[新聞] 誰虧1億5000萬? 犀獅都說不是他消失
http://news.tvbs.com.tw/sports/news-643711/
記者 蕭保祥 /台北 報導 2016/03/10 18:05 TVBS
La new集團董事長劉保佑10日表示「去年有球團賠到1億5000萬元」,並表示球隊要有能
力「開源」,否則將不利增隊。2015年票房較低的兩隊統一獅與義大犀牛,都否認這個虧
損數字。
統一與義大球團高層下午接受電話訪問都說,內部財報,不方便透露,「但不是我們這隊
」。
不願具名的消息人士則說,在台灣經營職業球團要損益兩平是難度高的事情,因此企業多
半將職棒投入視為企業責任與廣告曝光,例如統一、中信、義大、Lamigo這4家企業名號
,因為經營職棒而天天出現在新聞版面,廣告效益十足。
劉保佑就曾說過,因為經營職棒,中小企業La new成為台灣民眾耳熟能詳的公司。
這名消息人士說,「犀、獅確實是虧損,也還賠不少,但跟這個數字(1億5000萬元)落
差頗大。」
從有限資料所知,過去唯一公開說過單季有盈餘的球團,是三劍客時期的洪家兄弟象。
--
原來是兄弟虧了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.46.8.200
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1457605963.A.A6A.html
推
03/10 18:33, , 1F
03/10 18:33, 1F
推
03/10 18:33, , 2F
03/10 18:33, 2F
推
03/10 18:33, , 3F
03/10 18:33, 3F
推
03/10 18:33, , 4F
03/10 18:33, 4F
→
03/10 18:34, , 5F
03/10 18:34, 5F
→
03/10 18:34, , 6F
03/10 18:34, 6F
→
03/10 18:34, , 7F
03/10 18:34, 7F
推
03/10 18:34, , 8F
03/10 18:34, 8F
推
03/10 18:34, , 9F
03/10 18:34, 9F
→
03/10 18:34, , 10F
03/10 18:34, 10F
推
03/10 18:34, , 11F
03/10 18:34, 11F
→
03/10 18:34, , 12F
03/10 18:34, 12F
推
03/10 18:35, , 13F
03/10 18:35, 13F
推
03/10 18:35, , 14F
03/10 18:35, 14F
推
03/10 18:35, , 15F
03/10 18:35, 15F
→
03/10 18:35, , 16F
03/10 18:35, 16F
推
03/10 18:35, , 17F
03/10 18:35, 17F
推
03/10 18:35, , 18F
03/10 18:35, 18F
→
03/10 18:35, , 19F
03/10 18:35, 19F
推
03/10 18:36, , 20F
03/10 18:36, 20F
→
03/10 18:36, , 21F
03/10 18:36, 21F
→
03/10 18:36, , 22F
03/10 18:36, 22F
推
03/10 18:36, , 23F
03/10 18:36, 23F
推
03/10 18:36, , 24F
03/10 18:36, 24F
→
03/10 18:36, , 25F
03/10 18:36, 25F
→
03/10 18:36, , 26F
03/10 18:36, 26F
推
03/10 18:37, , 27F
03/10 18:37, 27F
→
03/10 18:37, , 28F
03/10 18:37, 28F
推
03/10 18:37, , 29F
03/10 18:37, 29F
推
03/10 18:37, , 30F
03/10 18:37, 30F
推
03/10 18:38, , 31F
03/10 18:38, 31F
→
03/10 18:38, , 32F
03/10 18:38, 32F
推
03/10 18:38, , 33F
03/10 18:38, 33F
推
03/10 18:38, , 34F
03/10 18:38, 34F
→
03/10 18:38, , 35F
03/10 18:38, 35F
推
03/10 18:38, , 36F
03/10 18:38, 36F
推
03/10 18:38, , 37F
03/10 18:38, 37F
→
03/10 18:38, , 38F
03/10 18:38, 38F
推
03/10 18:39, , 39F
03/10 18:39, 39F
還有 138 則推文
推
03/10 20:00, , 178F
03/10 20:00, 178F
推
03/10 20:00, , 179F
03/10 20:00, 179F
→
03/10 20:01, , 180F
03/10 20:01, 180F
推
03/10 20:02, , 181F
03/10 20:02, 181F
推
03/10 20:02, , 182F
03/10 20:02, 182F
推
03/10 20:02, , 183F
03/10 20:02, 183F
推
03/10 20:03, , 184F
03/10 20:03, 184F
推
03/10 20:05, , 185F
03/10 20:05, 185F
推
03/10 20:05, , 186F
03/10 20:05, 186F
→
03/10 20:22, , 187F
03/10 20:22, 187F
→
03/10 20:26, , 188F
03/10 20:26, 188F
推
03/10 20:30, , 189F
03/10 20:30, 189F
推
03/10 20:36, , 190F
03/10 20:36, 190F
推
03/10 20:39, , 191F
03/10 20:39, 191F
推
03/10 20:49, , 192F
03/10 20:49, 192F
推
03/10 20:50, , 193F
03/10 20:50, 193F
推
03/10 20:52, , 194F
03/10 20:52, 194F
推
03/10 20:52, , 195F
03/10 20:52, 195F
推
03/10 20:52, , 196F
03/10 20:52, 196F
→
03/10 20:52, , 197F
03/10 20:52, 197F
推
03/10 21:04, , 198F
03/10 21:04, 198F
推
03/10 21:07, , 199F
03/10 21:07, 199F
→
03/10 21:14, , 200F
03/10 21:14, 200F
推
03/10 21:28, , 201F
03/10 21:28, 201F
推
03/10 21:34, , 202F
03/10 21:34, 202F
推
03/10 21:50, , 203F
03/10 21:50, 203F
→
03/10 21:50, , 204F
03/10 21:50, 204F
推
03/10 22:00, , 205F
03/10 22:00, 205F
→
03/10 22:01, , 206F
03/10 22:01, 206F
→
03/10 22:01, , 207F
03/10 22:01, 207F
推
03/10 22:27, , 208F
03/10 22:27, 208F
推
03/10 23:38, , 209F
03/10 23:38, 209F
推
03/10 23:55, , 210F
03/10 23:55, 210F
推
03/11 00:10, , 211F
03/11 00:10, 211F
推
03/11 00:13, , 212F
03/11 00:13, 212F
推
03/11 01:14, , 213F
03/11 01:14, 213F
→
03/11 06:57, , 214F
03/11 06:57, 214F
→
03/11 10:05, , 215F
03/11 10:05, 215F
推
03/11 10:08, , 216F
03/11 10:08, 216F
推
03/11 10:42, , 217F
03/11 10:42, 217F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):