[閒聊] 砲灰屬性會對該角色有加分效果嗎?已回收
當知道一個角色注定是砲灰時 是什麼原因讓你繼續不離不棄的支持下去?
像是果青的結衣 管家的雛菊
我一直在想 這些99.99%會慘敗的角色 我為什麼不趕快把手中的股票出清?
難道說 正是因為她們是砲灰 才更惹人憐愛?
當然 一個角色並不會只是因為是砲灰而有魅力
今天隨便抓一個路人當砲灰 相信也沒什麼人在意
但是一個原本就很有魅力的角色變成砲灰 是不是會讓她們更加有魅力呢?
反過來說 當一個砲灰角色獲得讀者的超高人氣 是否砲灰屬性也是構成人氣的重要一環?
--
以下是能觸動我心弦 帶給我震撼的ACGN作品:
1. CLANNAD 2. 冰菓 3. 反叛的魯路修 4. 魔法少女小圓 5. LITTLE BUSTERS!
6. 來自風平浪靜的明天 7. 文學少女 8.請問您今天要來點兔子嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 119.14.80.221
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1462724334.A.D47.html
→
05/09 00:19, , 1F
05/09 00:19, 1F
面對現實吧 本篇的結衣就是個砲灰無誤
→
05/09 00:20, , 2F
05/09 00:20, 2F
→
05/09 00:20, , 3F
05/09 00:20, 3F
→
05/09 00:21, , 4F
05/09 00:21, 4F
→
05/09 00:21, , 5F
05/09 00:21, 5F
→
05/09 00:21, , 6F
05/09 00:21, 6F
推
05/09 00:21, , 7F
05/09 00:21, 7F
推
05/09 00:21, , 8F
05/09 00:21, 8F
推
05/09 00:22, , 9F
05/09 00:22, 9F
→
05/09 00:22, , 10F
05/09 00:22, 10F
推
05/09 00:22, , 11F
05/09 00:22, 11F
推
05/09 00:22, , 12F
05/09 00:22, 12F
推
05/09 00:23, , 13F
05/09 00:23, 13F
→
05/09 00:24, , 14F
05/09 00:24, 14F
※ 編輯: phoenix286 (119.14.80.221), 05/09/2016 00:25:49
推
05/09 00:24, , 15F
05/09 00:24, 15F
推
05/09 00:27, , 16F
05/09 00:27, 16F
推
05/09 00:27, , 17F
05/09 00:27, 17F
推
05/09 00:28, , 18F
05/09 00:28, 18F
→
05/09 00:28, , 19F
05/09 00:28, 19F
推
05/09 00:28, , 20F
05/09 00:28, 20F
推
05/09 00:29, , 21F
05/09 00:29, 21F
→
05/09 00:29, , 22F
05/09 00:29, 22F
※ 編輯: phoenix286 (119.14.80.221), 05/09/2016 00:29:32
推
05/09 00:29, , 23F
05/09 00:29, 23F
推
05/09 00:33, , 24F
05/09 00:33, 24F
推
05/09 00:33, , 25F
05/09 00:33, 25F
確實是這樣說沒錯啦 所以我預留了0.01%的空間XD
→
05/09 00:34, , 26F
05/09 00:34, 26F
推
05/09 00:36, , 27F
05/09 00:36, 27F
推
05/09 00:36, , 28F
05/09 00:36, 28F
→
05/09 00:36, , 29F
05/09 00:36, 29F
推
05/09 00:39, , 30F
05/09 00:39, 30F
推
05/09 00:40, , 31F
05/09 00:40, 31F
→
05/09 00:40, , 32F
05/09 00:40, 32F
推
05/09 00:40, , 33F
05/09 00:40, 33F
推
05/09 00:40, , 34F
05/09 00:40, 34F
→
05/09 00:41, , 35F
05/09 00:41, 35F
→
05/09 00:41, , 36F
05/09 00:41, 36F
→
05/09 00:41, , 37F
05/09 00:41, 37F
→
05/09 00:41, , 38F
05/09 00:41, 38F
→
05/09 00:41, , 39F
05/09 00:41, 39F
