[閒聊] 志志雄的戰鬥力描寫是否有些失敗?已回收
無庸置疑 志志雄是動漫界極具魅力的反派
死後打算統一地獄的一幕更是神劍經典中的經典
不過作品中呈現他戰鬥力的Boss戰感覺有點平淡
簡言之,志志雄的特色就是血厚+噴火特效
就以他的大弟子宗次郎為比較基準
面對第一級縮地+瞬天殺
劍心有神速+天翔龍閃,那雄哥呢?
更何況宗次郎是拿真刀,他真的打的贏自己的弟子嗎?
而且還有個最終絕招pk的小疑惑
火產靈神敗給天翔龍閃原因是真空高速吸引
But~
向前進不就是當時雄哥應該的動作嗎?
搭配吸引力加速劍心還沒揮第二刀就GG惹~
還是只能歸於主角威能嗎?
--
Kaneshiro5:"笑えばいいと思うよ"
綾波レイ :"私が守るもの Kaneshiro5 ♥♥♥♥♥ "
http://i.imgur.com/HORDXVh.gif
![](https://i.imgur.com/HORDXVh.jpg)
![](https://i.imgur.com/weLm6kZ.jpg)
![](https://i.imgur.com/Npf8gYt.jpg)
![](https://i.imgur.com/l2839B1.jpg)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.83.99.6
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1478086234.A.844.html
推
11/02 19:31, , 1F
11/02 19:31, 1F
推
11/02 19:32, , 2F
11/02 19:32, 2F
推
11/02 19:32, , 3F
11/02 19:32, 3F
→
11/02 19:32, , 4F
11/02 19:32, 4F
→
11/02 19:33, , 5F
11/02 19:33, 5F
→
11/02 19:33, , 6F
11/02 19:33, 6F
→
11/02 19:34, , 7F
11/02 19:34, 7F
→
11/02 19:34, , 8F
11/02 19:34, 8F
→
11/02 19:34, , 9F
11/02 19:34, 9F
→
11/02 19:36, , 10F
11/02 19:36, 10F
推
11/02 19:37, , 11F
11/02 19:37, 11F
推
11/02 19:39, , 12F
11/02 19:39, 12F
→
11/02 19:40, , 13F
11/02 19:40, 13F
→
11/02 19:42, , 14F
11/02 19:42, 14F
→
11/02 19:42, , 15F
11/02 19:42, 15F
→
11/02 19:43, , 16F
11/02 19:43, 16F
→
11/02 19:43, , 17F
11/02 19:43, 17F
推
11/02 19:44, , 18F
11/02 19:44, 18F
推
11/02 19:45, , 19F
11/02 19:45, 19F
推
11/02 19:46, , 20F
11/02 19:46, 20F
→
11/02 19:46, , 21F
11/02 19:46, 21F
→
11/02 19:47, , 22F
11/02 19:47, 22F
推
11/02 19:47, , 23F
11/02 19:47, 23F
推
11/02 19:47, , 24F
11/02 19:47, 24F
→
11/02 19:47, , 25F
11/02 19:47, 25F
→
11/02 19:47, , 26F
11/02 19:47, 26F
推
11/02 19:49, , 27F
11/02 19:49, 27F
推
11/02 19:49, , 28F
11/02 19:49, 28F
→
11/02 19:50, , 29F
11/02 19:50, 29F
→
11/02 19:50, , 30F
11/02 19:50, 30F
→
11/02 19:50, , 31F
11/02 19:50, 31F
→
11/02 19:50, , 32F
11/02 19:50, 32F
推
11/02 19:53, , 33F
11/02 19:53, 33F
推
11/02 19:54, , 34F
11/02 19:54, 34F
→
11/02 19:54, , 35F
11/02 19:54, 35F
→
11/02 19:54, , 36F
11/02 19:54, 36F
→
11/02 19:55, , 37F
11/02 19:55, 37F
推
11/02 19:55, , 38F
11/02 19:55, 38F
→
11/02 19:55, , 39F
11/02 19:55, 39F
還有 85 則推文
→
11/02 20:20, , 125F
11/02 20:20, 125F
→
11/02 20:20, , 126F
11/02 20:20, 126F
→
11/02 20:20, , 127F
11/02 20:20, 127F
→
11/02 20:20, , 128F
11/02 20:20, 128F
→
11/02 20:20, , 129F
11/02 20:20, 129F
推
11/02 20:20, , 130F
11/02 20:20, 130F
→
11/02 20:22, , 131F
11/02 20:22, 131F
→
11/02 20:23, , 132F
11/02 20:23, 132F
推
11/02 20:24, , 133F
11/02 20:24, 133F
→
11/02 20:25, , 134F
11/02 20:25, 134F
→
11/02 20:25, , 135F
11/02 20:25, 135F
→
11/02 20:28, , 136F
11/02 20:28, 136F
→
11/02 20:28, , 137F
11/02 20:28, 137F
推
11/02 20:28, , 138F
11/02 20:28, 138F
→
11/02 20:28, , 139F
11/02 20:28, 139F
→
11/02 20:30, , 140F
11/02 20:30, 140F
→
11/02 20:30, , 141F
11/02 20:30, 141F
推
11/02 20:31, , 142F
11/02 20:31, 142F
→
11/02 20:36, , 143F
11/02 20:36, 143F
→
11/02 20:36, , 144F
11/02 20:36, 144F
→
11/02 20:40, , 145F
11/02 20:40, 145F
→
11/02 20:41, , 146F
11/02 20:41, 146F
→
11/02 20:41, , 147F
11/02 20:41, 147F
→
11/02 20:51, , 148F
11/02 20:51, 148F
推
11/02 20:56, , 149F
11/02 20:56, 149F
推
11/02 20:58, , 150F
11/02 20:58, 150F
推
11/02 20:59, , 151F
11/02 20:59, 151F
→
11/02 21:00, , 152F
11/02 21:00, 152F
→
11/02 21:01, , 153F
11/02 21:01, 153F
推
11/02 21:06, , 154F
11/02 21:06, 154F
推
11/02 21:08, , 155F
11/02 21:08, 155F
→
11/02 21:08, , 156F
11/02 21:08, 156F
推
11/02 21:09, , 157F
11/02 21:09, 157F
→
11/02 21:25, , 158F
11/02 21:25, 158F
推
11/02 21:40, , 159F
11/02 21:40, 159F
推
11/02 21:41, , 160F
11/02 21:41, 160F
推
11/02 21:43, , 161F
11/02 21:43, 161F
推
11/03 07:51, , 162F
11/03 07:51, 162F
→
11/03 07:51, , 163F
11/03 07:51, 163F
推
11/03 13:38, , 164F
11/03 13:38, 164F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):