[請益] taipei times 節錄

看板Eng-Class作者 (閒閒沒事做)時間12年前 (2013/10/25 11:18), 編輯推噓4(4015)
留言19則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/5 (看更多)
“They have been slow to react to the fact that the market has changed. It gives them a huge advantage in economies of scale to build just one model, but they could have four or five. Look at the Mac [computer range] — they have those in all sorts of different sizes and shapes and configurations,” Brazier said. Horace Dediu, who runs the Asymco consultancy, reckoned Apple was more likely to offer a US$100 or US$150 phone — to minimize “cannibalization” of its top-end range. “Apple is happy to expand its portfolio in the Mac, iPod and iPad. Why should the iPhone be exempt?” he said. 不懂cannibalization的意思,請版友幫忙解答謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.220.206.157

10/25 11:25, , 1F
cannibalize是同類相殘;相食的意思 像人類吃人肉
10/25 11:25, 1F

10/25 11:26, , 2F
所以意思是Apple較有可能推出$100或$150的手機
10/25 11:26, 2F

10/25 11:26, , 3F
以盡量避免"同類相殘"到自家高價位的手機或產品
10/25 11:26, 3F

10/25 11:55, , 4F
所以apple是希望減少蠶食自家高階的機種
10/25 11:55, 4F

10/25 12:08, , 5F
有點差異,是儘量不生產,而不是減少生產
10/25 12:08, 5F

10/25 12:11, , 6F
而且原文是生產中低價位手機,跟減少生產無關
10/25 12:11, 6F

10/26 00:54, , 7F
"tim760323:所以apple是..."-> Yes.
10/26 00:54, 7F

10/26 01:31, , 8F
minimize ... 指的是對原本高階機種市場的影響減至最低的
10/26 01:31, 8F

10/26 01:32, , 9F
程度(還是會有影響,只是儘量把危害程度降到最低程度)
10/26 01:32, 9F

10/26 01:34, , 10F
這和"儘量不生產"無關 -- iPhone在這之前沒有低階市場(沒
10/26 01:34, 10F

10/26 01:34, , 11F
有低價位機型),所以可以說是沒有低階市場。如果這次的低
10/26 01:34, 11F

10/26 01:35, , 12F
階機型/市場需求量大的話Apple不會"刻意"儘量不生產低階機
10/26 01:35, 12F

10/26 01:36, , 13F
型iPhone-- 低階市場和高階市場基本上是分開的,所以影響
10/26 01:36, 13F

10/26 01:36, , 14F
程度低,所以文章那人才說這策略能夠 minimize ...)
10/26 01:36, 14F

10/26 03:59, , 15F
我覺得你誤會我的意思了 我指的是盡量避免生產同樣高
10/26 03:59, 15F

10/26 03:59, , 16F
價位的手機 而改生產低價位的手機 不是盡量不生產低階
10/26 03:59, 16F

10/26 03:59, , 17F
機種
10/26 03:59, 17F

10/26 04:01, , 18F
就像你說的 高低階是分開的 而他們之前沒有低階市場
10/26 04:01, 18F

10/26 04:16, , 19F
再說就算是盡量不生產低階手機也跟原文有所出入
10/26 04:16, 19F
文章代碼(AID): #1IQUCS-J (Eng-Class)
文章代碼(AID): #1IQUCS-J (Eng-Class)