作者查詢 / sunev
作者 sunev 在 PTT [ Physics ] 看板的留言(推文), 共847則
限定看板:Physics
看板排序:
全部MATLAB1767Physics847Chemistry723Math597Little-Games251CFantasy145GO138Beauty124Gossiping113HwangYih82Facebook75NBA66joke63Wikipedia44StupidClown43ask-why36Mathematica36PttSuggest36Taiwan31936SchoolRumble27LaTeX24LightNovel24specialman24historia23SYSOP23C_and_CPP22Haruhi20MAC17PlayStation17PttBug17GIS16movie15Baseball14NTU14JP_Entertain13Browsers12TW_Entertain11CultureShock10HatePolitics9MLB9Asian-MLB8gallantry8BBSmovie7CSSE7StarCraft7NY-Yankees6PttCurrent6PttHistory6DummyHistory5Google5guitar5Hiking5Militarylife5paranormal5Tennis5Adachi4C_Chat4ComGame-Plan4nCoV20194NDHU-Ch1024NUK_AC1004PCSH91_3054Sabermetrics4Sangokumusou4SlamDunk4TheMatrix4Tsao4Cross_Life3FacebookBM3japanavgirls3L_TalkandCha3Minecraft3PhD3CCF2ChemEng2Fantasy2hardware2Military2NCCU02_BA2NDHU-MSE922NSwitch2Python2Railway2Road2SailorMoon2ScienceNote2StarWars2Steam2TuTsau2Video2cat1CH-PINGPONG1China-Drama1ck51st3321cksh75th151CLUB_KABA1CMWang1Fighters1FJU-TM1FLAT_CLUB1GambleGhost1GameDesign1GFonGuard1HandMade1Hate1HCKuo1HSNU_9631Jeans1KOTDFansClub1KS91-3021KS91-3031KS92-3131KS94-3091KS_PMAC1l9761LAW1LinuxDev1NAOE-861NCCU04_ETHNO1NCCU04_TUR1NCCU_TEA1NCHU_ILST1NCKU_MEPhC1NTUCH-HW1NTUCH-SPORT1NTUDormG31NtuDormM81NTUE-Art971Olympics_ISG1PCman1PeopleSeries1Programming1PublicIssue1rabbit1RealPlaying1RSSH94_3011Sassy-babe1SHAQ1Sharapova1sky1SM04th011Soft_Job1SSSH-16th-Fk1Statistics1StephenCurry1Suckcomic1SuperHeroes1TA_AN1Tea1Test1THU_BA20001THUID_Grad1TigerBlue1Transport981TTU-I90B1Weyslii1Windows1wretch1Wrong_spell1YOLO1<< 收起看板(160)
4F推: 月地距離除以光速估一下時間,再去乘地球自轉速度吧06/17 03:11
6F推: 紅位移?05/30 12:57
67F推: 身障甄試的考題和一般甄試考題有何不同?04/19 00:07
31F推: 問題就在於,離開數學計算的物理和胡說八道也沒什麼兩樣。03/27 10:59
32F→: 既然ChatGPT有亂算數學的傾向,那他對於物理的看法就沒有03/27 10:59
33F→: 參考的價值。03/27 10:59
38F推: 回樓上,不牽涉數學計算的當然也是可以做物理討論,03/27 14:55
39F→: 但前提是雙方都有基礎的數理邏輯,但ChatGPT目前顯03/27 14:56
40F→: 然此能力尚待加強。你也同意ChatGPT的言論有真有假,03/27 14:56
41F→: 受過訓練的人固然可以取其精華去其糟粕,但若有人只03/27 14:56
42F→: 是ChatGPT的傳聲筒,與大量真假不明的資訊爭論耗費03/27 14:56
43F→: 精力,對方也不一定受教;不爭論又怕錯誤資訊橫行,03/27 14:56
44F→: 這樣就很干擾版上秩序了。03/27 14:57
10F推: 電子繞核與重力無關吧,何來失重?03/05 02:26
1F推: 有機關02/26 00:32
28F推: 廣義相義論?02/15 10:52
15F推: time dimension 超過1也太酷,故事線要變故事面了嗎01/19 01:27
1F推: 在講到分子時,特意強調原子「核」是件奇怪的事。12/22 12:29
4F推: 恆星基本上是中性,原子跑出來不會帶太多電。退一萬步來說12/22 16:56
5F→: 帶8+的氧原子核會和帶1+的氫原子核反應成水嗎?12/22 16:56
11F推: 所以你要和我說有電漿態的水?電子到處飛還有化學鍵可言嗎12/24 03:41
17F推: 但不會有H+碰到O8+變成水這事吧12/26 01:22
19F推: 所以這就是我要質疑的,談到化學反應時,不該說原子「核」12/26 04:23
2F推: 美國老爸不會準的吧.....12/15 02:47