[閒聊] 轉蛋遊戲中,低階卡片註定悲劇嗎?已回收
轉蛋遊戲基本上都有所謂的階級制度,形式不外乎
1.SSR>SR>R
2.五星>四星>三星
玩過幾款遊戲,三星或R的卡片基本上都只能用一條樂來形容
好一點還可以在遊戲前幾天派上用場
差一點就是萬年肥料,
慘一點就是直接賣掉,放背包都嫌占空間,永遠沒上場機會
而有些低階卡片設計的很漂亮,看得出繪師有下苦心
無奈官方就是把這些卡片設定為低階,註定糞到底
別說路人不想選你的卡片來協助遊戲
很多時候自己也不想派上場QAQ
難道轉蛋遊戲中,低階卡片註定悲劇一輩子嗎?
就連美好世界的和真這種渣職業都可以活躍,看的肥宅我好佩服
所以,有例外的遊戲嗎?!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.45.185.195
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1459256824.A.FE2.html
→
03/29 21:07, , 1F
03/29 21:07, 1F
→
03/29 21:09, , 2F
03/29 21:09, 2F
所以如果有遊戲公司能讓所有卡片都有其戰鬥價值
也就是角色之間作足平衡,不是單純靠傷害數字來決定卡片價值
那就真的滿屌Der
※ 編輯: b9702025 (114.45.185.195), 03/29/2016 21:11:11
→
03/29 21:09, , 3F
03/29 21:09, 3F
→
03/29 21:10, , 4F
03/29 21:10, 4F
推
03/29 21:10, , 5F
03/29 21:10, 5F
→
03/29 21:10, , 6F
03/29 21:10, 6F
→
03/29 21:11, , 7F
03/29 21:11, 7F
推
03/29 21:12, , 8F
03/29 21:12, 8F
→
03/29 21:12, , 9F
03/29 21:12, 9F
→
03/29 21:12, , 10F
03/29 21:12, 10F
→
03/29 21:12, , 11F
03/29 21:12, 11F
→
03/29 21:13, , 12F
03/29 21:13, 12F
→
03/29 21:13, , 13F
03/29 21:13, 13F
推
03/29 21:13, , 14F
03/29 21:13, 14F
推
03/29 21:13, , 15F
03/29 21:13, 15F
※ 編輯: b9702025 (114.45.185.195), 03/29/2016 21:14:13
推
03/29 21:13, , 16F
03/29 21:13, 16F
→
03/29 21:13, , 17F
03/29 21:13, 17F
→
03/29 21:14, , 18F
03/29 21:14, 18F
→
03/29 21:14, , 19F
03/29 21:14, 19F
像這個就是遊戲公司有用心
不是說為了賺錢,一昧製作超強卡片
把低階卡片弄的毫無屁用QAQ
※ 編輯: b9702025 (114.45.185.195), 03/29/2016 21:15:40
→
03/29 21:16, , 20F
03/29 21:16, 20F
推
03/29 21:16, , 21F
03/29 21:16, 21F
→
03/29 21:16, , 22F
03/29 21:16, 22F
→
03/29 21:17, , 23F
03/29 21:17, 23F
推
03/29 21:17, , 24F
03/29 21:17, 24F
→
03/29 21:18, , 25F
03/29 21:18, 25F
推
03/29 21:18, , 26F
03/29 21:18, 26F
推
03/29 21:18, , 27F
03/29 21:18, 27F
推
03/29 21:18, , 28F
03/29 21:18, 28F
推
03/29 21:19, , 29F
03/29 21:19, 29F
→
03/29 21:19, , 30F
03/29 21:19, 30F
推
03/29 21:21, , 31F
03/29 21:21, 31F
推
03/29 21:21, , 32F
03/29 21:21, 32F
→
03/29 21:22, , 33F
03/29 21:22, 33F
推
03/29 21:23, , 34F
03/29 21:23, 34F
推
03/29 21:23, , 35F
03/29 21:23, 35F
→
03/29 21:24, , 36F
03/29 21:24, 36F
還有 30 則推文
推
03/29 22:06, , 67F
03/29 22:06, 67F
→
03/29 22:07, , 68F
03/29 22:07, 68F
推
03/29 22:09, , 69F
03/29 22:09, 69F
→
03/29 22:10, , 70F
03/29 22:10, 70F
推
03/29 22:10, , 71F
03/29 22:10, 71F
→
03/29 22:10, , 72F
03/29 22:10, 72F
推
03/29 22:12, , 73F
03/29 22:12, 73F
推
03/29 22:15, , 74F
03/29 22:15, 74F
→
03/29 22:15, , 75F
03/29 22:15, 75F
推
03/29 22:16, , 76F
03/29 22:16, 76F
推
03/29 22:19, , 77F
03/29 22:19, 77F

→
03/29 22:19, , 78F
03/29 22:19, 78F

→
03/29 22:19, , 79F
03/29 22:19, 79F

→
03/29 22:19, , 80F
03/29 22:19, 80F

→
03/29 22:20, , 81F
03/29 22:20, 81F
推
03/29 22:21, , 82F
03/29 22:21, 82F
→
03/29 22:32, , 83F
03/29 22:32, 83F
推
03/29 22:38, , 84F
03/29 22:38, 84F
→
03/29 22:46, , 85F
03/29 22:46, 85F
推
03/29 22:49, , 86F
03/29 22:49, 86F
推
03/29 22:52, , 87F
03/29 22:52, 87F
→
03/29 22:54, , 88F
03/29 22:54, 88F
→
03/29 22:55, , 89F
03/29 22:55, 89F
推
03/29 22:59, , 90F
03/29 22:59, 90F
→
03/29 22:59, , 91F
03/29 22:59, 91F
推
03/29 23:01, , 92F
03/29 23:01, 92F
推
03/29 23:04, , 93F
03/29 23:04, 93F
推
03/29 23:13, , 94F
03/29 23:13, 94F
推
03/29 23:28, , 95F
03/29 23:28, 95F
推
03/29 23:33, , 96F
03/29 23:33, 96F
推
03/29 23:34, , 97F
03/29 23:34, 97F
推
03/30 01:01, , 98F
03/30 01:01, 98F
→
03/30 01:01, , 99F
03/30 01:01, 99F
推
03/30 03:40, , 100F
03/30 03:40, 100F
推
03/30 09:12, , 101F
03/30 09:12, 101F
推
03/30 11:33, , 102F
03/30 11:33, 102F
→
03/30 11:33, , 103F
03/30 11:33, 103F
推
03/30 13:30, , 104F
03/30 13:30, 104F
→
03/30 13:30, , 105F
03/30 13:30, 105F
→
03/31 01:32, , 106F
03/31 01:32, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 9 篇):