[問題] 金庸老手要古龍入門的話該怎麼看?已回收
看大家討論古龍的文看到都熱起來了,
好像很好看...
可是又好像不是很好看??
因為有人提到說要靠自己的想像力來拆解招式?
(像是那個天外飛仙、飛來橫禍?)
金庸我應該算是老手了...
當年高中上課時期幾乎是把每一部最少都看過兩遍,
大家比較耳熟能詳的射鵰三部、笑傲江湖、鹿鼎記等都至少四遍,
不過現在已經是30的人父了...
劇情多少也是有點忘了,
像是金庸要入門的話幾乎是先推射鵰三部不用說,
也因為看過小說原著,
只要有電視劇的話我是幾乎不太看的....(因為我都會邊看邊罵這怎演的)
很多小說內的對招的一招兩式其實就可以寫一頁半頁的,
給電視演大概氣功亂噴一下就沒了??
完全沒有意境跟那個險境的存在感!
然後要說金庸很像RPG的話我是不這麼覺得就是....
小說內可是描述了很多主角的心路歷程,
只是都被電視劇簡化的像是突然大躍升等一樣。
可是古龍的話作品好像琳瑯滿目的....
完全不知道是要怎麼入門?
也不知道哪幾部是有什麼關聯,
電視劇或是電影的話每次看到古龍的總是提不起興緻不知道是啥原因,
根本幾乎都是搞笑片?
記得以前也有到書店翻看古龍的書,
可是總好像食不下嚥= =
古龍的總冊是不是比金庸多啊?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.173.149.219
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1506235193.A.7F2.html
→
09/24 14:41, , 1F
09/24 14:41, 1F
推
09/24 14:43, , 2F
09/24 14:43, 2F
→
09/24 14:43, , 3F
09/24 14:43, 3F
→
09/24 14:43, , 4F
09/24 14:43, 4F
推
09/24 14:43, , 5F
09/24 14:43, 5F
推
09/24 14:44, , 6F
09/24 14:44, 6F
推
09/24 14:44, , 7F
09/24 14:44, 7F
→
09/24 14:44, , 8F
09/24 14:44, 8F
→
09/24 14:44, , 9F
09/24 14:44, 9F
→
09/24 14:44, , 10F
09/24 14:44, 10F
→
09/24 14:44, , 11F
09/24 14:44, 11F
→
09/24 14:46, , 12F
09/24 14:46, 12F
推
09/24 14:46, , 13F
09/24 14:46, 13F
推
09/24 14:46, , 14F
09/24 14:46, 14F
→
09/24 14:46, , 15F
09/24 14:46, 15F
推
09/24 14:46, , 16F
09/24 14:46, 16F
→
09/24 14:47, , 17F
09/24 14:47, 17F
→
09/24 14:47, , 18F
09/24 14:47, 18F
推
09/24 14:48, , 19F
09/24 14:48, 19F
→
09/24 14:48, , 20F
09/24 14:48, 20F
→
09/24 14:48, , 21F
09/24 14:48, 21F
→
09/24 14:48, , 22F
09/24 14:48, 22F
推
09/24 14:50, , 23F
09/24 14:50, 23F
→
09/24 14:50, , 24F
09/24 14:50, 24F
推
09/24 14:50, , 25F
09/24 14:50, 25F
→
09/24 14:51, , 26F
09/24 14:51, 26F
→
09/24 14:53, , 27F
09/24 14:53, 27F
推
09/24 14:53, , 28F
09/24 14:53, 28F
→
09/24 14:53, , 29F
09/24 14:53, 29F
→
09/24 14:54, , 30F
09/24 14:54, 30F
推
09/24 14:55, , 31F
09/24 14:55, 31F
→
09/24 14:55, , 32F
09/24 14:55, 32F
→
09/24 14:55, , 33F
09/24 14:55, 33F
→
09/24 14:59, , 34F
09/24 14:59, 34F
推
09/24 14:59, , 35F
09/24 14:59, 35F
→
09/24 14:59, , 36F
09/24 14:59, 36F
推
09/24 15:01, , 37F
09/24 15:01, 37F
→
09/24 15:02, , 38F
09/24 15:02, 38F
→
09/24 15:02, , 39F
09/24 15:02, 39F
還有 22 則推文
→
09/24 15:22, , 62F
09/24 15:22, 62F
→
09/24 15:23, , 63F
09/24 15:23, 63F
推
09/24 15:23, , 64F
09/24 15:23, 64F
→
09/24 15:24, , 65F
09/24 15:24, 65F
推
09/24 15:34, , 66F
09/24 15:34, 66F
推
09/24 15:37, , 67F
09/24 15:37, 67F
推
09/24 15:39, , 68F
09/24 15:39, 68F
→
09/24 15:40, , 69F
09/24 15:40, 69F
→
09/24 15:40, , 70F
09/24 15:40, 70F
→
09/24 15:40, , 71F
09/24 15:40, 71F
→
09/24 15:41, , 72F
09/24 15:41, 72F
→
09/24 15:41, , 73F
09/24 15:41, 73F
→
09/24 15:41, , 74F
09/24 15:41, 74F
→
09/24 15:41, , 75F
09/24 15:41, 75F
推
09/24 15:42, , 76F
09/24 15:42, 76F
→
09/24 15:42, , 77F
09/24 15:42, 77F
→
09/24 15:42, , 78F
09/24 15:42, 78F
→
09/24 15:49, , 79F
09/24 15:49, 79F
→
09/24 15:54, , 80F
09/24 15:54, 80F
推
09/24 15:56, , 81F
09/24 15:56, 81F
→
09/24 15:56, , 82F
09/24 15:56, 82F
推
09/24 16:00, , 83F
09/24 16:00, 83F
推
09/24 16:09, , 84F
09/24 16:09, 84F
→
09/24 16:25, , 85F
09/24 16:25, 85F
推
09/24 16:31, , 86F
09/24 16:31, 86F
→
09/24 16:32, , 87F
09/24 16:32, 87F
→
09/24 16:33, , 88F
09/24 16:33, 88F
推
09/24 16:39, , 89F
09/24 16:39, 89F
→
09/24 16:40, , 90F
09/24 16:40, 90F
→
09/24 17:24, , 91F
09/24 17:24, 91F
推
09/24 17:29, , 92F
09/24 17:29, 92F
推
09/24 17:33, , 93F
09/24 17:33, 93F
→
09/24 17:33, , 94F
09/24 17:33, 94F
→
09/24 17:34, , 95F
09/24 17:34, 95F
推
09/24 17:56, , 96F
09/24 17:56, 96F
推
09/24 19:17, , 97F
09/24 19:17, 97F
推
09/24 19:44, , 98F
09/24 19:44, 98F
推
09/24 20:13, , 99F
09/24 20:13, 99F
→
09/24 20:13, , 100F
09/24 20:13, 100F
推
09/25 01:22, , 101F
09/25 01:22, 101F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):