Re: [討論] 有鄉民支持兄弟球員鬥教練的嗎已回收
原文恕刪......
竟然才打了兩場就開始鬥,那我們就好好來檢視這兩場史總的調度
投手:兩場先發投手都沒有吃掉長局數,接替上來的左鄭&奶茶從用球數來看
是當長中繼使用,這跟之前史總提到這兩人是可能先發人選並無衝突
其他RP就不用說了,陳鴻文被當敗處?中信一直到明天才有比賽,小飛刀
的狀況上來調整根本完全沒問題~
捕手:兩場兩個,有輪休也看似有解決鄉民擔心達鬨上季過操的問題
打線:比較大的變動就是子豪成為固定先發RF,中信幾個主力OF去年OPS+如下:
周董:130.7 張志豪:126.5 陳子豪:125.8 花花:97.9
誰要去板凳不夠簡單明瞭嗎?好 如果論守備 周董那種守備失憶狀態
恐怕只能去卡DH了吧!?卡DH的 基宏 恰恰 周董 這三人誰上場都沒爭議
基宏OPS+148.5 恰恰109.2 看起來恰恰應該板凳,但恰恰是特殊的存在
球隊看板在能打的狀態下,給他多上場也沒啥問題
另外,史總上一場明知道+G沒把球接好還故意上去拐氣拖時間給牛棚熱身
這點不知道有沒有人注意到?總結各點 史總幾乎沒有犯錯還做得很棒
宣稱要被消滅的楊領隊,為啥會被叫為楊神?就是他幾乎有求必應啊!
球員大幅加薪不說,認養主場,球團蓋春訓場地,各種行銷活動
讓爪迷有本錢整天跟人戰來戰去,能做的幾乎都做了,結果現在又傳這種新聞
這大概也是為啥現有資訊下,風向全部往羊(洋?)肉爐這邊倒的關係吧~~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.46.89
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1490671666.A.2B5.html
推
03/28 11:29, , 1F
03/28 11:29, 1F
→
03/28 11:29, , 2F
03/28 11:29, 2F
→
03/28 11:30, , 3F
03/28 11:30, 3F
推
03/28 11:30, , 4F
03/28 11:30, 4F
推
03/28 11:30, , 5F
03/28 11:30, 5F
推
03/28 11:30, , 6F
03/28 11:30, 6F
→
03/28 11:30, , 7F
03/28 11:30, 7F
推
03/28 11:30, , 8F
03/28 11:30, 8F
→
03/28 11:30, , 9F
03/28 11:30, 9F
推
03/28 11:32, , 10F
03/28 11:32, 10F
推
03/28 11:32, , 11F
03/28 11:32, 11F
推
03/28 11:34, , 12F
03/28 11:34, 12F
推
03/28 11:34, , 13F
03/28 11:34, 13F
→
03/28 11:34, , 14F
03/28 11:34, 14F
推
03/28 11:34, , 15F
03/28 11:34, 15F
推
03/28 11:34, , 16F
03/28 11:34, 16F
推
03/28 11:35, , 17F
03/28 11:35, 17F
→
03/28 11:36, , 18F
03/28 11:36, 18F
推
03/28 11:36, , 19F
03/28 11:36, 19F
推
03/28 11:36, , 20F
03/28 11:36, 20F
→
03/28 11:36, , 21F
03/28 11:36, 21F
→
03/28 11:37, , 22F
03/28 11:37, 22F
推
03/28 11:37, , 23F
03/28 11:37, 23F
→
03/28 11:38, , 24F
03/28 11:38, 24F
→
03/28 11:38, , 25F
03/28 11:38, 25F
推
03/28 11:38, , 26F
03/28 11:38, 26F
→
03/28 11:38, , 27F
03/28 11:38, 27F
→
03/28 11:38, , 28F
03/28 11:38, 28F
→
03/28 11:39, , 29F
03/28 11:39, 29F
→
03/28 11:39, , 30F
03/28 11:39, 30F
→
03/28 11:40, , 31F
03/28 11:40, 31F
→
03/28 11:41, , 32F
03/28 11:41, 32F
推
03/28 11:41, , 33F
03/28 11:41, 33F
推
03/28 11:42, , 34F
03/28 11:42, 34F
推
03/28 11:42, , 35F
03/28 11:42, 35F
→
03/28 11:43, , 36F
03/28 11:43, 36F
推
03/28 11:43, , 37F
03/28 11:43, 37F
→
03/28 11:43, , 38F
03/28 11:43, 38F
推
03/28 11:44, , 39F
03/28 11:44, 39F
推
03/28 11:44, , 40F
03/28 11:44, 40F
推
03/28 11:44, , 41F
03/28 11:44, 41F
→
03/28 11:45, , 42F
03/28 11:45, 42F
推
03/28 11:46, , 43F
03/28 11:46, 43F
→
03/28 11:46, , 44F
03/28 11:46, 44F
推
03/28 11:47, , 45F
03/28 11:47, 45F
推
03/28 11:48, , 46F
03/28 11:48, 46F
→
03/28 11:48, , 47F
03/28 11:48, 47F
推
03/28 11:48, , 48F
03/28 11:48, 48F
推
03/28 11:49, , 49F
03/28 11:49, 49F
推
03/28 11:49, , 50F
03/28 11:49, 50F
→
03/28 11:49, , 51F
03/28 11:49, 51F
→
03/28 11:50, , 52F
03/28 11:50, 52F
→
03/28 11:51, , 53F
03/28 11:51, 53F
→
03/28 11:51, , 54F
03/28 11:51, 54F
推
03/28 11:51, , 55F
03/28 11:51, 55F
→
03/28 11:52, , 56F
03/28 11:52, 56F
→
03/28 12:06, , 57F
03/28 12:06, 57F
推
03/28 12:07, , 58F
03/28 12:07, 58F
推
03/28 12:08, , 59F
03/28 12:08, 59F
推
03/28 12:22, , 60F
03/28 12:22, 60F
推
03/28 12:33, , 61F
03/28 12:33, 61F
推
03/28 13:07, , 62F
03/28 13:07, 62F
推
03/28 13:14, , 63F
03/28 13:14, 63F
推
03/28 13:34, , 64F
03/28 13:34, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 5 篇):