[閒聊] 為什麼法師不騎馬已回收
曹操傳裡面有一隻(全遊戲也就這麼一隻)騎馬策士,司馬懿,
特色就是有著騎兵的高移動力與法師的高破壞力,也比一般的法師耐打。
(題外話就是當年我舅舅在玩的時候還不敢練他,怕叛變)
這讓我想到既然都有弓騎兵,為什麼騎馬的法師這麼少見?
只要能夠熟練騎馬,在各種戰鬥上應該都能夠補足法師較低的機動力,
唯一想到的缺點就是邊騎馬邊念咒語可能會咬到舌頭,
(不過也可以先跑到定點之後放完魔法再跑回來啊)
或者法師都要穿長袍所以不方便騎馬,不過也可以穿改短的或者向惠惠一樣穿披風就好。
而且能夠學魔法的人在各種奇幻設定上都算是有錢人,
有錢的貴族騎個馬應該也是很自然的消遣。
想想看如果甘道夫騎在馬背上大喊:
「You should not pass!!!!!」
不是更加霸氣十足嗎?
--
推
01/05 02:28,
01/05 02:28
推
01/05 02:30,
01/05 02:30
推
01/05 02:33,
01/05 02:33
→
01/05 02:34,
01/05 02:34
推
01/05 02:38,
01/05 02:38
推
01/05 03:19,
01/05 03:19
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.25.105
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1458805507.A.79D.html
推
03/24 15:46, , 1F
03/24 15:46, 1F
推
03/24 15:46, , 2F
03/24 15:46, 2F
→
03/24 15:46, , 3F
03/24 15:46, 3F
對欸,太久沒完都忘了
→
03/24 15:47, , 4F
03/24 15:47, 4F
推
03/24 15:47, , 5F
03/24 15:47, 5F
大師兄,師傅又被抓走了
→
03/24 15:48, , 6F
03/24 15:48, 6F
對阿,所以騎車可能不適合,但騎馬的話如果騎術夠好應該可以一邊騎馬一邊放法
→
03/24 15:48, , 7F
03/24 15:48, 7F
推
03/24 15:48, , 8F
03/24 15:48, 8F
→
03/24 15:48, , 9F
03/24 15:48, 9F
→
03/24 15:48, , 10F
03/24 15:48, 10F
推
03/24 15:48, , 11F
03/24 15:48, 11F
→
03/24 15:48, , 12F
03/24 15:48, 12F
推
03/24 15:49, , 13F
03/24 15:49, 13F
推
03/24 15:50, , 14F
03/24 15:50, 14F
推
03/24 15:51, , 15F
03/24 15:51, 15F
推
03/24 15:51, , 16F
03/24 15:51, 16F
那個好像是騎驢的?
※ 編輯: nahsnib (140.112.25.105), 03/24/2016 15:54:03
→
03/24 15:52, , 17F
03/24 15:52, 17F
推
03/24 15:54, , 18F
03/24 15:54, 18F
推
03/24 15:55, , 19F
03/24 15:55, 19F
→
03/24 15:55, , 20F
03/24 15:55, 20F
推
03/24 15:55, , 21F
03/24 15:55, 21F
→
03/24 15:56, , 22F
03/24 15:56, 22F
是沒錯,不過如果是機車的話比較難分心,騎馬的話馬兒會自己幫你閃障礙物,
而且中古世紀風格的話車子比較少見,不是中古世紀風格的法師比較少見
※ 編輯: nahsnib (140.112.25.105), 03/24/2016 15:58:11
推
03/24 15:57, , 23F
03/24 15:57, 23F
推
03/24 15:57, , 24F
03/24 15:57, 24F
推
03/24 15:58, , 25F
03/24 15:58, 25F
這又是一個刻板印象了;事實上也有很多作品中的法師算是身強體壯,
畢竟健全的心靈寓於健全的身體,體力不好的法師轟完一砲就會躺下來等隊友背他了
推
03/24 15:58, , 26F
03/24 15:58, 26F
→
03/24 15:59, , 27F
03/24 15:59, 27F
※ 編輯: nahsnib (140.112.25.105), 03/24/2016 16:01:14
推
03/24 16:00, , 28F
03/24 16:00, 28F
推
03/24 16:02, , 29F
03/24 16:02, 29F
→
03/24 16:03, , 30F
03/24 16:03, 30F
→
03/24 16:03, , 31F
03/24 16:03, 31F
矩形就是長方形阿,不過這跟黃金矩形有啥關係?
※ 編輯: nahsnib (140.112.25.105), 03/24/2016 16:05:37
推
03/24 16:06, , 32F
03/24 16:06, 32F
推
03/24 16:07, , 33F
03/24 16:07, 33F
→
03/24 16:07, , 34F
03/24 16:07, 34F
推
03/24 16:08, , 35F
03/24 16:08, 35F
推
03/24 16:12, , 36F
03/24 16:12, 36F
→
03/24 16:12, , 37F
03/24 16:12, 37F
→
03/24 16:13, , 38F
03/24 16:13, 38F
怎麼我唸數學系沒聽過這種定義方式(逃)
※ 編輯: nahsnib (140.112.25.105), 03/24/2016 16:15:57
推
03/24 16:14, , 39F
03/24 16:14, 39F
推
03/24 16:15, , 40F
03/24 16:15, 40F
推
03/24 16:15, , 41F
03/24 16:15, 41F
→
03/24 16:16, , 42F
03/24 16:16, 42F
→
03/24 16:16, , 43F
03/24 16:16, 43F
→
03/24 16:19, , 44F
03/24 16:19, 44F
→
03/24 16:24, , 45F
03/24 16:24, 45F
→
03/24 16:27, , 46F
03/24 16:27, 46F
→
03/24 16:27, , 47F
03/24 16:27, 47F
推
03/24 16:29, , 48F
03/24 16:29, 48F
→
03/24 16:29, , 49F
03/24 16:29, 49F
→
03/24 16:29, , 50F
03/24 16:29, 50F
→
03/24 16:33, , 51F
03/24 16:33, 51F
→
03/24 16:35, , 52F
03/24 16:35, 52F
→
03/24 16:35, , 53F
03/24 16:35, 53F
推
03/24 16:41, , 54F
03/24 16:41, 54F
推
03/24 16:46, , 55F
03/24 16:46, 55F
推
03/24 16:51, , 56F
03/24 16:51, 56F
→
03/24 16:56, , 57F
03/24 16:56, 57F
推
03/24 17:19, , 58F
03/24 17:19, 58F
推
03/24 19:06, , 59F
03/24 19:06, 59F
推
03/24 19:55, , 60F
03/24 19:55, 60F
推
03/24 20:25, , 61F
03/24 20:25, 61F
推
03/24 20:58, , 62F
03/24 20:58, 62F
→
03/26 18:14, , 63F
03/26 18:14, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)