Re: [新聞] 網友為莊佳容抱屈 謝淑薇這樣回應被砲轟...消失
※ 引述《yoyo900906 (Foryoker)》之銘言:
: 原本我是挺謝的 不過謝好像越來越過火了
: 要衝撞體制可以 退賽可以 但竟然怪莊不找人?
: 真的很奇怪 干莊屁事
: 謝本來是沒什麼錯 但因為這句發言
: 我想 以後沒人會找她打雙打了
真正體制問題,只有選手最清楚
外界猜測只會越說越偏
製造多餘紛擾跟錯誤解讀
版上很多人都只跟媒體風向起舞
現在說謝錯,一堆追風者
事後有新事實,再來發道歉文?
風向一直變,不會很踏實吧?
沒錯這就是正港的台灣鄉民 bey
我想要等林全開始改革體協
再來判斷誰錯誰委屈,比較好
說個笑話: 有人說選手是國家栽培
成長的,當然要為國家效力
(請樓下連結影片)
募款 企業捐款 民間幫助原來都是
政府的力量??
旅外打拼的球員也一定要效力?因為
國家栽培,原來國家有投資mlb?
所以不用問人家意見?
直接扣上不愛國的帽子~偉哉啊
先把選手保障跟制度弄好,再來
談愛國~先變成台灣體協再來談~
先不變成酬庸再來談~不變成養老
協會再來談
不然黨工只會說抱小孩
人家上mlb有靠國家嗎?
國家巴不得靠他說台灣之光~
靠他讓台灣 國旗 揚名mlb
體育賽 中華台北隊?
等真正變成"台灣隊"真的國家
再來談國家為選手做了什麼
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Samsung SM-N900.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.224.3.101
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1470901265.A.DDF.html
推
08/11 15:41, , 1F
08/11 15:41, 1F
→
08/11 15:42, , 2F
08/11 15:42, 2F
→
08/11 15:42, , 3F
08/11 15:42, 3F
→
08/11 15:42, , 4F
08/11 15:42, 4F
→
08/11 15:42, , 5F
08/11 15:42, 5F
推
08/11 15:43, , 6F
08/11 15:43, 6F
→
08/11 15:43, , 7F
08/11 15:43, 7F
→
08/11 15:44, , 8F
08/11 15:44, 8F
→
08/11 15:44, , 9F
08/11 15:44, 9F
→
08/11 15:44, , 10F
08/11 15:44, 10F
→
08/11 15:44, , 11F
08/11 15:44, 11F
→
08/11 15:45, , 12F
08/11 15:45, 12F
→
08/11 15:45, , 13F
08/11 15:45, 13F
推
08/11 15:45, , 14F
08/11 15:45, 14F
→
08/11 15:45, , 15F
08/11 15:45, 15F
推
08/11 15:46, , 16F
08/11 15:46, 16F
→
08/11 15:46, , 17F
08/11 15:46, 17F
→
08/11 15:46, , 18F
08/11 15:46, 18F
→
08/11 15:46, , 19F
08/11 15:46, 19F
→
08/11 15:46, , 20F
08/11 15:46, 20F
→
08/11 15:46, , 21F
08/11 15:46, 21F
→
08/11 15:46, , 22F
08/11 15:46, 22F
→
08/11 15:47, , 23F
08/11 15:47, 23F
→
08/11 15:47, , 24F
08/11 15:47, 24F
→
08/11 15:47, , 25F
08/11 15:47, 25F
噓
08/11 15:47, , 26F
08/11 15:47, 26F
推
08/11 15:47, , 27F
08/11 15:47, 27F
→
08/11 15:48, , 28F
08/11 15:48, 28F
→
08/11 15:48, , 29F
08/11 15:48, 29F
→
08/11 15:49, , 30F
08/11 15:49, 30F
→
08/11 15:49, , 31F
08/11 15:49, 31F
→
08/11 15:49, , 32F
08/11 15:49, 32F
→
08/11 15:49, , 33F
08/11 15:49, 33F
→
08/11 15:49, , 34F
08/11 15:49, 34F
→
08/11 15:49, , 35F
08/11 15:49, 35F
→
08/11 15:50, , 36F
08/11 15:50, 36F
噓
08/11 15:50, , 37F
08/11 15:50, 37F
→
08/11 15:50, , 38F
08/11 15:50, 38F
推
08/11 15:51, , 39F
08/11 15:51, 39F
還有 37 則推文
→
08/11 16:06, , 77F
08/11 16:06, 77F
→
08/11 16:06, , 78F
08/11 16:06, 78F
→
08/11 16:06, , 79F
08/11 16:06, 79F
→
08/11 16:06, , 80F
08/11 16:06, 80F
→
08/11 16:06, , 81F
08/11 16:06, 81F
→
08/11 16:07, , 82F
08/11 16:07, 82F
→
08/11 16:07, , 83F
08/11 16:07, 83F
→
08/11 16:07, , 84F
08/11 16:07, 84F
→
08/11 16:07, , 85F
08/11 16:07, 85F
推
08/11 16:07, , 86F
08/11 16:07, 86F
→
08/11 16:07, , 87F
08/11 16:07, 87F
→
08/11 16:08, , 88F
08/11 16:08, 88F
→
08/11 16:09, , 89F
08/11 16:09, 89F
→
08/11 16:09, , 90F
08/11 16:09, 90F
→
08/11 16:09, , 91F
08/11 16:09, 91F
→
08/11 16:09, , 92F
08/11 16:09, 92F
→
08/11 16:09, , 93F
08/11 16:09, 93F
→
08/11 16:09, , 94F
08/11 16:09, 94F
→
08/11 16:09, , 95F
08/11 16:09, 95F
推
08/11 16:09, , 96F
08/11 16:09, 96F
→
08/11 16:10, , 97F
08/11 16:10, 97F
→
08/11 16:10, , 98F
08/11 16:10, 98F
→
08/11 16:10, , 99F
08/11 16:10, 99F
→
08/11 16:11, , 100F
08/11 16:11, 100F
→
08/11 16:11, , 101F
08/11 16:11, 101F
→
08/11 16:12, , 102F
08/11 16:12, 102F
推
08/11 16:12, , 103F
08/11 16:12, 103F
→
08/11 16:13, , 104F
08/11 16:13, 104F
→
08/11 16:13, , 105F
08/11 16:13, 105F
→
08/11 16:13, , 106F
08/11 16:13, 106F
→
08/11 16:13, , 107F
08/11 16:13, 107F
→
08/11 16:14, , 108F
08/11 16:14, 108F
→
08/11 16:14, , 109F
08/11 16:14, 109F
推
08/11 16:15, , 110F
08/11 16:15, 110F
→
08/11 16:16, , 111F
08/11 16:16, 111F
→
08/11 16:16, , 112F
08/11 16:16, 112F
推
08/11 16:16, , 113F
08/11 16:16, 113F
→
08/11 16:17, , 114F
08/11 16:17, 114F
→
08/11 16:17, , 115F
08/11 16:17, 115F
推
08/11 16:25, , 116F
08/11 16:25, 116F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 19 之 24 篇):