Re: [新聞] 輔大止血性侵爭議 社科院長夏林清遭停職
我不是很清楚轉這篇來博後板的目的為何,是因為夏林清有PhD的關係嗎?不過別誤會,其
實我並不反對轉這篇文章。純粹是很客觀地提這個問題,YOPOYOPO想要討論什麼?
從另外一個角度來看,YOPOYOPO想要討論什麼其實也不重要,因為我自己看了這消息之後
有我想要討論的點。
首先,這事件讓我想到先前爭論過一陣子的,助教(助理)辦理勞健保的事情。這件事再
度顯示,對老師最有利的做法,就是「一切依法辦理,謝謝」!至於對學生是否最有利?
這點可能就有些爭議。當初我提出的看法是:反正錢是固定的,這裡多支出,就那邊削一
點回來。總之,對老師而言這樣做絕對不會出事,即使有人抗議,也是教育部、科技部的
錯。我不只在PTT這樣主張,在我們系上的會議裡面也這樣主張,還真的替系上精算了,
要怎樣解決課程助教的問題。最後結果,我的主張自然是沒有被採納。現在全台灣大概都
學臺大吧?把助理分成勞務和學習兩型。會不會安全下莊呢?天曉得。
再來想談談心理咨商這回事(原文下半部)。我沒有真的仔細研究過夏教授的理論,只能
概括性地說。底下那個誰說夏林清的理論失敗,平實地說,不完全認同,但是也不完全反
對。社會科學領域的版友就知道,所有社會科學(心理學)領域的理論、觀察、實驗結果等
等,通通是建立在對一個分佈的描述上面。既然是分佈,就一定有變異、個體差異等等東
西。所以,所謂成功的理論,或者說顯著的實驗結果,不是說全體人類100%都會乖乖地依
照你的規則來做,而是你可以準確地說,平均(或者中位數)會這樣子變化。以中位數來
說,意思就是有一半的人會比這個數值大,另外一半比較小。現在很明顯地,夏林清的理
論在這位性侵受害者的身上不成立。然而,這是因為夏林清對於平均(中位數)的預測錯
誤呢?還是說這位受害者位在分佈的兩端?我不曉得。
不過有一件事我確定,該走的程序無論如何還是得趕快走,因為這是老師保護自己的最佳
策略。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.123.185.72
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/AfterPhD/M.1474691759.A.17B.html
→
09/24 15:12, , 1F
09/24 15:12, 1F
→
09/24 15:13, , 2F
09/24 15:13, 2F
→
09/24 15:13, , 3F
09/24 15:13, 3F
→
09/24 15:14, , 4F
09/24 15:14, 4F
→
09/24 15:14, , 5F
09/24 15:14, 5F
→
09/24 15:15, , 6F
09/24 15:15, 6F
→
09/24 15:16, , 7F
09/24 15:16, 7F
→
09/24 15:17, , 8F
09/24 15:17, 8F
→
09/24 15:17, , 9F
09/24 15:17, 9F
推
09/24 19:24, , 10F
09/24 19:24, 10F
→
09/24 19:25, , 11F
09/24 19:25, 11F
→
09/24 19:26, , 12F
09/24 19:26, 12F
→
09/24 19:26, , 13F
09/24 19:26, 13F
推
09/24 20:11, , 14F
09/24 20:11, 14F
→
09/24 20:12, , 15F
09/24 20:12, 15F
推
09/24 21:23, , 16F
09/24 21:23, 16F
推
09/24 22:40, , 17F
09/24 22:40, 17F
→
09/24 22:41, , 18F
09/24 22:41, 18F
→
09/24 22:43, , 19F
09/24 22:43, 19F
→
09/24 22:44, , 20F
09/24 22:44, 20F
→
09/24 22:45, , 21F
09/24 22:45, 21F
→
09/24 22:46, , 22F
09/24 22:46, 22F
→
09/24 22:47, , 23F
09/24 22:47, 23F
→
09/24 22:48, , 24F
09/24 22:48, 24F
→
09/24 22:48, , 25F
09/24 22:48, 25F
→
09/24 22:49, , 26F
09/24 22:49, 26F
推
09/24 23:05, , 27F
09/24 23:05, 27F
推
09/25 00:29, , 28F
09/25 00:29, 28F
→
09/25 00:29, , 29F
