作者查詢 / waitwind
作者 waitwind 在 PTT 全部看板的留言(推文), 共26412則
限定看板:全部
看板排序:
全部C_Chat13256Gossiping5717Palmar_Drama3073Suckcomic934Isayama932NBA789HatePolitics698PCCU_Talk190KINGDOM87PushDoll76JinYong50nCoV201938Military34joke27movie24KingdomHuang23Lifeismoney22Atheism18Tainan18Chen-Hsing17Ocean17Test17StupidClown16Stock15WomenTalk13PublicIssue12Hate11historia11EYESHIELD219book8Linux8drawing7C_GenreBoard6EatToDie6NBAEasyChat6TPC_Police6Confucianism5creditcard5FLAT_CLUB5give5Little-Games5RumikoTWorld5Anti-ramp4Buddhism4Nurse4A1-GP3Chan_Mou3CYSH97Y3183Hunter3Insurance3Koei3L_TalkandCha3BERSERK2BigShiLin2BLEACH2Celtics2Doraemon2DPP2Feminism2GossipPicket2Hornets2Jeans2Kaohsiung2Knicks2KS96-3182NDHU-phy952Old-Games2pts2sex2specialman2THU-HIS972YZU_CN99A2About_Life1AC_In1ArakawaCow1ASHS-94sin1AT_PingPong1Bank_Service1bi-sexual1Boy-Girl1Broad_Band1CampusTour1ck56th3311cksh81st3091CMJH_93_3051CPU_CID7311Cross_Life1CSU1CyberFormula1Daan1Design1Disabled1DSLR1emprisenovel1Emulator1EZsoft1Falcom1FCU-ELEC-92A1FJU-ACCR941gallantry1Gantz1Geography1GIEE_BASKET1Gintama1globe1Hawks1HCHS933141HCSH1HisShark1HK_Comics1HLHS5thU1HLHS_10thU1HOT_Game1Hsinchu1HSNU_11351I.O.I1IA1ILSH-973051KoreaStar1KS92-3011KS92-3191LaClippers1LAW1LeBronJames1Marginalman1NCCU07_Ghis1NCCU_SEED1NCHU-Stat1NDHU-dc961NDMC-D611NIU_Talk1NKNU_OECE1001NOCHIGH1NTHU_STAT941NTNUch-941NTOU-EBFS921NTOU-MME-99B1NTU_BOTDorm1NTUChallenge1NtuDormM11NtuDormM31NTUDormM71NtuDormM81NTUE_NSE1001NTUE_Nse1011NTUE_Nse1021NTUE_Nse961NTUE_Nse991NTUEE_BL5271NTUEE_Lab5541NTUHI1NTUmed911NTUST-EMA1NUK_EE100A1NUU_Talk1ONE_PIECE1PCCU_AM1PCSH91_3051Peter_EN1PM1RTS1Salary1SAN1SCU-History1SHUTA1Soft_Job1SSSH-16th-Fk1streetfight1SYSOP1TA_AN1TaichungBun1TallClub1Tech_Job1TFG01Liang1TFSHS65th3221TFSHS66th3121THU-CHE961TigerBlue1Timberwolves1Tin-Ha1TKU_trans1TuTsau1UTAH-JAZZ1Warfare1WarHammer1Xien1YoungDotx31Yup-mwgc1Yup00-031Yup03-041<< 收起看板(190)
32F噓: 覺得不是誘姦就去辯駁啊!這世界又不是只看單方說詞05/05 17:55
13F噓: 何必假惺惺裝模作樣引用片段,直接說她父母騙人就好啦05/05 17:40
38F噓: "或是"是你這樣理解的嗎?不過都可以把誘直接定義成被05/05 17:35
39F→: 吸引,解釋成自動坐上去,還需要討論什麼?直接噓05/05 17:36
52F→: 看訪談之後,能有這種解讀,還有不少推文,人性真美啊!X!05/05 17:37
136F推: 推05/05 18:48
88F推: 太理性了,理性到痛,如果能單純痛恨就不會那麼痛吧05/05 16:45
101F→: 這不是斯德哥爾摩症侯群!如果是的,怎能如此思辨?05/05 16:48
103F→: 如果是的話,那也必是過往,而不是訪談的那個時空05/05 16:49
119F推: 倒也不完全是對文學的幻滅,是很矛盾的看到美又看到惡..05/05 16:53
485F推: 推psyche....05/05 18:38
13F推: 推推推~~~05/04 23:06
65F推: 那如果被邀請去老師家中呢?也能構成機會嗎?05/04 23:23
114F推: 唉...其實就作家的敘述,那是一種病態,是自我保護機制05/04 23:36
117F→: 但心靈層次的東西拿到法院要如何證明大概很困難吧...05/04 23:36
13F推: 推推推~~~05/04 23:06
65F推: 那如果被邀請去老師家中呢?也能構成機會嗎?05/04 23:23
114F推: 唉...其實就作家的敘述,那是一種病態,是自我保護機制05/04 23:36
117F→: 但心靈層次的東西拿到法院要如何證明大概很困難吧...05/04 23:36
13F推: 推推推~~~05/04 23:06
65F推: 那如果被邀請去老師家中呢?也能構成機會嗎?05/04 23:23
114F推: 唉...其實就作家的敘述,那是一種病態,是自我保護機制05/04 23:36
117F→: 但心靈層次的東西拿到法院要如何證明大概很困難吧...05/04 23:36
25F→: 又一位從加州朋友文字中推論是師生戀的~05/05 13:45
36F→: 講誘姦是從父母聲明、小說內容得來的推測,說鐵證很少吧05/05 13:49
39F→: 至於講合意、女方獻身的,推論依據不從加州朋友要從哪邊05/05 13:50
41F→: 訪談紀錄所講的師生戀是事後的病態吧,應非討論重點?05/05 13:52
47F→: 喔!非100%所以不是鐵證啊,可是你的你情我願的依據是?05/05 13:54
58F→: 你這麼講求證據,一定有很堅強的依據去說這是你情我願~05/05 13:58
59F→: 快說一下吧,你到底根據什麼論斷是師生戀的你情我願~05/05 13:58
62F→: 你的依據是女方說這是誘姦?想必你做愛也都說是相姦~~~05/05 13:59
10F推: 推05/05 13:37