[新聞] 超商食品都拿後排的?店員真心話改變網友消失
1.媒體來源:
Nownews
2.完整新聞標題:
超商食品都拿後排的?店員真心話改變網友
3.完整新聞內文:
不少人去超商買東西時,都習慣拿後排的食物和飲料。不過,一名小七店員日前在《
Dcard》發文,表示這個舉動會造成許多報廢品,讓她感到十分心痛,因此她呼籲民眾能
拿前排的商品,而這篇文章也引起熱烈回響。
這名小七店員提到,許多客人到便利商店時,都習慣拿後排的商品,因為保存期限較為新
鮮,讓每天要處理報廢商品的她,感到相當難過,「看到一堆食物被浪費,我就很痛心(
想想非洲的小孩啊啊啊)。即便我們店生意滿好的,但總是還是會出現一堆報廢品。」
若是當天就要食用,她建議大家能拿前排的產品,「我相信期限多那幾天不會比較好吃,
少那幾天也不會讓你營養不良。小七店員也是都吃報廢品,我們一樣頭好壯壯,更何況身
為我們尊貴顧客的你們,絕對不會吃到過期品的。」
女店員也提到,超商對於商品檢查非常嚴格,店內乳品在過期前一天就會取出,而鮮食只
要一過期,條碼也會刷不過。不過,也有不少網友質疑為何不將過期品給有需要的人,對
此她則回應「我們不確定哪些人才是真正需要的人(就像有些有著高收入的低收入戶一樣
),一旦變成這樣,有人想免費吃他想吃的,他可以等到時間到就拿,何必花錢?」
這篇文章引發討論,網友紛紛留言「謝謝原po愛心,下次會拿保存期限即期的」、「我以
後會拿前面的!以前沒有想到這麼多,感覺浪費的好多食物覺得不好意思」、「同為7-11
店員推,每天撿報廢真的都覺得超浪費」。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.nownews.com/n/2016/09/02/2226088
5.備註:
葉佩雯吧? 你以為拿前排的 後排的就不會報廢? 或是7就會拿後排的送給非洲小孩喔?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.226.160.248
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1472868957.A.AEA.html
→
09/03 10:16, , 1F
09/03 10:16, 1F
→
09/03 10:16, , 2F
09/03 10:16, 2F
→
09/03 10:16, , 3F
09/03 10:16, 3F
推
09/03 10:16, , 4F
09/03 10:16, 4F
噓
09/03 10:17, , 5F
09/03 10:17, 5F
→
09/03 10:17, , 6F
09/03 10:17, 6F
→
09/03 10:17, , 7F
09/03 10:17, 7F
不難懂啊,,,謝謝您幫羅董減少損失
消費者花一樣的費用...買到一樣的東西啊...真正浪費食物的是超商吧? @@
噓
09/03 10:17, , 8F
09/03 10:17, 8F
噓
09/03 10:17, , 9F
09/03 10:17, 9F
噓
09/03 10:17, , 10F
09/03 10:17, 10F
推
09/03 10:18, , 11F
09/03 10:18, 11F
→
09/03 10:18, , 12F
09/03 10:18, 12F
噓
09/03 10:18, , 13F
09/03 10:18, 13F
→
09/03 10:19, , 14F
09/03 10:19, 14F
推
09/03 10:19, , 15F
09/03 10:19, 15F
推
09/03 10:19, , 16F
09/03 10:19, 16F
噓
09/03 10:19, , 17F
09/03 10:19, 17F
噓
09/03 10:19, , 18F
09/03 10:19, 18F
噓
09/03 10:19, , 19F
09/03 10:19, 19F
→
09/03 10:20, , 20F
09/03 10:20, 20F
噓
09/03 10:20, , 21F
09/03 10:20, 21F
→
09/03 10:20, , 22F
09/03 10:20, 22F
推
09/03 10:20, , 23F
09/03 10:20, 23F
噓
09/03 10:20, , 24F
09/03 10:20, 24F
噓
09/03 10:20, , 25F
09/03 10:20, 25F
噓
09/03 10:20, , 26F
09/03 10:20, 26F
噓
09/03 10:21, , 27F
09/03 10:21, 27F
噓