09/25 00:29, 29F
→
09/25 00:30, , 30F
09/25 00:30, 30F
→
09/25 00:30, , 31F
09/25 00:30, 31F
→
09/25 00:55, , 32F
09/25 00:55, 32F
→
09/25 00:55, , 33F
09/25 00:55, 33F
→
09/25 00:57, , 34F
09/25 00:57, 34F
→
09/25 00:57, , 35F
09/25 00:57, 35F
→
09/25 01:01, , 36F
09/25 01:01, 36F
→
09/25 01:01, , 37F
09/25 01:01, 37F
→
09/25 01:02, , 38F
09/25 01:02, 38F
→
09/25 01:02, , 39F
09/25 01:02, 39F
還有 141 則推文
→
09/27 01:18, , 181F
09/27 01:18, 181F
推
09/27 01:56, , 182F
09/27 01:56, 182F
→
09/27 01:57, , 183F
09/27 01:57, 183F
→
09/27 01:58, , 184F
09/27 01:58, 184F
推
09/27 03:29, , 185F
09/27 03:29, 185F
推
09/27 12:47, , 186F
09/27 12:47, 186F
→
09/27 12:50, , 187F
09/27 12:50, 187F
→
09/27 12:51, , 188F
09/27 12:51, 188F
→
09/27 12:51, , 189F
09/27 12:51, 189F
→
09/27 12:52, , 190F
09/27 12:52, 190F
→
09/27 12:53, , 191F
09/27 12:53, 191F
→
09/27 12:54, , 192F
09/27 12:54, 192F
推
09/27 12:58, , 193F
09/27 12:58, 193F
推
09/27 16:51, , 194F
09/27 16:51, 194F
→
09/27 16:52, , 195F
09/27 16:52, 195F
→
09/27 16:53, , 196F
09/27 16:53, 196F
推
09/27 19:53, , 197F
09/27 19:53, 197F
推
09/27 20:21, , 198F
09/27 20:21, 198F
→
09/27 20:22, , 199F
09/27 20:22, 199F
→
09/27 20:23, , 200F
09/27 20:23, 200F
→
09/27 20:24, , 201F
09/27 20:24, 201F
推
09/27 20:54, , 202F
09/27 20:54, 202F
→
09/27 20:55, , 203F
09/27 20:55, 203F
推
09/27 23:25, , 204F
09/27 23:25, 204F
→
09/27 23:52, , 205F
09/27 23:52, 205F
→
09/27 23:54, , 206F
09/27 23:54, 206F
→
09/27 23:55, , 207F
09/27 23:55, 207F
→
09/27 23:55, , 208F
09/27 23:55, 208F
→
09/27 23:56, , 209F
09/27 23:56, 209F
→
09/28 00:21, , 210F
09/28 00:21, 210F
→
09/28 00:30, , 211F
09/28 00:30, 211F
→
09/28 00:32, , 212F
09/28 00:32, 212F
→
09/28 08:13, , 213F
09/28 08:13, 213F
→
09/28 08:13, , 214F
09/28 08:13, 214F
→
09/28 08:14, , 215F
09/28 08:14, 215F
推
09/29 02:16, , 216F
09/29 02:16, 216F
→
09/29 02:17, , 217F
09/29 02:17, 217F
→
09/29 02:18, , 218F
09/29 02:18, 218F
→
09/29 02:20, , 219F
09/29 02:20, 219F
→
09/29 02:20, , 220F
09/29 02:20, 220F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):