[問卦] 有沒有男生本來就很難帥的八卦?消失
走在路上看看女生
再看看男生
好像真的美女比帥哥多
可是仔細想想帥哥條件嚴苛
女生可愛=正 漂亮=正
氣質=正
男生帥才是帥 可愛不是帥
有點要等於女生的漂亮才是帥
而且女生可以化妝
男生不能化妝
男生帥本來就很難啊
p.s.我中等不帥不醜
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.129.48.149
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1475306296.A.320.html
推
10/01 15:18, , 1F
10/01 15:18, 1F
推
10/01 15:18, , 2F
10/01 15:18, 2F
推
10/01 15:18, , 3F
10/01 15:18, 3F
推
10/01 15:19, , 4F
10/01 15:19, 4F
噓
10/01 15:19, , 5F
10/01 15:19, 5F
推
10/01 15:19, , 6F
10/01 15:19, 6F
推
10/01 15:20, , 7F
10/01 15:20, 7F
→
10/01 15:20, , 8F
10/01 15:20, 8F
推
10/01 15:20, , 9F
10/01 15:20, 9F
→
10/01 15:21, , 10F
10/01 15:21, 10F
推
10/01 15:21, , 11F
10/01 15:21, 11F
→
10/01 15:22, , 12F
10/01 15:22, 12F
真的很多女的過了一定年紀卸妝根本比皮膚好清秀一點的男生還醜
※ 編輯: axija (220.129.48.149), 10/01/2016 15:23:17
推
10/01 15:22, , 13F
10/01 15:22, 13F
→
10/01 15:22, , 14F
10/01 15:22, 14F
推
10/01 15:22, , 15F
10/01 15:22, 15F
推
10/01 15:25, , 16F
10/01 15:25, 16F
推
10/01 15:26, , 17F
10/01 15:26, 17F
推
10/01 15:27, , 18F
10/01 15:27, 18F
→
10/01 15:27, , 19F
10/01 15:27, 19F
推
10/01 15:27, , 20F
10/01 15:27, 20F
推
10/01 15:29, , 21F
10/01 15:29, 21F
推
10/01 15:29, , 22F
10/01 15:29, 22F
→
10/01 15:29, , 23F
10/01 15:29, 23F
推
10/01 15:31, , 24F
10/01 15:31, 24F
→
10/01 15:32, , 25F
10/01 15:32, 25F
推
10/01 15:33, , 26F
10/01 15:33, 26F
→
10/01 15:34, , 27F
10/01 15:34, 27F
推
10/01 15:35, , 28F
10/01 15:35, 28F
→
10/01 15:35, , 29F
10/01 15:35, 29F
推
10/01 15:36, , 30F
10/01 15:36, 30F
推
10/01 15:39, , 31F
10/01 15:39, 31F
推
10/01 15:43, , 32F
10/01 15:43, 32F
→
10/01 15:45, , 33F
10/01 15:45, 33F
推
10/01 15:53, , 34F
10/01 15:53, 34F
推
10/01 15:53, , 35F
10/01 15:53, 35F
推
10/01 15:54, , 36F
10/01 15:54, 36F
噓
10/01 15:56, , 37F
10/01 15:56, 37F
→
10/01 15:56, , 38F
10/01 15:56, 38F
→
10/01 15:57, , 39F
10/01 15:57, 39F
推
10/01 15:57, , 40F
10/01 15:57, 40F
→
10/01 15:58, , 41F
10/01 15:58, 41F
→
10/01 15:58, , 42F
10/01 15:58, 42F
→
10/01 15:58, , 43F
10/01 15:58, 43F
推
10/01 15:59, , 44F
10/01 15:59, 44F
噓
10/01 16:02, , 45F
10/01 16:02, 45F
噓
10/01 16:02, , 46F
10/01 16:02, 46F
噓
10/01 16:05, , 47F
10/01 16:05, 47F
噓
10/01 16:16, , 48F
10/01 16:16, 48F
推
10/01 16:20, , 49F
10/01 16:20, 49F
推
10/01 16:20, , 50F
10/01 16:20, 50F
→
10/01 16:20, , 51F
10/01 16:20, 51F
噓
10/01 16:21, , 52F
10/01 16:21, 52F
→
10/01 16:21, , 53F
10/01 16:21, 53F
推
10/01 16:26, , 54F
10/01 16:26, 54F
噓
10/01 16:34, , 55F
10/01 16:34, 55F
噓
10/01 16:39, , 56F
10/01 16:39, 56F
推
10/01 16:44, , 57F
10/01 16:44, 57F
推
10/01 16:54, , 58F
10/01 16:54, 58F
推
10/01 17:00, , 59F
10/01 17:00, 59F
推
10/01 17:18, , 60F
10/01 17:18, 60F
→
10/01 17:19, , 61F
10/01 17:19, 61F
推
10/01 17:27, , 62F
10/01 17:27, 62F
噓
10/01 17:39, , 63F
10/01 17:39, 63F
→
10/01 17:40, , 64F
10/01 17:40, 64F
推
10/01 17:42, , 65F
10/01 17:42, 65F
推
10/01 17:55, , 66F
10/01 17:55, 66F
推
10/01 18:19, , 67F
10/01 18:19, 67F
→
10/01 19:58, , 68F
10/01 19:58, 68F
推
10/01 20:40, , 69F
10/01 20:40, 69F
→
10/01 20:40, , 70F
10/01 20:40, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):