[閒聊] 王建民當年在洋基到底算不算一號???
看板Baseball作者Kaneshiro5 (☆碇真嗣の電子學☆)時間6年前 (2017/09/23 14:22)推噓63(76推 13噓 82→)留言171則, 99人參與討論串1/11 (看更多)
十餘年前王葛格上大聯盟 本肥才國小
記憶中當年和朋友原先是關注狂曹在落磯的終結者之爭
後來小曹贏了一個左投 但投沒多久肩膀爆炸 反被那位左投取代
爾後漸漸發現家中水果報的體育版常出現王葛格 06年才開始正式關注他
風光2年甚至到08年開季超強勢的表現所掀起的風潮更多老前輩比我清楚 不多贅述
台媒的宣傳加上豪門洋基的加持 使得那段日子的洋基隊如同台灣隊
但近日和朋友聚會聊到這段 則聽到不同的見解
他們認為王葛格勝投時美媒還是把焦點放在其他明星球員
ex.a肉打的如何,j特表現的好不好...等等
即便帳面成績老王最出色 但球團對他的態度也不是1號
反倒更重視RJ 穆帥 老佩等人~
由於當年年紀甚小 資訊的接收來源多是國內媒體
不清楚外國媒體亦或更全面的評價
想請問當年 王建民在洋基有被當成1號先發看待嗎???
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.205.14.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1506147763.A.C63.html
推
09/23 14:23, , 1F
09/23 14:23, 1F
→
09/23 14:24, , 2F
09/23 14:24, 2F
→
09/23 14:24, , 3F
09/23 14:24, 3F
→
09/23 14:24, , 4F
09/23 14:24, 4F
推
09/23 14:24, , 5F
09/23 14:24, 5F
推
09/23 14:24, , 6F
09/23 14:24, 6F
推
09/23 14:24, , 7F
09/23 14:24, 7F
推
09/23 14:24, , 8F
09/23 14:24, 8F
→
09/23 14:25, , 9F
09/23 14:25, 9F
→
09/23 14:25, , 10F
09/23 14:25, 10F
→
09/23 14:25, , 11F
09/23 14:25, 11F
推
09/23 14:26, , 12F
09/23 14:26, 12F
→
09/23 14:26, , 13F
09/23 14:26, 13F
→
09/23 14:26, , 14F
09/23 14:26, 14F
→
09/23 14:26, , 15F
09/23 14:26, 15F
噓
09/23 14:26, , 16F
09/23 14:26, 16F
→
09/23 14:26, , 17F
09/23 14:26, 17F
推
09/23 14:27, , 18F
09/23 14:27, 18F
推
09/23 14:28, , 19F
09/23 14:28, 19F
→
09/23 14:28, , 20F
09/23 14:28, 20F
推
09/23 14:28, , 21F
09/23 14:28, 21F
推
09/23 14:28, , 22F
09/23 14:28, 22F
→
09/23 14:29, , 23F
09/23 14:29, 23F
→
09/23 14:29, , 24F
09/23 14:29, 24F
推
09/23 14:29, , 25F
09/23 14:29, 25F
→
09/23 14:29, , 26F
09/23 14:29, 26F
→
09/23 14:30, , 27F
09/23 14:30, 27F
→
09/23 14:30, , 28F
09/23 14:30, 28F
→
09/23 14:30, , 29F
09/23 14:30, 29F
推
09/23 14:30, , 30F
09/23 14:30, 30F
→
09/23 14:30, , 31F
09/23 14:30, 31F
→
09/23 14:31, , 32F
09/23 14:31, 32F
推
09/23 14:31, , 33F
09/23 14:31, 33F
→
09/23 14:31, , 34F
09/23 14:31, 34F
推
09/23 14:31, , 35F
09/23 14:31, 35F
→
09/23 14:31, , 36F
09/23 14:31, 36F
→
09/23 14:32, , 37F
09/23 14:32, 37F
→
09/23 14:32, , 38F
09/23 14:32, 38F
推
09/23 14:32, , 39F
09/23 14:32, 39F
還有 92 則推文
推
09/23 16:10, , 132F
09/23 16:10, 132F
推
09/23 16:21, , 133F
09/23 16:21, 133F
推
09/23 16:31, , 134F
09/23 16:31, 134F
推
09/23 16:38, , 135F
09/23 16:38, 135F
→
09/23 16:38, , 136F
09/23 16:38, 136F
推
09/23 16:44, , 137F
09/23 16:44, 137F
推
09/23 16:49, , 138F
09/23 16:49, 138F
→
09/23 16:52, , 139F
09/23 16:52, 139F
推
09/23 16:57, , 140F
09/23 16:57, 140F
→
09/23 16:58, , 141F
09/23 16:58, 141F
推
09/23 17:15, , 142F
09/23 17:15, 142F
噓
09/23 17:54, , 143F
09/23 17:54, 143F
推
09/23 17:58, , 144F
09/23 17:58, 144F
推
09/23 17:58, , 145F
09/23 17:58, 145F
→
09/23 17:58, , 146F
09/23 17:58, 146F
→
09/23 17:59, , 147F
09/23 17:59, 147F
噓
09/23 18:07, , 148F
09/23 18:07, 148F
推
09/23 18:10, , 149F
09/23 18:10, 149F
推
09/23 18:11, , 150F
09/23 18:11, 150F
→
09/23 18:22, , 151F
09/23 18:22, 151F
→
09/23 18:26, , 152F
09/23 18:26, 152F
推
09/23 18:31, , 153F
09/23 18:31, 153F
推
09/23 18:54, , 154F
09/23 18:54, 154F
推
09/23 18:56, , 155F
09/23 18:56, 155F
→
09/23 19:01, , 156F
09/23 19:01, 156F
→
09/23 19:02, , 157F
09/23 19:02, 157F
→
09/23 19:31, , 158F
09/23 19:31, 158F
→
09/23 19:31, , 159F
09/23 19:31, 159F
推
09/23 19:52, , 160F
09/23 19:52, 160F
推
09/23 20:06, , 161F
09/23 20:06, 161F
→
09/23 20:06, , 162F
09/23 20:06, 162F
→
09/23 20:07, , 163F
09/23 20:07, 163F
→
09/23 20:10, , 164F
09/23 20:10, 164F
→
09/23 20:12, , 165F
09/23 20:12, 165F
推
09/23 20:42, , 166F
09/23 20:42, 166F
噓
09/23 21:37, , 167F
09/23 21:37, 167F
推
09/23 22:05, , 168F
09/23 22:05, 168F
噓
09/24 02:53, , 169F
09/24 02:53, 169F
推
09/24 08:28, , 170F
09/24 08:28, 170F
推
09/24 15:18, , 171F
09/24 15:18, 171F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 11 篇):