歷年NPB打者轉換聯盟成績比較
看板Asian-MLB作者Roshiel (98.to/evilfox)時間17年前 (2006/10/13 21:00)推噓14(14推 0噓 13→)留言27則, 12人參與討論串1/8 (看更多)
既然投手做了,那就看看打者吧
由於田口壯的血統不夠純正 XD,所以沒有列入計算
如果退步幅度超過15%以上會上色,進步就會上色
一朗 BA OBP SLG IsoD IsoP PA/BB PA/K
2000 0.387 0.466 0.539 0.079 0.152 8.39 12.58
2001 0.350 0.381 0.457 0.031 0.107 24.33 13.77
比較 -9.6% -18.2% -15.2% -60.8% -29.6% -190.1% 9.5%
新庄 BA OBP SLG IsoD IsoP PA/BB PA/K
2000 0.278 0.325 0.491 0.047 0.213 16.97 5.84
2001 0.268 0.320 0.405 0.052 0.137 17.28 6.17
比較 -3.6% -1.5% -17.5% 10.6% -35.7% -1.8% 5.7%
大松井 BA OBP SLG IsoD IsoP PA/BB PA/K
2002 0.334 0.463 0.693 0.129 0.359 5.44 5.96
2003 0.287 0.353 0.435 0.066 0.148 10.94 8.01
比較 -14.1% -23.8% -37.2% -48.8% -58.8% -101.1% 34.4%
小松井 BA OBP SLG IsoD IsoP PA/BB PA/K
2003 0.305 0.365 0.549 0.060 0.244 11.75 5.21
2004 0.272 0.331 0.396 0.059 0.124 12.55 5.18
比較 -10.8% -9.3% -27.9% -1.7% -49.2% -6.8% 0.7%
井口 BA OBP SLG IsoD IsoP PA/BB PA/K
2004 0.333 0.393 0.549 0.060 0.216 12.04 6.29
2005 0.278 0.342 0.438 0.064 0.160 12.00 4.95
比較 -16.5% -13.0% -20.2% 6.7% -25.9% 0.4% -21.3%
城島 BA OBP SLG IsoD IsoP PA/BB PA/K
2005 0.309 0.381 0.557 0.072 0.248 14.42 14.88
2006 0.291 0.332 0.451 0.041 0.160 26.95 11.72
比較 -5.8% -12.9% -19.0% -43.1% -35.5% -86.8% -21.2%
結論:1.幾乎所有指標都會退步
2.長打能力(IsoP)會大幅退步是可以預期的,但令我意外的是
居然連選球能力(IsoD)也是大幅退步,只有三人沒有大幅退步
(而且這三人還頗讓人意外的 XD)
3.BA的衰退沒有這麼嚴重,不過還是衰退
4.多數打者變的更不容易被三振(PA/K),難道是揮棒態度改變?
不過,更更更難拿到保送(PA/BB),應該是因為長打能力的不足導致
所以,來看看岩村吧
岩村 BA OBP SLG IsoD IsoP PA/BB PA/K
2006 0.310 0.386 0.548 0.076 0.238 8.97 4.81
2007 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.163.191.184
推
10/13 21:24, , 1F
10/13 21:24, 1F
推
10/13 21:26, , 2F
10/13 21:26, 2F
推
10/13 21:27, , 3F
10/13 21:27, 3F
推
10/13 22:02, , 4F
10/13 22:02, 4F
推
10/13 22:05, , 5F
10/13 22:05, 5F
推
10/13 22:38, , 6F
10/13 22:38, 6F
推
10/13 23:22, , 7F
10/13 23:22, 7F
→
10/13 23:23, , 8F
10/13 23:23, 8F
→
10/13 23:23, , 9F
10/13 23:23, 9F
→
10/13 23:24, , 10F
10/13 23:24, 10F
→
10/13 23:25, , 11F
10/13 23:25, 11F
→
10/13 23:27, , 12F
10/13 23:27, 12F
推
10/14 00:24, , 13F
10/14 00:24, 13F
→
10/14 00:25, , 14F
10/14 00:25, 14F
→
10/14 00:25, , 15F
10/14 00:25, 15F
→
10/14 00:26, , 16F
10/14 00:26, 16F
推
10/14 22:59, , 17F
10/14 22:59, 17F
推
10/15 08:03, , 18F
10/15 08:03, 18F
推
10/17 18:32, , 19F
10/17 18:32, 19F
推
10/17 21:29, , 20F
10/17 21:29, 20F
→
10/17 21:30, , 21F
10/17 21:30, 21F
→
10/17 21:31, , 22F
10/17 21:31, 22F
→
10/17 21:32, , 23F
10/17 21:32, 23F
推
10/19 06:30, , 24F
10/19 06:30, 24F
推
10/20 03:51, , 25F
10/20 03:51, 25F
→
10/20 03:52, , 26F
10/20 03:52, 26F
→
06/30 19:22,
4年前
, 27F
06/30 19:22, 27F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):