[文法] 疑問詞為主詞的辨別法?

看板Eng-Class作者 (Vita borghese)時間15年前 (2010/11/23 09:41), 編輯推噓4(4推 0噓 32→)
留言36則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
如何分別疑問詞為主詞或受詞 坊間專書跟網路搜尋我都找過了 雖知道大概的分別法 但是以下這幾句讓我百思不解 What do you think is the situation? What do you consider is the tone of the speaker? 這兩句為原來的句子插入 do you think 來詢問對方意見 但是書上說 他的原句 What is the situation? 和 What is the tone of the speaker? 的疑問詞What在句中為主詞 但是不管用中文或用英文想 What is the situation? 的回答應該是 The situation is XXX. 而不是 XXX is the situation.吧 what怎會是主詞 What do you consider is the tone of the speaker? 回答也應該是The tone of the speaker is XXX. what應該是受詞補語不是主詞 所以這兩句加入do you think/consider應該是 What do you think the situation is? 和 What do you consider the tone of the speaker is? 才對吧 煩請文法高手解釋!! 難道課本寫錯了@@"? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.130.251.250
→
11/23 12:26, , 1F
"而不是..... 吧 what怎會是主詞"-> "what"是否是什麼詞
11/23 12:26, 1F
→
11/23 12:27, , 2F
不是由答句來決定的。答句的句型是答句句型，問句的是問句
11/23 12:27, 2F
→
11/23 12:27, , 3F
的句型. 另外就是"XXX is the situation"不是沒有。比如
11/23 12:27, 3F
→
11/23 12:28, , 4F
That is the situation.
11/23 12:28, 4F
→
11/23 12:33, , 5F
"what是主詞"這部分不要想得太鑽.它只是在整句中"看"起來
11/23 12:33, 5F
→
11/23 12:34, , 6F
像是主詞(它本身也是pronoun(或是其它"術語"，字典上有:
11/23 12:34, 6F
→
11/23 12:34, , 7F
11/23 12:34, 7F
→
11/23 12:35, , 8F
然後也是疑問詞--和單純的直述句子比較起來它的位置功能
11/23 12:35, 8F
→
11/23 12:36, , 9F
詞性都*像*是主詞(名詞) 就這樣，很單純。剩下的你只是要
11/23 12:36, 9F
→
11/23 12:37, , 10F
熟悉這用法 (文法上有時候不同學者會有不同看法，所以不需
11/23 12:37, 10F
→
11/23 12:37, , 11F
要 *一定得是* XXX文法才可以。很多時候挑一個"方便記"的
11/23 12:37, 11F
→
11/23 12:38, , 12F
文法解釋來幫助你記憶某特定用法就很夠了
11/23 12:38, 12F
→
11/23 15:23, , 13F
那請問結論到底哪個用法對?
11/23 15:23, 13F
→
11/23 15:25, , 14F
What即使再問句也有當主詞跟受詞補語的差別,
11/23 15:25, 14F
→
11/23 15:25, , 15F
請真正了解再來回文好嗎?
11/23 15:25, 15F
推
11/23 15:56, , 16F
原波講的沒錯..
11/23 15:56, 16F
→
11/23 15:57, , 17F
What do you think the situation is? 才對
11/23 15:57, 17F
→
11/23 15:57, , 18F
What do you think is the situation? 錯誤
11/23 15:57, 18F
→
11/23 15:57, , 19F
用簡單的例子來看:
11/23 15:57, 19F
→
11/23 15:58, , 20F
What do you think it is? => 正確的講法
11/23 15:58, 20F
→
11/23 15:58, , 21F
What do you think is it? => 錯誤
11/23 15:58, 21F
→
11/23 15:59, , 22F
另外,關於"分別疑問詞當主詞或受詞"
11/23 15:59, 22F
→
11/23 16:00, , 23F
原波大剛好舉了一個非常詭異的例子: Be動詞
11/23 16:00, 23F
→
11/23 16:01, , 24F
因為be動詞的構句中,主詞和受詞是可以互換的
11/23 16:01, 24F
→
11/23 16:02, , 25F
This is your card. => Your card is this.
11/23 16:02, 25F
→
11/23 16:03, , 26F
轉成疑問句:
11/23 16:03, 26F
→
11/23 16:04, , 27F
(1) What is my card? This is your card.
11/23 16:04, 27F
→
11/23 16:04, , 28F
(2) What is this? This is your card.
11/23 16:04, 28F
→
11/23 16:05, , 29F
(What當主詞或受詞,很難就字面上去判斷)
11/23 16:05, 29F
→
11/23 16:05, , 30F
但如果是be動詞以外的動詞,就很容易判斷:
11/23 16:05, 30F
→
11/23 16:06, , 31F
Who did that? (who當主詞)
11/23 16:06, 31F
→
11/23 16:06, , 32F
Who did you see? (who當受詞)
11/23 16:06, 32F
推
11/23 16:08, , 33F
但不管what是主詞還是補語..
11/23 16:08, 33F
→
11/23 16:09, , 34F
PS 我上面有打錯..主詞或補語而非主詞或受詞..orz
11/23 16:09, 34F
推
11/23 22:48, , 35F
原PO這問題應該是龍騰第三冊第七課
11/23 22:48, 35F
‣ 更多 beatrice1009 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1CwnkkpC (Eng-Class)
‣ 更多 beatrice1009 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1CwnkkpC (Eng-Class)