[新聞] 哪招?行李櫃「滿了」奧客暴怒飆罵 鬧到升等才滿意
哪招?行李櫃「滿了」奧客暴怒飆罵 鬧到升等才滿意
TVBS
http://news.tvbs.com.tw/local/706225
會吵有糖吃?在今(10日)搭乘往上海的班機上,一名中年男子因為不滿上方的置物箱已
經被其他乘客放滿,害他沒地方放東西,竟當場發怒與人起爭執,還不斷碎念抱怨。而最
後是空姐出來安撫他,將他座位升等,才結束這場鬧劇,而讓拍下這過程的網友也無奈地
說,「有事好好講,服務業很辛苦的!」
ㄧ名網友將影片po上臉書「爆料公社」,無奈表示:「原來吵吵鬧鬧就可以省錢升等呀!
(誤)空服員您辛苦了!」只見畫面中一名男子不斷咒罵,原來是該班機爆滿,男子到位
子時,發現行李櫃上都擺滿了行李,他沒地方放,當場開始吵鬧,認為置物櫃不該是「先
到先得」,他頭頂的位置上就應該有「空位讓他置物」。
而其他乘客看不下去幫忙緩頰,沒想到!竟然被男子嗆說來打架,誰打贏誰放,全部人聽
了好傻眼。終於,有名女乘客看不下去,嗆他說:「妳是男人還女人?妳是女人嗎?你月
經來嗎?」周圍乘客聽完全都拍手叫好。
一陣唇槍舌戰後,男子還是僵持不休!最後是空姐出面安撫他,將座位升等,才結束這鬧
劇,影片PO網後,不少網友留言撻伐:「別為難空服員!」「有本事買商務艙啦!」「原
來這才是升等的真正方法。」但也有人提出質疑,難道會吵的就有糖吃嗎?
======
華航這樣真的會把一些客人寵壞
如果在美國
這種無理取鬧的乘客
早就被趕下飛機了
沒有位置放行李
就請空服員幫忙找空位就好
連這都要吵...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.230.239.220
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Aviation/M.1486725042.A.E95.html
※ 編輯: Rogerisme (61.230.239.220), 02/10/2017 19:12:06
推
02/10 19:19, , 1F
02/10 19:19, 1F
推
02/10 19:20, , 2F
02/10 19:20, 2F
推
02/10 19:38, , 3F
02/10 19:38, 3F
→
02/10 19:38, , 4F
02/10 19:38, 4F
噓
02/10 19:45, , 5F
02/10 19:45, 5F
推
02/10 20:05, , 6F
02/10 20:05, 6F
推
02/10 20:23, , 7F
02/10 20:23, 7F
推
02/10 20:32, , 8F
02/10 20:32, 8F
推
02/10 20:34, , 9F
02/10 20:34, 9F
→
02/10 20:41, , 10F
02/10 20:41, 10F
推
02/10 21:25, , 11F
02/10 21:25, 11F
推
02/10 21:26, , 12F
02/10 21:26, 12F
→
02/10 21:32, , 13F
02/10 21:32, 13F
→
02/10 21:35, , 14F
02/10 21:35, 14F
→
02/10 21:35, , 15F
02/10 21:35, 15F
→
02/10 21:37, , 16F
02/10 21:37, 16F
→
02/10 21:37, , 17F
02/10 21:37, 17F
→
02/10 21:37, , 18F
02/10 21:37, 18F
→
02/10 21:37, , 19F
02/10 21:37, 19F
→
02/10 21:41, , 20F
02/10 21:41, 20F
推
02/10 21:42, , 21F
02/10 21:42, 21F
→
02/10 21:42, , 22F
02/10 21:42, 22F
→
02/10 21:46, , 23F
02/10 21:46, 23F
→
02/10 21:47, , 24F
02/10 21:47, 24F
→
02/10 21:47, , 25F
02/10 21:47, 25F
→
02/10 22:03, , 26F
02/10 22:03, 26F
→
02/10 22:03, , 27F
02/10 22:03, 27F
→
02/10 22:13, , 28F
02/10 22:13, 28F
推
02/10 22:14, , 29F
02/10 22:14, 29F
→
02/10 22:14, , 30F
02/10 22:14, 30F
推
02/10 22:45, , 31F
02/10 22:45, 31F
→
02/10 22:45, , 32F
02/10 22:45, 32F
噓
02/10 23:14, , 33F
02/10 23:14, 33F
→
02/10 23:32, , 34F
02/10 23:32, 34F
→
02/10 23:39, , 35F
02/10 23:39, 35F
推
02/11 01:05, , 36F
02/11 01:05, 36F
推
02/11 01:06, , 37F
02/11 01:06, 37F
推
02/11 01:13, , 38F
02/11 01:13, 38F
推
02/11 01:47, , 39F
02/11 01:47, 39F
推
02/11 02:15, , 40F
02/11 02:15, 40F
推
02/11 03:41, , 41F
02/11 03:41, 41F
→
02/11 03:48, , 42F
02/11 03:48, 42F
推
02/11 03:57, , 43F
02/11 03:57, 43F
推
02/11 05:00, , 44F
02/11 05:00, 44F
推
02/11 07:56, , 45F
02/11 07:56, 45F
→
02/11 11:26, , 46F
02/11 11:26, 46F
推
02/11 11:35, , 47F
02/11 11:35, 47F
→
02/11 11:40, , 48F
02/11 11:40, 48F
推
02/11 12:15, , 49F
02/11 12:15, 49F
→
02/11 12:16, , 50F
02/11 12:16, 50F
推
02/11 12:58, , 51F
02/11 12:58, 51F
推
02/11 17:47, , 52F
02/11 17:47, 52F
推
02/11 17:59, , 53F
02/11 17:59, 53F
→
02/11 19:30, , 54F
02/11 19:30, 54F
→
02/11 19:30, , 55F
02/11 19:30, 55F
→
02/11 20:18, , 56F
02/11 20:18, 56F
→
02/11 20:18, , 57F
02/11 20:18, 57F
→
02/12 01:53, , 58F
02/12 01:53, 58F
→
02/12 11:15, , 59F
02/12 11:15, 59F
推
02/12 11:47, , 60F
02/12 11:47, 60F
→
02/12 11:47, , 61F
02/12 11:47, 61F
推
02/12 12:04, , 62F
02/12 12:04, 62F
噓
02/13 03:38, , 63F
02/13 03:38, 63F
推
02/13 07:52, , 64F
02/13 07:52, 64F
推
02/13 09:41, , 65F
02/13 09:41, 65F
推
02/13 09:51, , 66F
02/13 09:51, 66F
推
02/13 09:58, , 67F
02/13 09:58, 67F
推
02/13 17:30, , 68F
02/13 17:30, 68F
→
02/13 20:28, , 69F
02/13 20:28, 69F
噓
02/15 01:29, , 70F
02/15 01:29, 70F
推
02/16 11:19, , 71F
02/16 11:19, 71F
推
02/16 19:13, , 72F
02/16 19:13, 72F
→
02/16 19:13, , 73F
02/16 19:13, 73F
→
02/16 19:15, , 74F
02/16 19:15, 74F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):