※ 編輯: phoenix286 (119.14.80.221), 05/09/2016 00:42:21
→
05/09 00:43, , 40F
05/09 00:43, 40F
推
05/09 00:43, , 41F
05/09 00:43, 41F
推
05/09 00:44, , 42F
05/09 00:44, 42F
推
05/09 00:45, , 43F
05/09 00:45, 43F
→
05/09 00:45, , 44F
05/09 00:45, 44F
推
05/09 00:46, , 45F
05/09 00:46, 45F
推
05/09 00:48, , 46F
05/09 00:48, 46F
推
05/09 00:48, , 47F
05/09 00:48, 47F
推
05/09 00:49, , 48F
05/09 00:49, 48F
→
05/09 00:49, , 49F
05/09 00:49, 49F
推
05/09 00:50, , 50F
05/09 00:50, 50F
推
05/09 00:51, , 51F
05/09 00:51, 51F
推
05/09 00:52, , 52F
05/09 00:52, 52F
推
05/09 00:53, , 53F
05/09 00:53, 53F
推
05/09 00:56, , 54F
05/09 00:56, 54F
推
05/09 01:08, , 55F
05/09 01:08, 55F
→
05/09 01:08, , 56F
05/09 01:08, 56F
→
05/09 01:08, , 57F
05/09 01:08, 57F
推
05/09 01:12, , 58F
05/09 01:12, 58F
推
05/09 01:19, , 59F
05/09 01:19, 59F
推
05/09 01:22, , 60F
05/09 01:22, 60F
→
05/09 01:23, , 61F
05/09 01:23, 61F
推
05/09 01:28, , 62F
05/09 01:28, 62F
→
05/09 01:32, , 63F
05/09 01:32, 63F
推
05/09 01:36, , 64F
05/09 01:36, 64F
→
05/09 01:36, , 65F
05/09 01:36, 65F
什麼意思? 我並沒有說作者覺得需要個砲灰 所以塑造結衣這個角色
※ 編輯: phoenix286 (119.14.80.221), 05/09/2016 01:56:26
推
05/09 02:09, , 66F
05/09 02:09, 66F
→
05/09 02:47, , 67F
05/09 02:47, 67F
→
05/09 02:52, , 68F
05/09 02:52, 68F
推
05/09 04:12, , 69F
05/09 04:12, 69F
推
05/09 06:53, , 70F
05/09 06:53, 70F
推
05/09 07:34, , 71F
05/09 07:34, 71F
推
05/09 08:35, , 72F
05/09 08:35, 72F
推
05/09 08:36, , 73F
05/09 08:36, 73F
→
05/09 08:36, , 74F
05/09 08:36, 74F
→
05/09 08:36, , 75F
05/09 08:36, 75F
推
05/09 09:04, , 76F
05/09 09:04, 76F
推
05/09 09:05, , 77F
05/09 09:05, 77F
推
05/09 09:23, , 78F
05/09 09:23, 78F
推
05/09 09:27, , 79F
05/09 09:27, 79F
推
05/09 09:41, , 80F
05/09 09:41, 80F
→
05/09 09:41, , 81F
05/09 09:41, 81F
→
05/09 09:41, , 82F
05/09 09:41, 82F
推
05/09 11:44, , 83F
05/09 11:44, 83F
推
05/09 12:16, , 84F
05/09 12:16, 84F
→
05/09 12:16, , 85F
05/09 12:16, 85F
推
05/09 14:09, , 86F
05/09 14:09, 86F
推
05/09 15:48, , 87F
05/09 15:48, 87F
推
05/09 17:32, , 88F
05/09 17:32, 88F
推
05/09 21:20, , 89F
05/09 21:20, 89F
→
05/09 21:20, , 90F
05/09 21:20, 90F
→
05/09 21:20, , 91F
05/09 21:20, 91F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):