[新聞] 她帶新房嫁過去 要求36萬元聘金被拒絕消失
1.媒體來源:
蘋果
2.完整新聞標題:
她帶新房嫁過去 要求36萬元聘金被拒絕
3.完整新聞內文:
2016年09月23日13:10
結婚為了聘金、嫁妝的事,又有人身陷其中有困擾了!
女網友在ptt發文求助,她說父母要給一間無貸款的房子作為嫁妝,所以當和對方父母談
婚事時,便表明因為有提供嫁妝,所以也希望男方能拿36萬元當小聘,但對方父母當場拒
絕,理由是「現代人沒有在收聘金的!」因此有點不歡而散。
事後,女網友說她媽媽解釋「小聘也是要給妳和老公貼補家用的!之所以堅持是只奇蒙子
的問題!」所以女網友也將這部份解釋給男友聽「男友反問我,那他父母直接把36萬給他
不好嗎?同樣也是貼補家用!」女網友因而問,男友的說法合理嗎?
其他網友回覆「你父母給你老公,跟他爸媽給你老公的意義就不一樣」、「講嫁妝是比較
好聽吧!婚前財產又沒老公的名字」、「妳先問他們家,現代人除了不收聘也不一定生小
孩,生了小孩也不一定從父姓,問他們接受嗎?傳統現代各有利弊,選擇性傳統只挑有利
的遵守」、「我覺得算了,你先別拿爸媽給你的房子,你們夫妻先去租房子,這樣就沒嫁
妝聘金的問題了」(即時新聞中心/綜合報導)
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/life/20160923/954499/
5.備註:
※ 一個人一天只能張貼一則新聞,被刪或自刪也算額度內,超貼者水桶,請注意
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 202.133.109.178
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1474637857.A.743.html
噓
09/23 21:38, , 1F
09/23 21:38, 1F
噓
09/23 21:38, , 2F
09/23 21:38, 2F
→
09/23 21:38, , 3F
09/23 21:38, 3F
推
09/23 21:38, , 4F
09/23 21:38, 4F
推
09/23 21:38, , 5F
09/23 21:38, 5F
推
09/23 21:39, , 6F
09/23 21:39, 6F
推
09/23 21:39, , 7F
09/23 21:39, 7F
→
09/23 21:39, , 8F
09/23 21:39, 8F
噓
09/23 21:39, , 9F
09/23 21:39, 9F
→
09/23 21:39, , 10F
09/23 21:39, 10F
推
09/23 21:40, , 11F
09/23 21:40, 11F
推
09/23 21:40, , 12F
09/23 21:40, 12F
噓
09/23 21:41, , 13F
09/23 21:41, 13F
噓
09/23 21:41, , 14F
09/23 21:41, 14F
推
09/23 21:41, , 15F
09/23 21:41, 15F
推
09/23 21:41, , 16F
09/23 21:41, 16F
推
09/23 21:41, , 17F
09/23 21:41, 17F
→
09/23 21:41, , 18F
09/23 21:41, 18F
推
09/23 21:41, , 19F
09/23 21:41, 19F
→
09/23 21:41, , 20F
09/23 21:41, 20F
噓
09/23 21:41, , 21F
09/23 21:41, 21F
推
09/23 21:42, , 22F
09/23 21:42, 22F
噓
09/23 21:42, , 23F
09/23 21:42, 23F
→
09/23 21:42, , 24F
09/23 21:42, 24F
→
09/23 21:42, , 25F
09/23 21:42, 25F
→
09/23 21:42, , 26F
09/23 21:42, 26F
→
09/23 21:43, , 27F
09/23 21:43, 27F
→
09/23 21:43, , 28F
09/23 21:43, 28F
推
09/23 21:44, , 29F
09/23 21:44, 29F
→
09/23 21:44, , 30F
09/23 21:44, 30F
→
09/23 21:45, , 31F
09/23 21:45, 31F
→
09/23 21:46, , 32F
09/23 21:46, 32F
噓
09/23 21:46, , 33F
09/23 21:46, 33F
推
09/23 21:46, , 34F
09/23 21:46, 34F
→
09/23 21:46, , 35F
09/23 21:46, 35F
推
09/23 21:47, , 36F
09/23 21:47, 36F
推
09/23 21:47, , 37F
09/23 21:47, 37F
→
09/23 21:47, , 38F
09/23 21:47, 38F
→
09/23 21:47, , 39F
09/23 21:47, 39F
還有 105 則推文
噓
09/23 23:17, , 145F
09/23 23:17, 145F
→
09/23 23:18, , 146F
09/23 23:18, 146F
→
09/23 23:18, , 147F
09/23 23:18, 147F
推
09/23 23:20, , 148F
09/23 23:20, 148F
→
09/23 23:21, , 149F
09/23 23:21, 149F
→
09/23 23:21, , 150F
09/23 23:21, 150F
→
09/23 23:21, , 151F
09/23 23:21, 151F
→
09/23 23:22, , 152F
09/23 23:22, 152F
推
09/23 23:34, , 153F
09/23 23:34, 153F
→
09/23 23:34, , 154F
09/23 23:34, 154F
→
09/23 23:34, , 155F
09/23 23:34, 155F
推
09/23 23:50, , 156F
09/23 23:50, 156F
噓
09/24 00:07, , 157F
09/24 00:07, 157F
噓
09/24 00:10, , 158F
09/24 00:10, 158F
推
09/24 00:22, , 159F
09/24 00:22, 159F
噓
09/24 00:23, , 160F
09/24 00:23, 160F
推
09/24 00:25, , 161F
09/24 00:25, 161F
→
09/24 00:27, , 162F
09/24 00:27, 162F
推
09/24 00:46, , 163F
09/24 00:46, 163F
→
09/24 00:50, , 164F
09/24 00:50, 164F
→
09/24 00:50, , 165F
09/24 00:50, 165F
噓
09/24 00:51, , 166F
09/24 00:51, 166F
→
09/24 01:02, , 167F
09/24 01:02, 167F
噓
09/24 01:27, , 168F
09/24 01:27, 168F
→
09/24 01:27, , 169F
09/24 01:27, 169F
→
09/24 01:27, , 170F
09/24 01:27, 170F
→
09/24 01:28, , 171F
09/24 01:28, 171F
→
09/24 01:28, , 172F
09/24 01:28, 172F
→
09/24 01:58, , 173F
09/24 01:58, 173F
→
09/24 01:58, , 174F
09/24 01:58, 174F
→
09/24 01:58, , 175F
09/24 01:58, 175F
推
09/24 06:19, , 176F
09/24 06:19, 176F
→
09/24 06:19, , 177F
09/24 06:19, 177F
噓
09/24 10:33, , 178F
09/24 10:33, 178F
推
09/24 10:57, , 179F
09/24 10:57, 179F
→
09/24 10:58, , 180F
09/24 10:58, 180F
推
09/24 11:48, , 181F
09/24 11:48, 181F
→
09/24 13:02, , 182F
09/24 13:02, 182F
推
09/24 13:49, , 183F
09/24 13:49, 183F
推
09/26 16:18, , 184F
09/26 16:18, 184F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 14 篇):