09/03 10:21, , 28F
09/03 10:21, 28F
→
09/03 10:21, , 29F
09/03 10:21, 29F
→
09/03 10:21, , 30F
09/03 10:21, 30F
推
09/03 10:21, , 31F
09/03 10:21, 31F
噓
09/03 10:22, , 32F
09/03 10:22, 32F
→
09/03 10:22, , 33F
09/03 10:22, 33F
→
09/03 10:22, , 34F
09/03 10:22, 34F
→
09/03 10:22, , 35F
09/03 10:22, 35F
噓
09/03 10:23, , 36F
09/03 10:23, 36F
→
09/03 10:23, , 37F
09/03 10:23, 37F
噓
09/03 10:24, , 38F
09/03 10:24, 38F
還有 30 則推文
還有 1 段內文
噓
09/03 11:00, , 69F
09/03 11:00, 69F
→
09/03 11:00, , 70F
09/03 11:00, 70F
推
09/03 11:02, , 71F
09/03 11:02, 71F
噓
09/03 11:05, , 72F
09/03 11:05, 72F
噓
09/03 11:09, , 73F
09/03 11:09, 73F
噓
09/03 11:09, , 74F
09/03 11:09, 74F
噓
09/03 11:10, , 75F
09/03 11:10, 75F
噓
09/03 11:11, , 76F
09/03 11:11, 76F
噓
09/03 11:11, , 77F
09/03 11:11, 77F
推
09/03 11:11, , 78F
09/03 11:11, 78F
噓
09/03 11:12, , 79F
09/03 11:12, 79F
噓
09/03 11:15, , 80F
09/03 11:15, 80F
噓
09/03 11:15, , 81F
09/03 11:15, 81F
→
09/03 11:25, , 82F
09/03 11:25, 82F
推
09/03 11:27, , 83F
09/03 11:27, 83F
噓
09/03 11:28, , 84F
09/03 11:28, 84F
噓
09/03 11:29, , 85F
09/03 11:29, 85F
噓
09/03 11:30, , 86F
09/03 11:30, 86F
→
09/03 11:30, , 87F
09/03 11:30, 87F
噓
09/03 11:31, , 88F
09/03 11:31, 88F
噓
09/03 11:32, , 89F
09/03 11:32, 89F
噓
09/03 11:34, , 90F
09/03 11:34, 90F
→
09/03 11:34, , 91F
09/03 11:34, 91F
→
09/03 11:35, , 92F
09/03 11:35, 92F
噓
09/03 11:35, , 93F
09/03 11:35, 93F
噓
09/03 11:38, , 94F
09/03 11:38, 94F
噓
09/03 11:42, , 95F
09/03 11:42, 95F
推
09/03 11:46, , 96F
09/03 11:46, 96F
→
09/03 12:00, , 97F
09/03 12:00, 97F
推
09/03 12:04, , 98F
09/03 12:04, 98F
噓
09/03 12:12, , 99F
09/03 12:12, 99F
噓
09/03 12:15, , 100F
09/03 12:15, 100F
噓
09/03 12:20, , 101F
09/03 12:20, 101F
噓
09/03 12:35, , 102F
09/03 12:35, 102F
噓
09/03 12:36, , 103F
09/03 12:36, 103F
噓
09/03 12:41, , 104F
09/03 12:41, 104F
噓
09/03 12:58, , 105F
09/03 12:58, 105F
噓
09/03 13:58, , 106F
09/03 13:58, 106F
噓
09/03 14:40, , 107F
09/03 14:40, 107F
噓
09/05 16:52, , 108F
09/05 16:52, 108F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):