Re: [新聞] 20世紀9大殺人魔王 蔣介石名列第4消失
沒看過要答案還要得理直氣壯 竟然還有人附和 不爽翻了
But killing by the Nationalists was also strategic and ideological. After
the initial cooperative period, they especially sought out communists or
communist sympathizers for execution. When defeating the communists in a
particular region and occupying or reoccupying it, they went so far as to
kill anyone they felt had cooperated with the communists or had been tainted
by them. In one military drive against the communist in 1934 to 1935, they
slaughtered or starved to death perhaps as many as 1,000,000 people.[2]
Moreover, especially during the 1940s, landlords and former officials who had
fled from communists or Japanese would follow in the train of Nationalist
soldiers and under military protection murder those peasants who they feared
or had a grudge against. While such killing may have numbered a few from
village to village, when these victims are added up over all the villages and
districts involved for well over a hundred-million people, than hundreds of
thousands were probably killed, just from this cause alone.
[2]Snow (1937, p. 186)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 128.146.146.225
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1456428775.A.2DE.html
→
02/26 03:34, , 1F
02/26 03:34, 1F
→
02/26 03:38, , 2F
02/26 03:38, 2F
你寫paper引文章的時候不就是假設作者是對的 要質疑就提出證據反駁啊
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 03:39:42
→
02/26 03:38, , 3F
02/26 03:38, 3F
你又知道那個腦補的在質疑什麼 我不就提出作者引用的出處 誰跟你繼續引用
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 03:41:18
→
02/26 03:56, , 4F
02/26 03:56, 4F
→
02/26 03:56, , 5F
02/26 03:56, 5F
所以我懶得翻 只有c/p
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:02:18
推
02/26 04:04, , 6F
02/26 04:04, 6F
→
02/26 04:05, , 7F
02/26 04:05, 7F
→
02/26 04:06, , 8F
02/26 04:06, 8F
感謝貼出連結 不過作者在這裡是直接引用China's Bloody Century的Ch1
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:15:41
→
02/26 04:15, , 9F
02/26 04:15, 9F
作者其實也有提到Democide死的人比戰死的人多 另外戰死的不算在殺人魔的kills喔^_<
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:17:32
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:18:16
推
02/26 04:20, , 10F
02/26 04:20, 10F
這麼想把美帝排進去就自己找資料證明Democide人數比九大殺人魔多不就得了
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:22:30
推
02/26 04:25, , 11F
02/26 04:25, 11F
→
02/26 04:27, , 12F
02/26 04:27, 12F
我覺得我用原文會更聳動
The twentieth Century's Bloodiest Megamurderers
二十世紀最血腥的謀殺者 如果你覺得美國排的進九大的話 那就十大殺人魔吧
反正我覺得沒差
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:32:06
→
02/26 04:30, , 13F
02/26 04:30, 13F
有什麼好帶的 你相信作者就說他排出的是九大殺人魔
最近重力波被發現 要不要說別被帶風向那只是個wave 量測精度到一個莫耳而已
推
02/26 04:30, , 14F
02/26 04:30, 14F
+ cks認為你跟共產黨有關的人
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:34:30
→
02/26 04:34, , 15F
02/26 04:34, 15F
Demo-cide People or society-死 答案是YES
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:41:41
推
02/26 04:40, , 16F
02/26 04:40, 16F
→
02/26 04:41, , 17F
02/26 04:41, 17F
→
02/26 04:42, , 18F
02/26 04:42, 18F
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.146.225), 02/26/2016 04:45:26
推
02/26 04:48, , 19F
02/26 04:48, 19F
→
02/26 04:48, , 20F
02/26 04:48, 20F
還有 28 則推文
還有 28 段內文
→
02/26 15:37, , 49F
02/26 15:37, 49F
唉 多看書吧 一直嘴就可以說出真理嗎
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.249.202), 02/26/2016 15:39:36
→
02/26 15:38, , 50F
02/26 15:38, 50F
→
02/26 15:38, , 51F
02/26 15:38, 51F
自己不讀書 又要我幫你找答案 怎麼會有這麼無恥的人
→
02/26 15:38, , 52F
02/26 15:38, 52F
→
02/26 15:40, , 53F
02/26 15:40, 53F
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.249.202), 02/26/2016 15:41:35
我貼的是其中一個來源 都說你腦補不看書了
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.249.202), 02/26/2016 15:42:32
→
02/26 15:42, , 54F
02/26 15:42, 54F
→
02/26 15:43, , 55F
02/26 15:43, 55F
一直嘴 不看書 又愛腦補 為台灣的教育感到悲哀
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.249.202), 02/26/2016 15:44:03
→
02/26 15:43, , 56F
02/26 15:43, 56F
→
02/26 15:44, , 57F
02/26 15:44, 57F
我都說另一本書有其他數據來源不只snow 聽不懂人話嗎
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.249.202), 02/26/2016 15:45:52
你看完書再回我一篇 懶得一直回來改文
※ 編輯: speedup (128.146.249.202), 02/26/2016 15:46:49
推
02/26 15:48, , 58F
02/26 15:48, 58F
→
02/26 15:49, , 59F
02/26 15:49, 59F
→
02/26 15:50, , 60F
02/26 15:50, 60F
→
02/26 15:51, , 61F
02/26 15:51, 61F
→
02/26 15:52, , 62F
02/26 15:52, 62F
→
02/26 15:52, , 63F
02/26 15:52, 63F
→
02/26 15:54, , 64F
02/26 15:54, 64F
噓
02/26 16:14, , 65F
02/26 16:14, 65F
→
02/26 16:15, , 66F
02/26 16:15, 66F
→
02/26 16:16, , 67F
02/26 16:16, 67F
→
02/26 16:16, , 68F
02/26 16:16, 68F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 14 篇):