[討論] 如果閃躲子彈可行,那肉搏戰會很不科學已回收
閃躲子彈之前討論到爛掉,結論就是劇情效果而已,真實人體辦不到
那如果反過來假設已經具備閃躲甚至擊落子彈的反應力和肉體強度
那改打肉搏戰的時候會是什麼場景?感覺會出現每秒出三百拳的畫面XD
很像是隨時可以用肉眼看不清的速度行動,還不會造成身體負擔
但是動畫演出又沒有那種感覺(獵人王宮戰有標秒數有差w)
如果完全沒有用緩速演出,我們看動畫肉搏戰應該都是幾秒內結束
但是其他作品的戰鬥應該說為了帥,這種矛盾就一直存在著
不過也沒差就是好看啊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.217.165.169
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1486021072.A.36A.html
推
02/02 15:38, , 1F
02/02 15:38, 1F
推
02/02 15:38, , 2F
02/02 15:38, 2F
→
02/02 15:39, , 3F
02/02 15:39, 3F
推
02/02 15:39, , 4F
02/02 15:39, 4F
推
02/02 15:39, , 5F
02/02 15:39, 5F
推
02/02 15:40, , 6F
02/02 15:40, 6F
→
02/02 15:40, , 7F
02/02 15:40, 7F
→
02/02 15:40, , 8F
02/02 15:40, 8F
推
02/02 15:40, , 9F
02/02 15:40, 9F
→
02/02 15:41, , 10F
02/02 15:41, 10F
→
02/02 15:41, , 11F
02/02 15:41, 11F
推
02/02 15:41, , 12F
02/02 15:41, 12F
推
02/02 15:42, , 13F
02/02 15:42, 13F
推
02/02 15:42, , 14F
02/02 15:42, 14F
推
02/02 15:42, , 15F
02/02 15:42, 15F
推
02/02 15:42, , 16F
02/02 15:42, 16F
→
02/02 15:43, , 17F
02/02 15:43, 17F
→
02/02 15:43, , 18F
02/02 15:43, 18F
推
02/02 15:44, , 19F
02/02 15:44, 19F
→
02/02 15:45, , 20F
02/02 15:45, 20F
→
02/02 15:45, , 21F
02/02 15:45, 21F
推
02/02 15:45, , 22F
02/02 15:45, 22F
→
02/02 15:46, , 23F
02/02 15:46, 23F
→
02/02 15:52, , 24F
02/02 15:52, 24F
→
02/02 15:53, , 25F
02/02 15:53, 25F
→
02/02 15:53, , 26F
02/02 15:53, 26F
→
02/02 15:56, , 27F
02/02 15:56, 27F
推
02/02 15:56, , 28F
02/02 15:56, 28F
推
02/02 15:56, , 29F
02/02 15:56, 29F
→
02/02 16:02, , 30F
02/02 16:02, 30F
→
02/02 16:02, , 31F
02/02 16:02, 31F
推
02/02 16:06, , 32F
02/02 16:06, 32F
→
02/02 16:07, , 33F
02/02 16:07, 33F
→
02/02 16:28, , 34F
02/02 16:28, 34F
→
02/02 16:32, , 35F
02/02 16:32, 35F
→
02/02 16:33, , 36F
02/02 16:33, 36F
→
02/02 16:34, , 37F
02/02 16:34, 37F
推
02/02 16:36, , 38F
02/02 16:36, 38F
→
02/02 16:36, , 39F
02/02 16:36, 39F
→
02/02 16:41, , 40F
02/02 16:41, 40F
→
02/02 16:41, , 41F
02/02 16:41, 41F
推
02/02 16:45, , 42F
02/02 16:45, 42F
→
02/02 16:48, , 43F
02/02 16:48, 43F
推
02/02 16:58, , 44F
02/02 16:58, 44F
推
02/02 17:00, , 45F
02/02 17:00, 45F
→
02/02 17:00, , 46F
02/02 17:00, 46F
→
02/02 17:00, , 47F
02/02 17:00, 47F
推
02/02 17:22, , 48F
02/02 17:22, 48F
推
02/02 17:28, , 49F
02/02 17:28, 49F
推
02/02 17:40, , 50F
02/02 17:40, 50F
推
02/02 17:52, , 51F
02/02 17:52, 51F
推
02/02 18:56, , 52F
02/02 18:56, 52F
→
02/02 18:56, , 53F
02/02 18:56, 53F
→
02/03 10:10, , 54F
02/03 10:10, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):