[問卦] 小紅帽其實是一則性暗示的故事?消失
大家午安大家好
肥宅我剛剛看到一篇文章說小紅帽其實是一則有關性暗示的故事
原本故事內容是小紅帽告訴灰狼地址
然後故意穿紅色衣服暗示誘惑灰狼
然後原本是沒有獵人這一段的
結尾就是小紅帽被吃掉
說是十六十七世紀歐洲宮廷很淫亂
所以作者寫這個故事是要提醒宮廷的人
男人表面花言巧語其實會害了女人的一生
真的是這樣嗎?
還是我被作者唬爛了?
※ 八卦板務請到 GossipPicket 檢舉板詢問
※ a.張貼問卦請注意,充實文章內容、是否有專板,本板並非萬能問板。
※ b.一天只能張貼 "兩則" 問卦,自刪及被刪也算兩篇之內,
※ 超貼者將被水桶,請注意!
※ c.本看板嚴格禁止政治問卦,發文問卦前請先仔細閱讀相關板規。
※ d.一行文、未滿20字視同鬧板,請注意!
※ (↑看完提醒請刪除ctrl + y)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.216.66.18
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1461126830.A.FDC.html
推
04/20 12:34, , 1F
04/20 12:34, 1F
推
04/20 12:34, , 2F
04/20 12:34, 2F
推
04/20 12:34, , 3F
04/20 12:34, 3F
噓
04/20 12:34, , 4F
04/20 12:34, 4F
推
04/20 12:34, , 5F
04/20 12:34, 5F
→
04/20 12:34, , 6F
04/20 12:34, 6F
推
04/20 12:35, , 7F
04/20 12:35, 7F
推
04/20 12:35, , 8F
04/20 12:35, 8F
推
04/20 12:35, , 9F
04/20 12:35, 9F
推
04/20 12:35, , 10F
04/20 12:35, 10F

推
04/20 12:36, , 11F
04/20 12:36, 11F
噓
04/20 12:36, , 12F
04/20 12:36, 12F
推
04/20 12:37, , 13F
04/20 12:37, 13F
推
04/20 12:38, , 14F
04/20 12:38, 14F
推
04/20 12:38, , 15F
04/20 12:38, 15F
→
04/20 12:38, , 16F
04/20 12:38, 16F
推
04/20 12:40, , 17F
04/20 12:40, 17F
噓
04/20 12:40, , 18F
04/20 12:40, 18F
推
04/20 12:46, , 19F
04/20 12:46, 19F
→
04/20 12:49, , 20F
04/20 12:49, 20F
→
04/20 12:50, , 21F
04/20 12:50, 21F
推
04/20 12:50, , 22F
04/20 12:50, 22F
→
04/20 12:50, , 23F
04/20 12:50, 23F
→
04/20 13:01, , 24F
04/20 13:01, 24F
推
04/20 13:05, , 25F
04/20 13:05, 25F
推
04/20 13:07, , 26F
04/20 13:07, 26F
推
04/20 13:15, , 27F
04/20 13:15, 27F
推
04/20 13:17, , 28F
04/20 13:17, 28F
推
04/20 13:35, , 29F
04/20 13:35, 29F
→
04/20 13:36, , 30F
04/20 13:36, 30F
推
04/20 13:42, , 31F
04/20 13:42, 31F

→
04/20 13:42, , 32F
04/20 13:42, 32F

推
04/20 13:42, , 33F
04/20 13:42, 33F
推
04/20 13:45, , 34F
04/20 13:45, 34F
推
04/20 13:56, , 35F
04/20 13:56, 35F
噓
04/20 14:22, , 36F
04/20 14:22, 36F
推
04/20 14:27, , 37F
04/20 14:27, 37F
推
04/20 14:33, , 38F
04/20 14:33, 38F
推
04/20 15:11, , 39F
04/20 15:11, 39F
推
04/20 18:23, , 40F
04/20 18:23, 40F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):