Re: [問題] 美式訓練球員是不是過太爽
原文43
前天有去政問有幸聽到很多很好的內容
其中有人發問說關於外籍教練來台灣胡理事長的看法
胡理事長說:這是治標不治本的方法,因為外籍教練不太可能長期在台執教,
必須還是著重本土教練的養成、進修等等。
有個滿有趣的事情是,
舉了陳子豪當例子,
他說像陳子豪這麼年輕的選手,
外國教練一來一下子塞了太多東西讓他無法吸收
這其實對選手也不太好。
我不清楚這是子豪反應給球員工會的意見還是理事長自己揣摩的。
提供給大家參考而已。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.176.118.155
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1493788641.A.DFD.html
推
05/03 13:19, , 1F
05/03 13:19, 1F
→
05/03 13:19, , 2F
05/03 13:19, 2F
推
05/03 13:21, , 3F
05/03 13:21, 3F
推
05/03 13:26, , 4F
05/03 13:26, 4F
→
05/03 13:26, , 5F
05/03 13:26, 5F
推
05/03 13:28, , 6F
05/03 13:28, 6F
→
05/03 13:28, , 7F
05/03 13:28, 7F
推
05/03 13:28, , 8F
05/03 13:28, 8F
→
05/03 13:28, , 9F
05/03 13:28, 9F
→
05/03 13:28, , 10F
05/03 13:28, 10F
→
05/03 13:29, , 11F
05/03 13:29, 11F
→
05/03 13:29, , 12F
05/03 13:29, 12F
→
05/03 13:29, , 13F
05/03 13:29, 13F
→
05/03 13:30, , 14F
05/03 13:30, 14F
→
05/03 13:30, , 15F
05/03 13:30, 15F
→
05/03 13:30, , 16F
05/03 13:30, 16F
推
05/03 13:32, , 17F
05/03 13:32, 17F
推
05/03 13:32, , 18F
05/03 13:32, 18F
推
05/03 13:32, , 19F
05/03 13:32, 19F
→
05/03 13:32, , 20F
05/03 13:32, 20F
→
05/03 13:32, , 21F
05/03 13:32, 21F
→
05/03 13:33, , 22F
05/03 13:33, 22F
推
05/03 13:36, , 23F
05/03 13:36, 23F
→
05/03 13:37, , 24F
05/03 13:37, 24F
推
05/03 13:41, , 25F
05/03 13:41, 25F
推
05/03 13:44, , 26F
05/03 13:44, 26F
推
05/03 13:45, , 27F
05/03 13:45, 27F
→
05/03 13:46, , 28F
05/03 13:46, 28F
→
05/03 13:47, , 29F
05/03 13:47, 29F
推
05/03 13:48, , 30F
05/03 13:48, 30F
推
05/03 13:50, , 31F
05/03 13:50, 31F
推
05/03 13:56, , 32F
05/03 13:56, 32F
→
05/03 13:58, , 33F
05/03 13:58, 33F
→
05/03 13:59, , 34F
05/03 13:59, 34F
推
05/03 13:59, , 35F
05/03 13:59, 35F

→
05/03 13:59, , 36F
05/03 13:59, 36F
推
05/03 14:03, , 37F
05/03 14:03, 37F
所以胡金龍是鼓勵台灣教練出去進修、
希望政府能補助台灣的球員退休之後去進修
他還舉了葉總當例子,畢竟葉總是自費出國進修的。
※ 編輯: spermjapan (180.176.118.155), 05/03/2017 14:05:25
推
05/03 14:11, , 38F
05/03 14:11, 38F
推
05/03 14:12, , 39F
05/03 14:12, 39F
→
05/03 14:12, , 40F
05/03 14:12, 40F
推
05/03 14:22, , 41F
05/03 14:22, 41F
→
05/03 14:34, , 42F
05/03 14:34, 42F
→
05/03 14:42, , 43F
05/03 14:42, 43F
→
05/03 14:42, , 44F
05/03 14:42, 44F
→
05/03 14:43, , 45F
05/03 14:43, 45F
噓
05/03 14:44, , 46F
05/03 14:44, 46F
→
05/03 14:44, , 47F
05/03 14:44, 47F
推
05/03 14:46, , 48F
05/03 14:46, 48F
→
05/03 14:52, , 49F
05/03 14:52, 49F
→
05/03 14:52, , 50F
05/03 14:52, 50F
→
05/03 14:52, , 51F
05/03 14:52, 51F
推
05/03 14:53, , 52F
05/03 14:53, 52F
→
05/03 14:53, , 53F
05/03 14:53, 53F
推
05/03 14:55, , 54F
05/03 14:55, 54F
→
05/03 15:09, , 55F
05/03 15:09, 55F
→
05/03 15:09, , 56F
05/03 15:09, 56F
→
05/03 15:10, , 57F
05/03 15:10, 57F
→
05/03 15:10, , 58F
05/03 15:10, 58F
推
05/03 15:12, , 59F
05/03 15:12, 59F
推
05/03 15:12, , 60F
05/03 15:12, 60F
推
05/03 15:14, , 61F
05/03 15:14, 61F
推
05/03 15:16, , 62F
05/03 15:16, 62F
推
05/03 15:18, , 63F
05/03 15:18, 63F
→
05/03 15:18, , 64F
05/03 15:18, 64F
→
05/03 15:18, , 65F
05/03 15:18, 65F
推
05/03 15:41, , 66F
05/03 15:41, 66F
→
05/03 15:41, , 67F
05/03 15:41, 67F
推
05/03 16:14, , 68F
05/03 16:14, 68F
噓
05/03 16:15, , 69F
05/03 16:15, 69F
→
05/03 16:16, , 70F
05/03 16:16, 70F
推
05/03 18:39, , 71F
05/03 18:39, 71F
→
12/09 20:49,
7年前
, 72F
12/09 20:49, 72F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
問題
-7
37