[討論] TM世界的魔術師會不會近親繁殖?消失
剛看到討論劣等生的文章
劣等生世界觀也是很注重血統的
為了培育出好的魔法師不擇手段
而型月也是這樣
優良的魔術師通常擁有久遠的家族與好的魔術刻印
魔術師家系會互相通婚交流
產生天份極佳的魔術師後代
像遠坂凜就是一個例子
那會不會有原本就很強大的魔術師家族為了產生好的後代
故意生下一對非常具有天份的兄妹
讓他們結合產下更強的子嗣?
還是這樣子沒用?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my HUAWEI G700-U10.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.230.54.235
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1431157526.A.680.html
推
05/09 15:46, , 1F
05/09 15:46, 1F
→
05/09 15:48, , 2F
05/09 15:48, 2F
→
05/09 15:48, , 3F
05/09 15:48, 3F
→
05/09 15:48, , 4F
05/09 15:48, 4F
→
05/09 15:48, , 5F
05/09 15:48, 5F
推
05/09 15:50, , 6F
05/09 15:50, 6F
→
05/09 15:50, , 7F
05/09 15:50, 7F
→
05/09 15:50, , 8F
05/09 15:50, 8F
→
05/09 15:51, , 9F
05/09 15:51, 9F
推
05/09 15:52, , 10F
05/09 15:52, 10F
推
05/09 15:52, , 11F
05/09 15:52, 11F
→
05/09 15:53, , 12F
05/09 15:53, 12F
→
05/09 15:58, , 13F
05/09 15:58, 13F
推
05/09 15:58, , 14F
05/09 15:58, 14F
→
05/09 15:59, , 15F
05/09 15:59, 15F
→
05/09 16:01, , 16F
05/09 16:01, 16F
推
05/09 16:01, , 17F
05/09 16:01, 17F
→
05/09 16:01, , 18F
05/09 16:01, 18F
→
05/09 16:01, , 19F
05/09 16:01, 19F
→
05/09 16:02, , 20F
05/09 16:02, 20F
推
05/09 16:04, , 21F
05/09 16:04, 21F
→
05/09 16:04, , 22F
05/09 16:04, 22F
→
05/09 16:04, , 23F
05/09 16:04, 23F
→
05/09 16:04, , 24F
05/09 16:04, 24F
→
05/09 16:04, , 25F
05/09 16:04, 25F
→
05/09 16:05, , 26F
05/09 16:05, 26F
→
05/09 16:06, , 27F
05/09 16:06, 27F
→
05/09 16:06, , 28F
05/09 16:06, 28F
→
05/09 16:06, , 29F
05/09 16:06, 29F
推
05/09 16:06, , 30F
05/09 16:06, 30F
推
05/09 16:06, , 31F
05/09 16:06, 31F
→
05/09 16:07, , 32F
05/09 16:07, 32F
→
05/09 16:07, , 33F
05/09 16:07, 33F
→
05/09 16:07, , 34F
05/09 16:07, 34F
推
05/09 16:08, , 35F
05/09 16:08, 35F
→
05/09 16:10, , 36F
05/09 16:10, 36F
→
05/09 16:10, , 37F
05/09 16:10, 37F
→
05/09 16:11, , 38F
05/09 16:11, 38F
推
05/09 16:12, , 39F
05/09 16:12, 39F
推
05/09 16:12, , 40F
05/09 16:12, 40F
→
05/09 16:13, , 41F
05/09 16:13, 41F
→
05/09 16:13, , 42F
05/09 16:13, 42F
→
05/09 16:13, , 43F
05/09 16:13, 43F
→
05/09 16:13, , 44F
05/09 16:13, 44F
→
05/09 16:13, , 45F
05/09 16:13, 45F
推
05/09 16:15, , 46F
05/09 16:15, 46F
→
05/09 16:15, , 47F
05/09 16:15, 47F
→
05/09 16:16, , 48F
05/09 16:16, 48F
→
05/09 16:16, , 49F
05/09 16:16, 49F
→
05/09 16:16, , 50F
05/09 16:16, 50F
→
05/09 16:17, , 51F
05/09 16:17, 51F
→
05/09 16:17, , 52F
05/09 16:17, 52F
推
05/09 16:18, , 53F
05/09 16:18, 53F
→
05/09 16:20, , 54F
05/09 16:20, 54F
→
05/09 16:23, , 55F
05/09 16:23, 55F
→
05/09 16:24, , 56F
05/09 16:24, 56F
推
05/09 16:26, , 57F
05/09 16:26, 57F
推
05/09 16:28, , 58F
05/09 16:28, 58F
推
05/09 16:46, , 59F
05/09 16:46, 59F
推
05/09 17:31, , 60F
05/09 17:31, 60F
推
05/10 01:30, , 61F
05/10 01:30, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):