作者查詢 / solidus
作者 solidus 在 PTT 全部看板的留言(推文), 共1968則
限定看板:全部
看板排序:
全部media-chaos662Hearthstone519nCoV2019285cksh80th30197Steam70BoardGame62C_Chat48MysticWiz43Wrestle18HatePolitics17Golden-Award16movie12Gossiping9PeopleSeries9Shu-Lin6ShuangHe6SongShan6AHQ3Ahqwestdoor3WOW3DIABLO2FJU-BA91C2joke2NCUFingrad032Olympics_ISG2SYSOP2Tennis2ADS1B88A012XX1B90205XXX1B921010XX1CGU-MED-991Chan_Mou1ck50th3231ck51st3291ck52nd3131ck54th3241ck55th3121cksh80th3091CKSHHG22th1CS_Badminton1CTSH913021FJ_Astroclub1FJU_GF1FlashWolves1GooGin1HSNU_9381HSNU_9901KingdomHuang1KS90-3091Lifeismoney1MingDao33H21mobile-game1NANLIN3011NCCU02_PSYCH1NCCU03_ETHNO1NCCU03_PF1NCCU99_Stat1NCHU-AGR001NCKU-YP1NDMC-M1031NDMC-PH231NSwitch1NTOU-YP1NTU-IPH921NTUBSE-B-911NTUE-Art961NTUST-DT92-11Old-Games1PCCU-AT-91C1perique1R923220PA1RSSH94_3011SM02th031SSSH-13th3111TFG02Winner1TFGO2SHOOT1TS3rdZheng1TTU-US941Ur-hsing1YP91-3031YP91-3091YP91-3111Yup01-011Yup01-061Yup02-011Yup98-091<< 收起看板(87)
2F推:晚上的話我就OK09/07 20:26
1F→:這兩個禮拜六的中午我都有事= =09/07 00:40
11F推:推這個建議61.228.46.53 09/07 00:49
1F→:這篇引的新聞跟前篇的主題有什麼關聯嗎?61.228.37.56 09/04 00:32
3F→:恩,不過這兩篇沒提到該公司要進口的消息61.228.37.56 09/04 00:34
5F→:,前篇作者要反擊的是這點吧61.228.37.56 09/04 00:36
5F→:若真是如此,建議原波將檢測資料廣為流傳61.228.37.56 09/04 00:30
6F→:,也多向各家媒體或NCC作反應。61.228.37.56 09/04 00:31
9F→:在未辨明真偽的情形下,沒必要噓來噓去61.228.37.56 09/04 00:33
2F→:國內媒體該做的是警惕而非跟風61.228.37.56 09/03 23:40
4F→:沒錯,這篇又是自由影劇撈過界提政治61.228.37.64 09/02 10:39
5F→:另外,反串者請收斂一點61.228.37.64 09/02 10:40
42F→:給jamesppi,不反串的理由很簡單,因為反61.228.36.3 09/03 09:45
43F→:串是對於在這個版還願意平實討論者的全面61.228.36.3 09/03 09:46
44F→:蔑視。61.228.36.3 09/03 09:46
45F→:如果真的有心要檢討媒體亂象,那麼打政治61.228.36.3 09/03 09:49
46F→:口水戰絕對是最沒效益的作法。61.228.36.3 09/03 09:50
49F→:其實很難分別究竟亂政治與反串孰先孰後,61.228.37.56 09/03 23:31
50F→:因為這兩者幾乎是同時會出現,有因為政治61.228.37.56 09/03 23:32
51F→:語言而反串者,也有因反串而戰政治者。這61.228.37.56 09/03 23:33
52F→:兩種語言都是在蔑視願意平實討論者的努力61.228.37.56 09/03 23:35
53F→:。這裡只提到反串是因為本篇推文反串太多61.228.37.56 09/03 23:36
54F→:,希望這能回答JCC版友的疑惑。61.228.37.56 09/03 23:39
14F→:這篇的觀點持平,值得推薦。61.228.37.64 09/02 11:03
15F→:另外請不要依政治立場就亂噓人61.228.37.64 09/02 11:04
20F→:推原波。不過由於我在月初也看過一樣背景61.228.32.68 08/31 00:55
21F→:的報導,該報導裡只寫到十秒不會引發性慾61.228.32.68 08/31 00:57
22F→:但卻沒提行為不是強制的理由,我不確定是61.228.32.68 08/31 00:58
23F→:否法官真的有說過不會引發性慾的話61.228.32.68 08/31 00:59
12F→:難道真的難以期待曾經平時討論者能繼續保61.228.42.124 08/30 09:54
13F→:持嗎?帳號一換又開始反串....61.228.42.124 08/30 09:56