Re: [新聞] 勞團批:民進黨偷工資7天假 是強盜小偷消失
之前我就已經整理過兩黨版本最大的差異,可惜都沒人要推文,
現在我只好把同樣的內容再Po出來強調一次:
520以前的KMT版本跟目前DPP版本其實大同小異,都是單週40hr,然後砍七天假,
唯一不同的是,KMT沒有強制週休二日,DPP一樣沒有,二者差異在於-
KMT給的是一週一例假,DPP是一週一例假一休息日。
乍看之下DPP好像比較好?大錯特錯,休息日就是完完全全的一個文字遊戲,
在民進黨的修法之下,休息日被迫上班領的薪水,會比本來平日延長工時的加班費還低,
當初我文章講得不夠清楚,不過自由時報這邊有列表,我想有腦的看一下都懂:
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1723574
本來國民黨的版本雖未強制週休,但如果週六去上班,
那就依法給超時的加班費(1.33~1.67倍不等),
但是民進黨改成休息日後,就變成只能拿到另外加給的部分(1倍),
因為休息日工作已經算在月薪內了。
你們可以去看上一篇的影片連結,王育敏委員就是質詢這部分,
結果不管是部長還是司長都不敢正面回答,因為休息日就是加班費可以比較少。
看懂了嗎?民進黨的休息日不僅勞工沒得休,加班費算法還比平日要差,
已經被迫假日上班了,錢還沒多給,這根本不是休息日,這叫奴隸日。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.116.88
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1465923574.A.F3F.html
→
06/15 01:00, , 1F
06/15 01:00, 1F
推
06/15 01:00, , 2F
06/15 01:00, 2F
→
06/15 01:00, , 3F
06/15 01:00, 3F
→
06/15 01:00, , 4F
06/15 01:00, 4F
→
06/15 01:01, , 5F
06/15 01:01, 5F
推
06/15 01:02, , 6F
06/15 01:02, 6F
推
06/15 01:02, , 7F
06/15 01:02, 7F
推
06/15 01:02, , 8F
06/15 01:02, 8F
→
06/15 01:02, , 9F
06/15 01:02, 9F
因為老板會僧7
推
06/15 01:02, , 10F
06/15 01:02, 10F
推
06/15 01:02, , 11F
06/15 01:02, 11F
→
06/15 01:02, , 12F
06/15 01:02, 12F
→
06/15 01:03, , 13F
06/15 01:03, 13F
推
06/15 01:03, , 14F
06/15 01:03, 14F
推
06/15 01:03, , 15F
06/15 01:03, 15F
→
06/15 01:03, , 16F
06/15 01:03, 16F
→
06/15 01:04, , 17F
06/15 01:04, 17F
麻煩就事論事喔,如果就修法內容客觀來看,KMT版本還比較好。
推
06/15 01:04, , 18F
06/15 01:04, 18F
推
06/15 01:04, , 19F
06/15 01:04, 19F
你以為老闆吃素的?別忘了這次草案還有彈性工時修法呢,超有彈性der。
推
06/15 01:05, , 20F
06/15 01:05, 20F
※ 編輯: DongRaeGu (36.231.116.88), 06/15/2016 01:06:32
推
06/15 01:05, , 21F
06/15 01:05, 21F
推
06/15 01:06, , 22F
06/15 01:06, 22F
→
06/15 01:06, , 23F
06/15 01:06, 23F
推
06/15 01:06, , 24F
06/15 01:06, 24F
推
06/15 01:07, , 25F
06/15 01:07, 25F
推
06/15 01:07, , 26F
06/15 01:07, 26F
推
06/15 01:07, , 27F
06/15 01:07, 27F
推
06/15 01:07, , 28F
06/15 01:07, 28F
→
06/15 01:08, , 29F
06/15 01:08, 29F
→
06/15 01:08, , 30F
06/15 01:08, 30F
→
06/15 01:08, , 31F
06/15 01:08, 31F
→
06/15 01:08, , 32F
06/15 01:08, 32F
→
06/15 01:08, , 33F
06/15 01:08, 33F
國民黨在勞工議題上確實沒有話事的立場,這是事實。
推
06/15 01:09, , 34F
06/15 01:09, 34F
還有 151 則推文
還有 4 段內文
推
06/15 13:07, , 186F
06/15 13:07, 186F
推
06/15 13:19, , 187F
06/15 13:19, 187F
推
06/15 13:50, , 188F
06/15 13:50, 188F
→
06/15 13:59, , 189F
06/15 13:59, 189F
推
06/15 14:02, , 190F
06/15 14:02, 190F
推
06/15 14:11, , 191F
06/15 14:11, 191F
推
06/15 14:35, , 192F
06/15 14:35, 192F
→
06/15 15:07, , 193F
06/15 15:07, 193F
推
06/15 15:08, , 194F
06/15 15:08, 194F
噓
06/15 15:19, , 195F
06/15 15:19, 195F
→
06/15 15:19, , 196F
06/15 15:19, 196F
→
06/15 16:30, , 197F
06/15 16:30, 197F
推
06/15 16:35, , 198F
06/15 16:35, 198F
→
06/15 17:14, , 199F
06/15 17:14, 199F
推
06/15 19:16, , 200F
06/15 19:16, 200F
→
06/15 20:00, , 201F
06/15 20:00, 201F
推
06/15 20:15, , 202F
06/15 20:15, 202F
噓
06/15 20:15, , 203F
06/15 20:15, 203F
推
06/15 20:51, , 204F
06/15 20:51, 204F
推
06/15 21:42, , 205F
06/15 21:42, 205F
推
06/15 22:01, , 206F
06/15 22:01, 206F
推
06/15 23:05, , 207F
06/15 23:05, 207F
推
06/15 23:24, , 208F
06/15 23:24, 208F
推
06/16 00:29, , 209F
06/16 00:29, 209F
噓
06/16 02:47, , 210F
06/16 02:47, 210F
→
06/16 02:47, , 211F
06/16 02:47, 211F
→
06/16 02:47, , 212F
06/16 02:47, 212F
推
06/16 03:29, , 213F
06/16 03:29, 213F
噓
06/16 20:55, , 214F
06/16 20:55, 214F
推
06/17 00:58, , 215F
06/17 00:58, 215F
噓
06/17 09:53, , 216F
06/17 09:53, 216F
→
06/17 09:53, , 217F
06/17 09:53, 217F
→
06/17 09:53, , 218F
06/17 09:53, 218F
→
06/17 09:53, , 219F
06/17 09:53, 219F
→
06/17 09:53, , 220F
06/17 09:53, 220F
→
06/17 09:53, , 221F
06/17 09:53, 221F
→
06/17 09:53, , 222F
06/17 09:53, 222F
→
06/17 09:54, , 223F
06/17 09:54, 223F
推
06/17 19:20, , 224F
06/17 19:20, 224F
推
06/17 19:27, , 225F
06/17 19:27, 225F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 10 之 33 篇):