作者查詢 / seekforever
作者 seekforever 在 PTT [ SHU_IPR ] 看板的留言(推文), 共13則
限定看板:SHU_IPR
看板排序:
全部RedSox15062Celtics4626TaichungBun3278MLB2284home-sale1785NBA745Baseball672Foreign_Inv473Stock227Examination180Cavaliers160NY-Yankees152Law-Fala142Dodgers123Sixers119Rangers117Gossiping102car84Braves76Brewers69ChicagoBulls65MOD64Phillies60Mariners54BLAZERS49Military47Lawyer45Royals44Olympics_ISG36CFP33Thunder32Blue_Jays31B93A013XX29NY-Mets29Diamondbacks28Astros27Orioles27Spurs27Angels26Rockies26HatePolitics25Nationals25Pirates25Athletics24Cubs23Indians22HolySee21Lifeismoney21Artfilm20DET_Tigers19MIN-Twins19B94A013XX18Kings18Cardinals17Japan_Living17Marlins17UTAH-JAZZ17Rays16Reds16Timberwolves15SHU_IPR13Shu-Lin11ShuangHe11SongShan11Padres10Softball10cat9MobileComm9SFGiants9WomenTalk9Liverpool7NTUcourse7NTULCSA7Grizzlies6LaClippers6Law-Basket6Rockets6WhiteSox6creditcard5Knicks5movie5Nuggets5PublicServan5Raptors5Food4Hawks4Hornets4KingdomHuang4Nets4B94310XXX3B98A013XX3Digitalhome3FBaseball3graduate3NTU_BOTDorm23NTUJapanR923Patent3SMSlife3Accounting2Chan_Mou2G-S-WARRIORS2Japan_Travel2MiamiHeat2NTUBA99study2NTUDormM62NTUSA2Pelicans2Philo-052PHX-Suns2Spain_PL2Tainan2TaiwanDrama2Tech_Job2Tennis2TTU-AFL2TTU-IM2AnimMovie1Asia1B923021XX1B923022XX1B923023XX1B92A012XX1B92A013XX1B933021XX1b942040XX1B94A012XX1B95303XXX1B95310XXX1B961010XX1B96310XXX1B97310XXX1B97A011XX1B97A013XX1B98A012XX1bookhouse1ck55th3141ck57th3011CntrbndList1DoubleMajor1FAPL1FLAT_CLUB1FSHS-95-3011HK_Comics1HSNU_10661Hualien1Japandrama1joke1KS93-3161LAW1LawService1lizen33-6041LTK1MacShop1medstudent1MINGDAO1NBA_Picket1NCAA1NCKU-PHY951nCoV20191NTHU_ChStudy1NTU-Exam1NTU-K91NTU_BOTDorm1NtuDormF21NtuDormF31NTUDormF41NtuDormF51NTUDormF71NTUDormFJr1NTUDormG11NtuDormM11NtuDormM21NtuDormM31NtuDormM41NtuDormM51NTUDormM71NtuDormM81NTUniNews1NTURockClub1Prospect1R953220PT1SeibuLions1SHU_LawGrad1Taichung38th1TFSHS64th3161TFSHS66th3191TheWall1VET_931Wizards1<< 收起看板(189)
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁
1F→:對阿 所以仔細想想 這問題其實很有趣推 01/09 00:45
2F→:不過這個環境下 創作者不把知識拿去變價似乎有難度推 01/09 00:50
14F→:原來這種事情也沒想像中的荒謬推 11/04 21:35
1F→:標題蠻爛的 不過內容值得參考~推 09/10 01:18
3F→:thx推 09/08 11:17
4F→:好像也不是說很好拿吧 只是名額稍微多一些推 09/11 23:27
1F→:我了解學長的意思 不過罪刑規定內容的適正似乎推 10/19 21:09
2F→:就已經可以包含其他兩個層次了??推 10/19 21:10
13F→:我的意思是說 如果法律規定的罪刑內容適正推 10/19 21:28
14F→:那麼似乎就可以涵蓋法定與明確性的要求了推 10/19 21:28
15F→:因為沒有法定與明確性很難說它是具備正當性的刑罰推 10/19 21:29
22F→:我再想想 謝謝學長的回應~!!!!推 10/21 01:46
8F→:可以聽聽學長對這個罪的看法嗎??推 10/09 02:00
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