[問卦] 張雨生沒死輪得到周杰倫那麼紅嗎?消失
張雨生 詞曲唱都很強
堪稱台灣的中島美雪
一堆創作型華語歌手承認張雨生深深地影響他們
周杰倫早期曲風也是有跟張雨生致敬的味道
卡啦ok live 台北 我 更是領先時代至少十年
可惜先知是孤獨的
這張唱片在當年動輒數十萬張的年代
只賣了2萬張
但這無損張雨生的成就
不服的聽完這張再來辯
反觀周杰倫剛好遇到方文山
加上張雨生又意外過世
不然 華語創作天王輪得到他嗎?
有沒有 周杰倫只是華語作曲創作第二人的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.228.114.79
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1472738570.A.481.html
→
09/01 22:03, , 1F
09/01 22:03, 1F
推
09/01 22:03, , 2F
09/01 22:03, 2F
→
09/01 22:03, , 3F
09/01 22:03, 3F
噓
09/01 22:03, , 4F
09/01 22:03, 4F
→
09/01 22:04, , 5F
09/01 22:04, 5F
推
09/01 22:04, , 6F
09/01 22:04, 6F
推
09/01 22:04, , 7F
09/01 22:04, 7F
→
09/01 22:05, , 8F
09/01 22:05, 8F
推
09/01 22:05, , 9F
09/01 22:05, 9F
噓
09/01 22:05, , 10F
09/01 22:05, 10F
推
09/01 22:05, , 11F
09/01 22:05, 11F
→
09/01 22:05, , 12F
09/01 22:05, 12F
推
09/01 22:05, , 13F
09/01 22:05, 13F
→
09/01 22:06, , 14F
09/01 22:06, 14F
→
09/01 22:06, , 15F
09/01 22:06, 15F
推
09/01 22:06, , 16F
09/01 22:06, 16F
推
09/01 22:07, , 17F
09/01 22:07, 17F
噓
09/01 22:08, , 18F
09/01 22:08, 18F
推
09/01 22:10, , 19F
09/01 22:10, 19F
推
09/01 22:10, , 20F
09/01 22:10, 20F
→
09/01 22:11, , 21F
09/01 22:11, 21F
→
09/01 22:11, , 22F
09/01 22:11, 22F
噓
09/01 22:11, , 23F
09/01 22:11, 23F
推
09/01 22:11, , 24F
09/01 22:11, 24F
→
09/01 22:12, , 25F
09/01 22:12, 25F
張雨生沒有類型吧 目前華語樂壇大多數類型的歌
他的專輯都找得到 算是試得很廣的
反觀周 呵呵
→
09/01 22:13, , 26F
09/01 22:13, 26F
→
09/01 22:13, , 27F
09/01 22:13, 27F
推
09/01 22:13, , 28F
09/01 22:13, 28F
※ 編輯: cliom66779 (36.228.114.79), 09/01/2016 22:16:23
推
09/01 22:15, , 29F
09/01 22:15, 29F
推
09/01 22:15, , 30F
09/01 22:15, 30F
→
09/01 22:15, , 31F
09/01 22:15, 31F
→
09/01 22:16, , 32F
09/01 22:16, 32F
推
09/01 22:16, , 33F
09/01 22:16, 33F
→
09/01 22:16, , 34F
09/01 22:16, 34F
→
09/01 22:16, , 35F
09/01 22:16, 35F
→
09/01 22:17, , 36F
09/01 22:17, 36F
推
09/01 22:18, , 37F
09/01 22:18, 37F
還有 66 則推文
推
09/02 00:03, , 104F
09/02 00:03, 104F
噓
09/02 00:03, , 105F
09/02 00:03, 105F
→
09/02 00:11, , 106F
09/02 00:11, 106F
→
09/02 00:11, , 107F
09/02 00:11, 107F
→
09/02 00:11, , 108F
09/02 00:11, 108F
推
09/02 00:18, , 109F
09/02 00:18, 109F
推
09/02 03:20, , 110F
09/02 03:20, 110F
推
09/02 09:17, , 111F
09/02 09:17, 111F
推
09/02 11:13, , 112F
09/02 11:13, 112F
→
09/02 11:14, , 113F
09/02 11:14, 113F
→
09/02 11:14, , 114F
09/02 11:14, 114F
→
09/02 11:15, , 115F
09/02 11:15, 115F
推
09/02 18:58, , 116F
09/02 18:58, 116F
→
09/02 18:59, , 117F
09/02 18:59, 117F
推
09/02 19:40, , 118F
09/02 19:40, 118F
推
09/04 11:00, , 119F
09/04 11:00, 119F
推
09/04 11:03, , 120F
09/04 11:03, 120F
→
09/04 12:25, , 121F
09/04 12:25, 121F
推
09/04 12:48, , 122F
09/04 12:48, 122F
→
09/04 12:48, , 123F
09/04 12:48, 123F
→
09/04 12:50, , 124F
09/04 12:50, 124F
推
09/04 12:58, , 125F
09/04 12:58, 125F
推
09/04 13:00, , 126F
09/04 13:00, 126F
→
09/04 13:01, , 127F
09/04 13:01, 127F
→
09/04 13:02, , 128F
09/04 13:02, 128F
→
09/04 13:03, , 129F
09/04 13:03, 129F
→
09/04 13:03, , 130F
09/04 13:03, 130F
→
09/04 13:28, , 131F
09/04 13:28, 131F
噓
09/04 15:56, , 132F
09/04 15:56, 132F
噓
09/04 21:14, , 133F
09/04 21:14, 133F
噓
09/04 21:20, , 134F
09/04 21:20, 134F
推
09/04 21:29, , 135F
09/04 21:29, 135F
推
09/04 22:50, , 136F
09/04 22:50, 136F
推
09/04 23:48, , 137F
09/04 23:48, 137F
噓
09/05 00:19, , 138F
09/05 00:19, 138F
→
09/05 00:21, , 139F
09/05 00:21, 139F
→
09/05 00:22, , 140F
09/05 00:22, 140F
推
09/05 06:15, , 141F
09/05 06:15, 141F
推
09/05 09:47, , 142F
09/05 09:47, 142F
→
09/05 09:48, , 143F
09/05 09:48, 143F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 13 篇):