:45, , 15F
10/08 04:45, 15F
→
10/08 04:45, , 16F
10/08 04:45, 16F
勞動條件低代表容易取代,人事成本變高老闆乾脆找假日兼職不是更划算?又不是休了真
的領的到
※ 編輯: sowachen (211.36.148.38), 10/08/2016 04:47:58
→
10/08 04:46, , 17F
10/08 04:46, 17F
→
10/08 04:46, , 18F
10/08 04:46, 18F
→
10/08 04:47, , 19F
10/08 04:47, 19F
→
10/08 04:47, , 20F
10/08 04:47, 20F
推
10/08 04:47, , 21F
10/08 04:47, 21F
→
10/08 04:48, , 22F
10/08 04:48, 22F
→
10/08 04:48, , 23F
10/08 04:48, 23F
→
10/08 04:49, , 24F
10/08 04:49, 24F
→
10/08 04:49, , 25F
10/08 04:49, 25F
有執照的也許難找,但勞力密集不代表兼職做不來,搞不好同行直接互相支援躲工時,老
闆叫你去代班或直接無薪假你選哪個?
※ 編輯: sowachen (211.36.148.38), 10/08/2016 04:53:06
→
, , 26F
→
10/08 04:50, , 27F
10/08 04:50, 27F
推
10/08 04:50, , 28F
10/08 04:50, 28F
→
10/08 04:50, , 29F
10/08 04:50, 29F
→
10/08 04:51, , 30F
10/08 04:51, 30F
→
10/08 04:51, , 31F
10/08 04:51, 31F
還有 58 則推文
還有 13 段內文
推
10/08 08:07, , 90F
10/08 08:07, 90F
推
10/08 08:09, , 91F
10/08 08:09, 91F
推
10/08 08:17, , 92F
10/08 08:17, 92F
→
10/08 08:17, , 93F
10/08 08:17, 93F
噓
10/08 08:34, , 94F
10/08 08:34, 94F
→
10/08 08:35, , 95F
10/08 08:35, 95F
→
10/08 08:36, , 96F
10/08 08:36, 96F
→
10/08 08:36, , 97F
10/08 08:36, 97F
推
10/08 08:42, , 98F
10/08 08:42, 98F
噓
10/08 08:56, , 99F
10/08 08:56, 99F
噓
10/08 08:57, , 100F
10/08 08:57, 100F
推
10/08 09:02, , 101F
10/08 09:02, 101F
推
10/08 09:05, , 102F
10/08 09:05, 102F
→
10/08 09:06, , 103F
10/08 09:06, 103F
推
10/08 09:08, , 104F
10/08 09:08, 104F
→
10/08 09:08, , 105F
10/08 09:08, 105F
→
10/08 09:09, , 106F
10/08 09:09, 106F
→
10/08 09:10, , 107F
10/08 09:10, 107F
→
10/08 09:11, , 108F
10/08 09:11, 108F
噓
10/08 09:25, , 109F
10/08 09:25, 109F
噓
10/08 09:35, , 110F
10/08 09:35, 110F
推
10/08 09:43, , 111F
10/08 09:43, 111F
推
10/08 10:17, , 112F
10/08 10:17, 112F
噓
10/08 10:19, , 113F
10/08 10:19, 113F
推
10/08 10:21, , 114F
10/08 10:21, 114F
→
10/08 10:55, , 115F
10/08 10:55, 115F
→
10/08 10:56, , 116F
10/08 10:56, 116F
→
10/08 10:56, , 117F
10/08 10:56, 117F
→
10/08 10:57, , 118F
10/08 10:57, 118F
推
10/08 10:57, , 119F
10/08 10:57, 119F
→
10/08 10:57, , 120F
10/08 10:57, 120F
→
10/08 10:57, , 121F
10/08 10:57, 121F
→
10/08 10:58, , 122F
10/08 10:58, 122F
噓
10/08 11:04, , 123F
10/08 11:04, 123F
噓
10/08 12:03, , 124F
10/08 12:03, 124F
→
10/08 12:04, , 125F
10/08 12:04, 125F
噓
10/08 13:18, , 126F
10/08 13:18, 126F
噓
10/08 14:23, , 127F
10/08 14:23, 127F
噓
10/08 15:21, , 128F
10/08 15:21, 128F
→
10/08 20:58, , 129F
10/08 20:58, 129F
討論串 (同標題文章)