[外電] 來自NYDailynews的部落格
看板CMWang作者yyhong68 (come every now and then)時間15年前 (2009/06/03 12:00)推噓13(13推 0噓 14→)留言27則, 17人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
今天主跑的Mark休假，所以Anthony McCarron 代班
以下是Anthony McCarron 提到有關王的部份：
The Yanks discussed what we'll call “The Chien-Ming Wang Situation” and
are “on schedule” rotation-wise, Girardi said. Skipper quote: “We had
discussions and at this point, nothing has changed. Our guys are still on
schedule. We're happy with the progress that he's made, but at this point
we're staying on schedule.
“We haven't made any changes up until this point. We're staying on schedule
and we'll continue to evaluate it every day.”
A humble opinion, if I may, faithful readers: What does CMW have to do to
get back in the rotation? Wasn't everybody saying that he was back to his
old self in his last effort - three scoreless innings in Cleveland Sunday?
If that is the case, what else does a two-time 19-game winner have to show
to get his job back?
I think Phil Hughes is going to be a big-time pitcher, a rotation mainstay
for years to come. But Wang already is that.
I know Wang was awful at the start of the season. Dreadful, terrible.
But the Yankees need to know if he's back. Mop-up duty out of the pen is
not going to let them know that. Give him back his job.
- by Anthony McCarron
http://tinyurl.com/pnmc8z
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.109.23.38
推
06/03 12:05, , 1F
06/03 12:05, 1F
推
06/03 12:05, , 2F
06/03 12:05, 2F
→
06/03 12:06, , 3F
06/03 12:06, 3F
→
06/03 12:06, , 4F
06/03 12:06, 4F
→
06/03 12:07, , 5F
06/03 12:07, 5F
推
06/03 12:09, , 6F
06/03 12:09, 6F
推
06/03 12:10, , 7F
06/03 12:10, 7F
→
06/03 12:10, , 8F
06/03 12:10, 8F
推
06/03 12:11, , 9F
06/03 12:11, 9F
推
06/03 12:12, , 10F
06/03 12:12, 10F
推
06/03 12:27, , 11F
06/03 12:27, 11F
推
06/03 12:31, , 12F
06/03 12:31, 12F
推
06/03 12:32, , 13F
06/03 12:32, 13F
推
06/03 12:34, , 14F
06/03 12:34, 14F
推
06/03 12:34, , 15F
06/03 12:34, 15F
→
06/03 12:46, , 16F
06/03 12:46, 16F
推
06/03 12:54, , 17F
06/03 12:54, 17F
→
06/03 12:56, , 18F
06/03 12:56, 18F
→
06/03 12:57, , 19F
06/03 12:57, 19F
→
06/03 13:08, , 20F
06/03 13:08, 20F
→
06/03 13:12, , 21F
06/03 13:12, 21F
→
06/03 13:19, , 22F
06/03 13:19, 22F
→
06/03 13:20, , 23F
06/03 13:20, 23F
→
06/03 13:23, , 24F
06/03 13:23, 24F
→
06/03 13:23, , 25F
06/03 13:23, 25F
推
06/03 14:32, , 26F
06/03 14:32, 26F
→
06/03 14:33, , 27F
06/03 14:33, 27F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先)：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇)：