作者查詢 / sendtony6

總覽項目：發文 | 留言 | 暱稱

作者 sendtony6 在 PTT [ Lawyer ] 看板的留言(推文), 共22則

限定看板：Lawyer

看板排序：

全部Tech_Job7085HatePolitics1158WomenTalk977Boy-Girl827Aquarium622Gossiping367home-sale350tutor247Stock172CareerPlan170MenTalk167car162RDSS83WorkinChina77Salary60Dance_Sport56Univ_BRDance56NightLife53cat51uni-talk50sex46ChemEng40TOEIC40AllTogether39NSYSU37MuscleBeach34CATCH33PushDoll32trans_math31Bioindustry30marriage28UniversityTV27SMSlife25ArenaOfValor22Lawyer22RealmOfValor22esahc21KMT21SENIORHIGH20CarShop19CS_TEACHER19Daliao18marvel18Master_D18HomeTeach17NSYSU_MSOE9717TransPhys17cksh83rd30716KHCHS_TALK16NCCU07_RMI16NCHU-FS10016NTUBA9916YP94-31216FITNESS14MobileComm14UglyClub14joke10ONE_PIECE10Tainan10You_out9dance8e-shopping8RESIT7ComeHere6feminine_sex6need_student6bicycle5DJ_fightman5Examination5Kaohsiung5nb-shopping5rent-exp5Soft_Job5Bellydance4Bread4E-appliance4Engineer4JD_Lover4Mix_Match4part-time4swim4V_ScHooL4Wanted4AfterPhD3BoardGame3ck61st3203DC3Drink3facelift3Fooyin3HSNU_10083Mechanical3medstudent3NTU3PhD3PttLifeLaw3PublicServan3chatskill2creditcard2Cross_Life2Employee2EngTalk2Finance2FongShan2Hong_Kong2Miaoli2Nantou2NDMC-Dancing2NTUEE-MBElab2study2Teacher2Viator91bing2aqua-shop1Arthropoda1BeautyBody1ChangHua1Childhood1ck56th3181ck56th3221cksh79th3101cohabitation1couple1CPU_PA7311Crystal1Digitalhome1Education1FamilyCircle1firsttime1FJU-EE-2001a1GetMarry1GoodPregnan1HateP_Picket1HCSHch13_3111Hsinchu1HSNU_10981HSNU_9631isLandTravel1KOF1KS91-3111KS92-3041KS94-3071L_LifeJob1LAW1Mancare1medache1movie1NCCU04_TUR1NCCU99_BANK1NCCU_PubLaw1NCHU-FS981NDHU-phy941NDMC-D621NEMS1NSYSU_MSOE001NSYSU_MSOE011NTU-MD1NTUGIPO_307A1NTUT_EE490A1Plant1PresidentLi1SCU_CIS-90B1TaichungBun1TigerBlue1transgender1Volunteer1Wanhua1YP92-3041<< 收起看板(167)

首頁

尾頁

Re: [問題] 關於律師推薦與付款方式

[ Lawyer ]4 留言, 推噓總分: +1

作者: sendtony6 - 發表於 2017/09/10 08:08(6年前)

2^F→sendtony6: 其實我也不清楚。。。待檢查官通知開庭中09/10 19:33

4^F→sendtony6: 只知道已起訴09/18 11:54

Re: [問題] 關於律師推薦與付款方式

[ Lawyer ]54 留言, 推噓總分: +23

作者: Medus - 發表於 2017/09/10 00:46(6年前)

5^F推sendtony6: 一審總共是39萬哦。。。09/10 00:55

6^F→sendtony6: 但是我想強調的不是便宜與否09/10 00:55

8^F→sendtony6: 而是既然委任狀是寫了一到三審，事後加收的理由是???09/10 00:56

10^F→sendtony6: 樓上道長說的沒錯，但目前是針對民事二審上訴為何加收?09/10 00:57

15^F推sendtony6: 那原本的委任狀的意義????09/10 00:59

16^F→sendtony6: sorry,我不清楚稱呼，如有冒犯請見諒09/10 00:59

17^F→sendtony6: 我是該案件當事人。。。09/10 01:00

19^F→sendtony6: 而我二審上訴費用5~7萬已噴出去了09/10 01:01

27^F推sendtony6: 我沒有攻擊誰，我只是陳述我遇到的事。。。而且我認為09/10 01:05

28^F→sendtony6: 這明顯不符合行情，但事後加收也不正確09/10 01:05

30^F推sendtony6: 這是直接影響我們當事人權益，該有的行情卻低價，事後09/10 01:07

31^F→sendtony6: 又提高09/10 01:07

34^F推sendtony6: 我無意攻擊任何人，只是提出我的疑問，如果覺得不託我09/10 01:10

35^F→sendtony6: 可刪文就是了09/10 01:10

37^F→sendtony6: 已刪文，此備份文請原po自行處理09/10 01:12

42^F推sendtony6: 當初並無契約，我一直以為委任狀就是契約，看來在司法09/10 13:04

43^F→sendtony6: 界似乎不是這樣，受教了。。。09/10 13:04

46^F推sendtony6: 那...我的寫一至三審是???09/10 18:46

48^F推sendtony6: 我想問的是，類似這樣的情況(以低於行情價委任後再加09/10 19:32

49^F→sendtony6: 收費用)是常規嗎?09/10 19:32

首頁

尾頁