[問題] 為何布瑪在香港叫莊子 克林叫無限?
布瑪在香港被翻成莊子
克林變成無限
除此之外其它人的名字在香港都還算正常
不論是音譯跟意譯應該都不會譯成這樣吧?
有人知道為何要譯成莊子跟無限嗎?難道是因為克林可以無限復活的緣故嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.9.65.129
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DragonBall/M.1473252133.A.700.html
推
09/07 21:14, , 1F
09/07 21:14, 1F
推
09/07 21:21, , 2F
09/07 21:21, 2F
推
09/07 22:05, , 3F
09/07 22:05, 3F
推
09/07 22:11, , 4F
09/07 22:11, 4F
推
09/07 22:18, , 5F
09/07 22:18, 5F
→
09/07 22:24, , 6F
09/07 22:24, 6F
→
09/07 22:24, , 7F
09/07 22:24, 7F
→
09/07 22:33, , 8F
09/07 22:33, 8F
推
09/07 22:48, , 9F
09/07 22:48, 9F
推
09/07 22:58, , 10F
09/07 22:58, 10F
推
09/07 23:08, , 11F
09/07 23:08, 11F
推
09/07 23:26, , 12F
09/07 23:26, 12F
→
09/07 23:28, , 13F
09/07 23:28, 13F
推
09/07 23:33, , 14F
09/07 23:33, 14F
→
09/07 23:33, , 15F
09/07 23:33, 15F
推
09/07 23:38, , 16F
09/07 23:38, 16F
→
09/07 23:38, , 17F
09/07 23:38, 17F
推
09/07 23:40, , 18F
09/07 23:40, 18F
推
09/07 23:45, , 19F
09/07 23:45, 19F
推
09/08 00:03, , 20F
09/08 00:03, 20F
→
09/08 00:03, , 21F
09/08 00:03, 21F
推
09/08 00:07, , 22F
09/08 00:07, 22F
→
09/08 00:07, , 23F
09/08 00:07, 23F
推
09/08 00:22, , 24F
09/08 00:22, 24F
推
09/08 00:43, , 25F
09/08 00:43, 25F
推
09/08 02:23, , 26F
09/08 02:23, 26F
→
09/08 02:26, , 27F
09/08 02:26, 27F
→
09/08 02:27, , 28F
09/08 02:27, 28F
→
09/08 02:28, , 29F
09/08 02:28, 29F
→
09/08 05:58, , 30F
09/08 05:58, 30F
推
09/08 07:16, , 31F
09/08 07:16, 31F
→
09/08 12:53, , 32F
09/08 12:53, 32F
→
09/08 13:17, , 33F
09/08 13:17, 33F
推
09/08 14:50, , 34F
09/08 14:50, 34F
推
09/08 17:49, , 35F
09/08 17:49, 35F
推
09/08 19:32, , 36F
09/08 19:32, 36F
推
09/08 19:38, , 37F
09/08 19:38, 37F
推
09/08 21:50, , 38F
09/08 21:50, 38F
→
09/08 21:51, , 39F
09/08 21:51, 39F
→
09/08 21:52, , 40F
09/08 21:52, 40F
推
09/08 23:31, , 41F
09/08 23:31, 41F
→
09/08 23:31, , 42F
09/08 23:31, 42F
→
09/08 23:31, , 43F
09/08 23:31, 43F
→
09/09 00:58, , 44F
09/09 00:58, 44F
→
09/09 00:59, , 45F
09/09 00:59, 45F
推
09/10 17:41, , 46F
09/10 17:41, 46F
推
09/12 00:50, , 47F
09/12 00:50, 47F
推
09/12 23:14, , 48F
09/12 23:14, 48F
→
09/12 23:14, , 49F
09/12 23:14, 49F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):