[問卦] 烏克蘭的覺醒青年為何不敢打俄羅斯軍隊消失
烏克蘭的覺醒青年們,2013年11月起在首都基輔的示威活動
用公民力量嚴正抗議烏克蘭總統亞努科維奇親俄斷歐盟的行動
一場全城動盪的結果,榮耀歸於烏克蘭!總統 亞努科維奇下台了
烏克蘭覺醒青年的紀錄片Winter on Fire: Ukraine's Fight for Freedom
更獲得2016年奧斯卡最佳紀錄獎的提名
但當2014年俄羅斯部隊奉普丁命令進攻克里米亞如入無人之境
烏克蘭機場與軍事基地失守,烏克蘭的覺醒青年卻毫無對策?
基輔的那些覺醒青年們,要上戰場抗俄時,人都不見了?
反對俄羅斯,結果當俄羅斯進佔國土時
在自己國家打警察、建立堡壘抗拒軍警、進攻官署的勇氣,通通不見了
這讓我想到亞洲某小島的覺醒青年,反對中國但似乎也不敢對抗中國
有沒有烏克蘭的覺醒青年,反俄羅斯卻不敢跟俄羅斯對抗的八卦?
--
台灣吱青啼不盡,英文已過髮夾彎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.45.60.184
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1466092587.A.273.html
→
06/16 23:56, , 1F
06/16 23:56, 1F
推
06/16 23:56, , 2F
06/16 23:56, 2F
推
06/16 23:57, , 3F
06/16 23:57, 3F
噓
06/16 23:57, , 4F
06/16 23:57, 4F
→
06/16 23:57, , 5F
06/16 23:57, 5F
噓
06/16 23:57, , 6F
06/16 23:57, 6F
推
06/16 23:57, , 7F
06/16 23:57, 7F
→
06/16 23:58, , 8F
06/16 23:58, 8F
噓
06/16 23:58, , 9F
06/16 23:58, 9F
→
06/16 23:58, , 10F
06/16 23:58, 10F
→
06/16 23:59, , 11F
06/16 23:59, 11F
→
06/16 23:59, , 12F
06/16 23:59, 12F
推
06/16 23:59, , 13F
06/16 23:59, 13F
噓
06/16 23:59, , 14F
06/16 23:59, 14F
→
06/16 23:59, , 15F
06/16 23:59, 15F
推
06/17 00:00, , 16F
06/17 00:00, 16F
噓
06/17 00:01, , 17F
06/17 00:01, 17F
推
06/17 00:05, , 18F
06/17 00:05, 18F
→
06/17 00:05, , 19F
06/17 00:05, 19F
噓
06/17 00:08, , 20F
06/17 00:08, 20F
還有 16 則推文
還有 16 段內文
→
06/17 00:24, , 37F
06/17 00:24, 37F
→
06/17 00:24, , 38F
06/17 00:24, 38F
噓
06/17 00:25, , 39F
06/17 00:25, 39F
→
06/17 00:25, , 40F
06/17 00:25, 40F
→
06/17 00:26, , 41F
06/17 00:26, 41F
→
06/17 00:34, , 42F
06/17 00:34, 42F
→
06/17 00:34, , 43F
06/17 00:34, 43F
噓
06/17 01:01, , 44F
06/17 01:01, 44F
噓
06/17 01:29, , 45F
06/17 01:29, 45F
噓
06/17 01:37, , 46F
06/17 01:37, 46F
→
06/17 01:46, , 47F
06/17 01:46, 47F
→
06/17 01:47, , 48F
06/17 01:47, 48F
→
06/17 01:47, , 49F
06/17 01:47, 49F
→
06/17 01:48, , 50F
06/17 01:48, 50F
→
06/17 01:49, , 51F
06/17 01:49, 51F
→
06/17 01:49, , 52F
06/17 01:49, 52F
→
06/17 01:51, , 53F
06/17 01:51, 53F
→
06/17 01:52, , 54F
06/17 01:52, 54F
噓
06/17 03:15, , 55F
06/17 03:15, 55F
→
06/17 06:43, , 56F
06/17 06:43, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):