Re: [閒聊] 南部職棒市場不好經營的原因是什麼?已回收
※ 引述《trilove ()》之銘言:
: 誰說南部沒消費力??
: Costco從高雄開起來的
: 300萬不到的城市,有兩家Costco
: 請問北北基桃一千多萬人口幾家Costco?
我覺得討論這議題
其實也不需要這麼憤慨
有潛力的市場自然會吸引人投資
何況論新莊與澄清湖,後者硬體還是好上不少
如果最後富邦選擇離開高雄北上組建
當然也不一定是否認南部的消費能力
說不定還有別的考量因素
實在不需要急於證明南部很有消費力
而去否定北部所具有的優勢
--
「我看不到」
「欸 我真的看不到」
「 」
「我還是什麼都看不到啊...」
「我看不到我看不到我看不到!」
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.252.34.117
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1473150569.A.692.html
→
09/06 16:31, , 1F
09/06 16:31, 1F
推
09/06 16:31, , 2F
09/06 16:31, 2F
→
09/06 16:31, , 3F
09/06 16:31, 3F
→
09/06 16:32, , 4F
09/06 16:32, 4F
推
09/06 16:35, , 5F
09/06 16:35, 5F
推
09/06 16:35, , 6F
09/06 16:35, 6F
喜好真的有差,就看球團怎麼分析應對
→
09/06 16:36, , 7F
09/06 16:36, 7F
感覺多數球團還是不想被侷限於區域內,然後就出現四不像的狀況
推
09/06 16:40, , 8F
09/06 16:40, 8F
→
09/06 16:40, , 9F
09/06 16:40, 9F
→
09/06 16:41, , 10F
09/06 16:41, 10F
→
09/06 16:41, , 11F
09/06 16:41, 11F
不一定,統一的百貨業還是以南部為重心
推
09/06 16:43, , 12F
09/06 16:43, 12F
※ 編輯: hugh509 (111.252.34.117), 09/06/2016 16:45:36
→
09/06 16:47, , 13F
09/06 16:47, 13F
推
09/06 16:48, , 14F
09/06 16:48, 14F
推
09/06 17:16, , 15F
09/06 17:16, 15F
→
09/06 17:17, , 16F
09/06 17:17, 16F
→
09/06 17:19, , 17F
09/06 17:19, 17F
推
09/06 17:31, , 18F
09/06 17:31, 18F
→
09/06 17:31, , 19F
09/06 17:31, 19F
→
09/06 17:31, , 20F
09/06 17:31, 20F
→
09/06 17:41, , 21F
09/06 17:41, 21F
→
09/06 17:41, , 22F
09/06 17:41, 22F
→
09/06 17:42, , 23F
09/06 17:42, 23F
推
09/06 17:43, , 24F
09/06 17:43, 24F
推
09/06 17:44, , 25F
09/06 17:44, 25F
推
09/06 17:58, , 26F
09/06 17:58, 26F
→
09/06 17:58, , 27F
09/06 17:58, 27F
→
09/06 17:58, , 28F
09/06 17:58, 28F
推
09/06 18:06, , 29F
09/06 18:06, 29F
→
09/06 18:07, , 30F
09/06 18:07, 30F
推
09/06 18:10, , 31F
09/06 18:10, 31F
→
09/06 18:10, , 32F
09/06 18:10, 32F
→
09/06 18:11, , 33F
09/06 18:11, 33F
→
09/06 18:11, , 34F
09/06 18:11, 34F
→
09/06 18:12, , 35F
09/06 18:12, 35F
→
09/06 18:12, , 36F
09/06 18:12, 36F
→
09/06 18:13, , 37F
09/06 18:13, 37F
→
09/06 18:14, , 38F
09/06 18:14, 38F
→
09/06 18:14, , 39F
09/06 18:14, 39F
推
09/06 18:17, , 40F
09/06 18:17, 40F
→
09/06 18:18, , 41F
09/06 18:18, 41F
→
09/06 18:18, , 42F
09/06 18:18, 42F
→
09/06 18:18, , 43F
09/06 18:18, 43F
→
09/06 18:18, , 44F
09/06 18:18, 44F
→
09/06 18:19, , 45F
09/06 18:19, 45F
→
09/06 18:19, , 46F
09/06 18:19, 46F
→
09/06 18:19, , 47F
09/06 18:19, 47F
→
09/06 18:19, , 48F
09/06 18:19, 48F
→
09/06 18:20, , 49F
09/06 18:20, 49F
→
09/06 18:20, , 50F
09/06 18:20, 50F
→
09/06 19:00, , 51F
09/06 19:00, 51F
推
09/06 21:10, , 52F
09/06 21:10, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 19 之 21 篇):