[閒聊] 平心而論 這次三敗不是在預料之內嗎?已回收
在A組中 中華隊實力本來就是最弱
以色列基本上就是美國2A 3A組成的 跟一些過氣的大聯盟選手
荷蘭現役大聯盟也有4位 而且不乏球隊主力 其它選手實力也堅強
韓國雖然徵召也不順 至少韓國職棒明星也全員到齊 現役大聯盟實力的也有兩位
(吳昇桓頂級救援 李大浩去年在水手0.253 0.312 0.428完整球季表現)
台灣隊 除了本來職棒基數就少 也少了A級戰力的Lamigo一些重炮手
旅美最高層級的就一個美國1A的江少慶
剩下的都日職二軍咖
開打前 其實大家也做好心理準備要被虐了
很多人也說0勝3敗不意外 只祈禱不要被call game就好
甚至各大運動網站 也沒人看好過中華隊能有甚麼好表現
但是對以色列 以色列對韓荷都封鎖 台灣對以色列卻打下荷蘭+韓國 兩倍以上的分數
對荷蘭 有來有往 也讓他們嚇出一身冷汗
對韓國 要不是最後有大聯盟頂級的吳昇桓 否則可能九下可能就跟韓國說再見了
其實整體看
中華隊表現得比預期好太多
那麼為什麼大家還是那麼生氣呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.142.139.131
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489110579.A.38C.html
→
03/10 09:50, , 1F
03/10 09:50, 1F
推
03/10 09:50, , 2F
03/10 09:50, 2F
推
03/10 09:51, , 3F
03/10 09:51, 3F
推
03/10 09:51, , 4F
03/10 09:51, 4F
→
03/10 09:51, , 5F
03/10 09:51, 5F
推
03/10 09:51, , 6F
03/10 09:51, 6F
推
03/10 09:51, , 7F
03/10 09:51, 7F
推
03/10 09:51, , 8F
03/10 09:51, 8F
→
03/10 09:51, , 9F
03/10 09:51, 9F
推
03/10 09:51, , 10F
03/10 09:51, 10F
→
03/10 09:52, , 11F
03/10 09:52, 11F
推
03/10 09:52, , 12F
03/10 09:52, 12F
推
03/10 09:53, , 13F
03/10 09:53, 13F
→
03/10 09:53, , 14F
03/10 09:53, 14F
→
03/10 09:53, , 15F
03/10 09:53, 15F
推
03/10 09:53, , 16F
03/10 09:53, 16F
→
03/10 09:54, , 17F
03/10 09:54, 17F
推
03/10 09:54, , 18F
03/10 09:54, 18F
推
03/10 09:55, , 19F
03/10 09:55, 19F
→
03/10 09:55, , 20F
03/10 09:55, 20F
推
03/10 09:55, , 21F
03/10 09:55, 21F
→
03/10 09:56, , 22F
03/10 09:56, 22F
推
03/10 09:56, , 23F
03/10 09:56, 23F
→
03/10 09:56, , 24F
03/10 09:56, 24F
→
03/10 09:57, , 25F
03/10 09:57, 25F
→
03/10 09:57, , 26F
03/10 09:57, 26F
推
03/10 09:57, , 27F
03/10 09:57, 27F
→
03/10 09:57, , 28F
03/10 09:57, 28F
推
03/10 09:57, , 29F
03/10 09:57, 29F
→
03/10 09:57, , 30F
03/10 09:57, 30F
噓
03/10 09:58, , 31F
03/10 09:58, 31F
推
03/10 09:58, , 32F
03/10 09:58, 32F
→
03/10 09:59, , 33F
03/10 09:59, 33F
→
03/10 09:59, , 34F
03/10 09:59, 34F
→
03/10 09:59, , 35F
03/10 09:59, 35F
推
03/10 10:00, , 36F
03/10 10:00, 36F
→
03/10 10:00, , 37F
03/10 10:00, 37F
→
03/10 10:02, , 38F
03/10 10:02, 38F
→
03/10 10:02, , 39F
03/10 10:02, 39F
→
03/10 10:03, , 40F
03/10 10:03, 40F
推
03/10 10:03, , 41F
03/10 10:03, 41F
推
03/10 10:05, , 42F
03/10 10:05, 42F
推
03/10 10:05, , 43F
03/10 10:05, 43F
→
03/10 10:06, , 44F
03/10 10:06, 44F
推
03/10 10:07, , 45F
03/10 10:07, 45F
推
03/10 10:07, , 46F
03/10 10:07, 46F
推
03/10 10:08, , 47F
03/10 10:08, 47F
推
03/10 10:08, , 48F
03/10 10:08, 48F
→
03/10 10:08, , 49F
03/10 10:08, 49F
→
03/10 10:13, , 50F
03/10 10:13, 50F
推
03/10 10:13, , 51F
03/10 10:13, 51F
→
03/10 10:13, , 52F
03/10 10:13, 52F
推
03/10 10:14, , 53F
03/10 10:14, 53F
→
03/10 10:14, , 54F
03/10 10:14, 54F
→
03/10 10:16, , 55F
03/10 10:16, 55F
→
03/10 10:17, , 56F
03/10 10:17, 56F
推
03/10 10:21, , 57F
03/10 10:21, 57F
→
03/10 10:22, , 58F
03/10 10:22, 58F
推
03/10 10:23, , 59F
03/10 10:23, 59F
推
03/10 10:29, , 60F
03/10 10:29, 60F
推
03/10 10:46, , 61F
03/10 10:46, 61F
推
03/10 10:47, , 62F
03/10 10:47, 62F
→
03/10 10:47, , 63F
03/10 10:47, 63F
推
03/10 10:51, , 64F
03/10 10:51, 64F
→
03/10 10:54, , 65F
03/10 10:54, 65F
推
03/10 11:07, , 66F
03/10 11:07, 66F
噓
03/10 11:16, , 67F
03/10 11:16, 67F
推
03/10 11:24, , 68F
03/10 11:24, 68F
→
03/10 11:25, , 69F
03/10 11:25, 69F
噓
03/10 11:27, , 70F
03/10 11:27, 70F
推
03/10 11:29, , 71F
03/10 11:29, 71F
→
03/10 11:45, , 72F
03/10 11:45, 72F
→
03/10 11:45, , 73F
03/10 11:45, 73F
推
03/10 12:28, , 74F
03/10 12:28, 74F
推
03/10 12:58, , 75F
03/10 12:58, 75F
→
03/10 12:58, , 76F
03/10 12:58, 76F
→
03/10 13:55, , 77F
03/10 13:55, 77F
→
03/10 14:28, , 78F
03/10 14:28, 78F
噓
03/10 17:10, , 79F
03/10 17:10, 79F
推
03/10 17:17, , 80F
03/10 17:17, 80F
噓
03/10 17:28, , 81F
03/10 17:28, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):