[討論] 請問有比0050還優秀的產品?消失
麻煩大家幫我解惑,以我淺薄的金融知識上網搜尋google得到一些0050的優點?
用途:資金大約3000萬,想保本留被動收入給下一代,資金投入後,不停損,現金股息再投
入。
優點1:不會倒(壓寶台灣),香港被大陸吃掉後狂漲
優點2:與國外etf相比,殖利率偏高
優點3:與國外etf相比,遺產稅門檻相對 高,稅率相對低,下一代處理方便
優點4:與國內其他定存股相比,有綜合所得稅的賦稅優勢(有些配息算價差所得),雖然
扣抵率及殖利率相對低,但是不會倒
想請問大家有更好的投資工具嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.8.224.49
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/CFP/M.1505020831.A.0E3.html
推
09/10 14:18, , 1F
09/10 14:18, 1F
→
09/10 14:27, , 2F
09/10 14:27, 2F
→
09/10 14:29, , 3F
09/10 14:29, 3F
推
09/10 14:35, , 4F
09/10 14:35, 4F
推
09/10 14:53, , 5F
09/10 14:53, 5F
→
09/10 14:55, , 6F
09/10 14:55, 6F
→
09/10 14:55, , 7F
09/10 14:55, 7F
推
09/10 15:01, , 8F
09/10 15:01, 8F
→
09/10 15:05, , 9F
09/10 15:05, 9F
推
09/10 15:56, , 10F
09/10 15:56, 10F
推
09/10 15:59, , 11F
09/10 15:59, 11F
→
09/10 16:00, , 12F
09/10 16:00, 12F
→
09/10 16:06, , 13F
09/10 16:06, 13F
→
09/10 16:08, , 14F
09/10 16:08, 14F
推
09/10 16:09, , 15F
09/10 16:09, 15F
→
09/10 16:10, , 16F
09/10 16:10, 16F
→
09/10 16:11, , 17F
09/10 16:11, 17F
推
09/10 16:25, , 18F
09/10 16:25, 18F
推
09/10 16:27, , 19F
09/10 16:27, 19F
→
09/10 16:45, , 20F
09/10 16:45, 20F
→
09/10 16:45, , 21F
09/10 16:45, 21F
→
09/10 16:45, , 22F
09/10 16:45, 22F
→
09/10 16:54, , 23F
09/10 16:54, 23F
→
09/10 16:54, , 24F
09/10 16:54, 24F
推
09/10 18:29, , 25F
09/10 18:29, 25F
→
09/10 18:30, , 26F
09/10 18:30, 26F
→
09/10 18:31, , 27F
09/10 18:31, 27F
→
09/10 18:34, , 28F
09/10 18:34, 28F
→
09/10 18:52, , 29F
09/10 18:52, 29F
→
09/10 18:57, , 30F
09/10 18:57, 30F
→
09/10 18:57, , 31F
09/10 18:57, 31F
推
09/10 19:32, , 32F
09/10 19:32, 32F
→
09/10 19:32, , 33F
09/10 19:32, 33F
推
09/10 19:52, , 34F
09/10 19:52, 34F
→
09/10 20:53, , 35F
09/10 20:53, 35F
→
09/10 20:57, , 36F
09/10 20:57, 36F
→
09/10 20:57, , 37F
09/10 20:57, 37F
→
09/10 20:57, , 38F
09/10 20:57, 38F
推
09/10 21:17, , 39F
09/10 21:17, 39F
→
09/10 21:17, , 40F
09/10 21:17, 40F
→
09/10 21:25, , 41F
09/10 21:25, 41F
→
09/10 21:25, , 42F
09/10 21:25, 42F
推
09/10 21:39, , 43F
09/10 21:39, 43F
推
09/10 21:42, , 44F
09/10 21:42, 44F
→
09/10 21:44, , 45F
09/10 21:44, 45F
→
09/10 21:52, , 46F
09/10 21:52, 46F
→
09/10 21:53, , 47F
09/10 21:53, 47F
→
09/10 21:54, , 48F
09/10 21:54, 48F
→
09/10 21:54, , 49F
09/10 21:54, 49F
→
09/10 21:55, , 50F
09/10 21:55, 50F
→
09/10 21:56, , 51F
09/10 21:56, 51F
推
09/10 22:21, , 52F
09/10 22:21, 52F
→
09/10 22:22, , 53F
09/10 22:22, 53F
→
09/10 22:23, , 54F
09/10 22:23, 54F
→
09/10 23:36, , 55F
09/10 23:36, 55F
→
09/10 23:37, , 56F
09/10 23:37, 56F
推
09/10 23:37, , 57F
09/10 23:37, 57F
推
09/11 00:36, , 58F
09/11 00:36, 58F
推
09/11 08:36, , 59F
09/11 08:36, 59F
推
09/11 09:04, , 60F
09/11 09:04, 60F
→
09/12 06:59, , 61F
09/12 06:59, 61F
推
09/12 17:25, , 62F
09/12 17:25, 62F
→
09/12 17:25, , 63F
09/12 17:25, 63F
推
09/12 17:54, , 64F
09/12 17:54, 64F
推
09/12 18:28, , 65F
09/12 18:28, 65F
推
09/12 23:53, , 66F
09/12 23:53, 66F
→
09/12 23:53, , 67F
09/12 23:53, 67F
推
09/12 23:56, , 68F
09/12 23:56, 68F
推
09/13 09:24, , 69F
09/13 09:24, 69F
推
09/13 23:30, , 70F
09/13 23:30, 70F
推
09/17 01:49, , 71F
09/17 01:49, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):