Re: [閒聊] C狐 為什麼不像孔梅那麽萬用
C狐真的是一隻很可愛的角色
但是如果給C狐一個NP技會變怎樣呢?
1.咒術強化增加NP
最短的降氣技能
還加上NP
一堆吸血角大概都哭暈在廁所裡
本身寶具充電減CD又夠快
你就看C狐整場跳舞跳到腿斷
2.變化強化增加NP
C狐的保命技
開下去比吃小藥丸還要硬
CD不長 配上自身加NP也行
算是最不破壞平衡的加法
3.狐嫁強化增加NP
C狐核心技能
不要講50%那種瞎機八扯的幅度
20%我都覺得誇張
一個技能給你藍放 回血 NP
而且CD不算長
那你的不要講說藍卡打手怎樣
光是磨隊妹梅狐就可以更穩的磨到地老天荒
更何況是一般藍卡隊幫主打手充電
劍明狐可以直接從0到100 真的噁心
所以我個人會偏好真的要強化(雖然不需要)
那就是變化增加NP會比較好
雖然咒術增加NP才是最合理的
至於狐嫁就不要做夢了
以下可愛狐狸充數
https://i.imgur.com/Sf5AFiN.jpg



--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.8.196.251
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FATE_GO/M.1538092598.A.B3C.html
推
09/28 08:06, , 1F
09/28 08:06, 1F
推
09/28 08:13, , 2F
09/28 08:13, 2F
推
09/28 08:27, , 3F
09/28 08:27, 3F
推
09/28 08:31, , 4F
09/28 08:31, 4F
→
09/28 08:31, , 5F
09/28 08:31, 5F
推
09/28 08:33, , 6F
09/28 08:33, 6F
推
09/28 08:42, , 7F
09/28 08:42, 7F
變化其實不差
但是這遊戲非迴避以上的防禦技其實都滿爛的
因為高難度要爆擊都爆爽爽
防禦技通常覆蓋率低
常常會有開防禦技後對面根本不打你的情況發生
※ 編輯: ben010302 (101.8.196.251), 09/28/2018 08:51:01
推
09/28 08:51, , 8F
09/28 08:51, 8F
推
09/28 08:54, , 9F
09/28 08:54, 9F
→
09/28 08:54, , 10F
09/28 08:54, 10F
推
09/28 09:13, , 11F
09/28 09:13, 11F
推
09/28 09:15, , 12F
09/28 09:15, 12F
→
09/28 09:19, , 13F
09/28 09:19, 13F
我覺得不刑
推
09/28 09:22, , 14F
09/28 09:22, 14F
先抽爆殺職狐狸好嗎?
推
09/28 09:42, , 15F
09/28 09:42, 15F
推
09/28 09:50, , 16F
09/28 09:50, 16F
→
09/28 09:50, , 17F
09/28 09:50, 17F
推
09/28 09:59, , 18F
09/28 09:59, 18F
變化是唯一我覺得改完不會太破壞平衡的
推
09/28 10:04, , 19F
09/28 10:04, 19F
推
09/28 10:08, , 20F
09/28 10:08, 20F
推
09/28 10:08, , 21F
09/28 10:08, 21F
→
09/28 10:08, , 22F
09/28 10:08, 22F
真的
→
09/28 10:09, , 23F
09/28 10:09, 23F
推
09/28 10:19, , 24F
09/28 10:19, 24F
推
09/28 10:27, , 25F
09/28 10:27, 25F
變化真的坦
推
09/28 10:29, , 26F
09/28 10:29, 26F
※ 編輯: ben010302 (101.8.196.251), 09/28/2018 10:34:03
推
09/28 10:49, , 27F
09/28 10:49, 27F
推
09/28 10:50, , 28F
09/28 10:50, 28F
→
09/28 10:50, , 29F
09/28 10:50, 29F
→
09/28 10:51, , 30F
09/28 10:51, 30F
→
09/28 10:53, , 31F
09/28 10:53, 31F
推
09/28 10:54, , 32F
09/28 10:54, 32F
→
09/28 10:56, , 33F
09/28 10:56, 33F
→
09/28 10:56, , 34F
09/28 10:56, 34F
推
09/28 10:56, , 35F
09/28 10:56, 35F
→
09/28 10:58, , 36F
09/28 10:58, 36F
推
09/28 10:58, , 37F
09/28 10:58, 37F
推
09/28 10:59, , 38F
09/28 10:59, 38F
推
09/28 11:00, , 39F
09/28 11:00, 39F
推
09/28 11:00, , 40F
09/28 11:00, 40F
→
09/28 11:03, , 41F
09/28 11:03, 41F
→
09/28 11:04, , 42F
09/28 11:04, 42F
推
09/28 11:07, , 43F
09/28 11:07, 43F
推
09/28 11:15, , 44F
09/28 11:15, 44F
推
09/28 11:17, , 45F
09/28 11:17, 45F
→
09/28 11:17, , 46F
09/28 11:17, 46F
→
09/28 11:31, , 47F
09/28 11:31, 47F
→
09/28 11:48, , 48F
09/28 11:48, 48F
推
09/28 11:51, , 49F
09/28 11:51, 49F
→
09/28 11:51, , 50F
09/28 11:51, 50F
推
09/28 12:02, , 51F
09/28 12:02, 51F
推
09/28 12:04, , 52F
09/28 12:04, 52F
→
09/28 12:06, , 53F
09/28 12:06, 53F
推
09/28 12:08, , 54F
09/28 12:08, 54F
推
09/28 12:17, , 55F
09/28 12:17, 55F
推
09/28 12:31, , 56F
09/28 12:31, 56F
推
09/28 13:17, , 57F
09/28 13:17, 57F
→
09/28 13:17, , 58F
09/28 13:17, 58F
推
09/28 13:35, , 59F
09/28 13:35, 59F
推
09/28 13:42, , 60F
09/28 13:42, 60F
→
09/28 13:42, , 61F
09/28 13:42, 61F
→
09/28 13:44, , 62F
09/28 13:44, 62F
→
09/28 14:06, , 63F
09/28 14:06, 63F
推
09/28 14:08, , 64F
09/28 14:08, 64F
→
09/28 14:11, , 65F
09/28 14:11, 65F
推
09/28 14:27, , 66F
09/28 14:27, 66F
→
09/28 14:27, , 67F
09/28 14:27, 67F
→
09/28 14:27, , 68F
09/28 14:27, 68F
→
09/28 14:28, , 69F
09/28 14:28, 69F
→
09/28 14:47, , 70F
09/28 14:47, 70F
→
09/28 14:49, , 71F
09/28 14:49, 71F
推
09/28 14:52, , 72F
09/28 14:52, 72F
推
09/28 15:01, , 73F
09/28 15:01, 73F
推
09/28 15:03, , 74F
09/28 15:03, 74F
推
09/28 15:04, , 75F
09/28 15:04, 75F
→
09/28 15:09, , 76F
09/28 15:09, 76F
推
09/28 15:31, , 77F
09/28 15:31, 77F
→
09/28 15:31, , 78F
09/28 15:31, 78F
推
09/28 15:40, , 79F
09/28 15:40, 79F
推
09/28 16:19, , 80F
09/28 16:19, 80F

推
09/28 16:21, , 81F
09/28 16:21, 81F
推
09/28 18:03, , 82F
09/28 18:03, 82F
→
09/28 18:03, , 83F
09/28 18:03, 83F
→
09/28 18:03, , 84F
09/28 18:03, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)

