[問題] 腰斬漫畫是依甚麼標準來決定的?已回收
近幾年看JUMP,有些漫畫即使已經畫得很鳥了
(EX:繼承篇的家教、傾國篇後的銀魂、以及現在的死神)
但JUMP似乎都會讓他們有個收尾的空間
但看向魔法零蛋、通靈王卻是斬在讓人一頭霧水的地方
(這2部銷量也不會太...糟吧?)
但若是以問卷排行來決定的話...
那我還不懂上述三部怎還會有收尾空間?
(難不成集英社方針又改了?)
再看向小學館,為了啥鳥55周年...
匆匆就給我把兼一收尾了? (差點沒罵出來咧..)
那柯南跟跳針管家怎也不一起來55周年收一收...(怒)
有腰斬漫畫到底是以甚麼來作為評定標準的呢?
--
→ nightmaresea:因為官校的勢力太大無法改革 真正重點在打破官校的近 04/21 23:20
→ magisterMAGI:親相姦 04/21 23:21
→ nightmaresea:親繁殖 美軍軍官會強 很大一部分就靠ROTC打破官校體 04/21 23:21
→ magisterMAGI:位 04/21 23:21
→ nightmaresea:打錯 是近親繁殖不是近親相姦 04/21 23:21
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.121.52.8
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1437323549.A.BBB.html
→
07/20 00:33, , 1F
07/20 00:33, 1F
推
07/20 00:33, , 2F
07/20 00:33, 2F
推
07/20 00:34, , 3F
07/20 00:34, 3F
原本是想打傾國篇後,感謝提醒
推
07/20 00:34, , 4F
07/20 00:34, 4F
兼一不是才妙手,還沒出師吧?
→
07/20 00:34, , 5F
07/20 00:34, 5F
推
07/20 00:34, , 6F
07/20 00:34, 6F
柯南漫畫不是電影人物設定集嗎?
推
07/20 00:34, , 7F
07/20 00:34, 7F
※ 編輯: yyes5210 (122.121.52.8), 07/20/2015 00:37:43
→
07/20 00:34, , 8F
07/20 00:34, 8F
→
07/20 00:35, , 9F
07/20 00:35, 9F
→
07/20 00:36, , 10F
07/20 00:36, 10F
幸好我幽游先追動畫,要是先看到漫畫應該會氣死..
推
07/20 00:36, , 11F
07/20 00:36, 11F
→
07/20 00:37, , 12F
07/20 00:37, 12F
可是我覺得兼一也不差啊...
→
07/20 00:37, , 13F
07/20 00:37, 13F
推
07/20 00:38, , 14F
07/20 00:38, 14F
→
07/20 00:38, , 15F
07/20 00:38, 15F
(話說,有人有調查過烏龍派出所的銷量嗎?)
→
07/20 00:38, , 16F
07/20 00:38, 16F
推
07/20 00:38, , 17F
07/20 00:38, 17F
推
07/20 00:39, , 18F
07/20 00:39, 18F
推
07/20 00:39, , 19F
07/20 00:39, 19F
求八卦
推
07/20 00:39, , 20F
07/20 00:39, 20F
即使他可能真的不想畫了...
→
07/20 00:39, , 21F
07/20 00:39, 21F
→
07/20 00:40, , 22F
07/20 00:40, 22F
→
07/20 00:40, , 23F
07/20 00:40, 23F
恩...
→
07/20 00:41, , 24F
07/20 00:41, 24F
那其他出版社是以...?銷量?
推
07/20 00:42, , 25F
07/20 00:42, 25F
※ 編輯: yyes5210 (122.121.52.8), 07/20/2015 00:48:25
推
07/20 00:43, , 26F
07/20 00:43, 26F
推
07/20 00:43, , 27F
07/20 00:43, 27F
→
07/20 00:43, , 28F
07/20 00:43, 28F
→
07/20 00:44, , 29F
07/20 00:44, 29F
→
07/20 00:45, , 30F
07/20 00:45, 30F
推
07/20 00:45, , 31F
07/20 00:45, 31F
推
07/20 00:46, , 32F
07/20 00:46, 32F
→
07/20 00:46, , 33F
07/20 00:46, 33F
推
07/20 00:46, , 34F
07/20 00:46, 34F
推
07/20 00:46, , 35F
07/20 00:46, 35F
推
07/20 00:47, , 36F
07/20 00:47, 36F
推
07/20 00:48, , 37F
07/20 00:48, 37F
→
07/20 00:48, , 38F
07/20 00:48, 38F
推
07/20 00:48, , 39F
07/20 00:48, 39F
推
07/20 00:51, , 40F
07/20 00:51, 40F
推
07/20 00:52, , 41F
07/20 00:52, 41F
推
07/20 00:52, , 42F
07/20 00:52, 42F
推
07/20 00:54, , 43F
07/20 00:54, 43F
→
07/20 00:54, , 44F
07/20 00:54, 44F
推
07/20 00:54, , 45F
07/20 00:54, 45F
→
07/20 00:55, , 46F
07/20 00:55, 46F
推
07/20 00:57, , 47F
07/20 00:57, 47F
→
07/20 01:00, , 48F
07/20 01:00, 48F
推
07/20 01:05, , 49F
07/20 01:05, 49F
→
07/20 01:25, , 50F
07/20 01:25, 50F
推
07/20 01:26, , 51F
07/20 01:26, 51F
推
07/20 01:28, , 52F
07/20 01:28, 52F
推
07/20 01:29, , 53F
07/20 01:29, 53F
→
07/20 01:29, , 54F
07/20 01:29, 54F
→
07/20 01:50, , 55F
07/20 01:50, 55F
推
07/20 01:52, , 56F
07/20 01:52, 56F
推
07/20 01:55, , 57F
07/20 01:55, 57F
→
07/20 09:20, , 58F
07/20 09:20, 58F
→
07/20 09:23, , 59F
07/20 09:23, 59F
→
07/20 09:24, , 60F
07/20 09:24, 60F
推
07/20 12:20, , 61F
07/20 12:20, 61F
推
07/20 18:27, , 62F
07/20 18:27, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):