作者查詢 / Ortos
作者 Ortos 在 PTT [ GreenParty ] 看板的留言(推文), 共25則
限定看板:GreenParty
看板排序:
全部NTU-Archery378Agriculture315NTUHorti93115Plant93fruits75ASHS-93-li64Gossiping60Wargaming52NTUHorti9448NTU44NTUSA34NTUDormM733GreenParty25SMSlife25NTUHorti9723Ecophilia20orangegrass14NTUHorti9512studyabroad12freckles11Steam10TY_Research10NtuDormM19Shu-Lin9ShuangHe9SongShan9Wine9ac20068NTUHorti968NtuDormM57Calligraphy6NCHU-AGR066NTU_ART6NTUAviation6NTUChorus6NTUSG6AfterPhD5Bioindustry5cookclub5movie5regimen5cat4dog4NTUbus4TOEFL_iBT4DoubleMajor3graduate3HOT_Game3InlineSkate3l9763NCCU04_PSYCH3NTU-HTbasket3NTU_BOTDorm3NTUacadem3NtuDormM33VISA3Agronomy-932ASHS-94-ye2joke2MountainClub2NTU-K102Olympics_ISG2TizzyBac2uni-talk2Agri_Service1Agronomy1Agronomy-841Agronomy-861Agronomy-871Agronomy-881Agronomy-891Agronomy-921Agronomy-951Agronomy-961Agronomy-971AOE1ASHS1ASHS-921AU_Talk1B931010XX1B933021XX1B933023XX1B93303XXX1B93310XXX1B93A011XX1B93A012XX1B99303XXX1B99310XXX1Baseball1C_Sharp1ck_17_3011CYCU_MIS_93A1Epi-951Hakka-Dream1hc3141HCHS593051ID_Problem1image1INSECT-931KS95-3111KS98-3121LifeSci_931LoveLive1MINGDAO1NHCG1NTU-IEH951NTU-IPH951NTU-K61NTU-OMIH951NTU104thLIS1NTUAC931ntuACCT031ntuACCT971NTUACCTR1001NTUACCTR1011NTUACCTR1021NTUACCTR951NTUACCTR991NTUAL-ARCHER1NTUBA971NTUBP-R1001NTUBSE-B-931NTUBST931NTUBST981NTUCH-971NTUDormFJr1NTUDormM61NTUDrama931NTUE-DC991NTUEE1081NTUF-931NTUfin971Ntuflower1NTUHistory001NTUHistory931NTUIB971NTUIE971NTUJapan041NTULibrary1NTUMath931NTUMEB981NTUND981NTUPPM-931NTUPPM-961NTUSC1NTUScout1NTUST-TX-B921NTUSTfinM931NUU_Talk1paranormal1PCCU-CS1phys931phys981SoftTennis1SSSH-13th3141Statistics1TKU_CE94C1Transport1001TTU-talk1Wanhua1Warfare1<< 收起看板(161)
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁
1F→:我到想知道人有必要一直開發嗎?06/05 23:30
2F→:把真實的外部成本加入成本中 就像您所提到的方法06/05 23:31
3F→:但是困難的是 你怎麼知道真實的外部成本是多少?06/05 23:32
4F→:今日不認為有影響的 或許未來會發現很嚴重的後果06/05 23:32
5F→:這又要如何計價? 又要誰來負擔這些成本?06/05 23:33
6F→:經濟學能夠讓效益達到最高 卻沒辦法處理公不公平06/05 23:34
8F推:出生率下降搞不好就是反映土地撐不下去的警訊06/05 23:54
3F推:立委是人選出來的 你覺得要怎麼正視這個問題?06/18 21:55
4F→:他們不管這裡的討論是一回事06/18 21:56
5F→:這裡的討論是另一回事06/18 21:56
6F→:不可以因為前者而否定這裡討論的價值吧06/18 21:57
7F→:雖然沒有直接的否定 但是文章內容很顯然06/18 22:05
8F→:忽略了綠黨版的討論議題06/18 22:06
2F→:雖然他的文章非常非常非常...的不適合這個版06/18 21:49
3F→:但是我覺得有個版可以不受ptt那樣的規範06/18 21:50
4F→:能夠自由的發表文章 我覺得很可貴06/18 21:51
127F噓:06/17 13:31
128F→:06/17 13:31
129F→:06/17 13:31
130F→:06/17 13:31
131F→:06/17 13:31
132F→:06/17 13:31
133F噓:06/17 16:04
134F噓:06/17 22:09
135F噓:06/17 23:27
137F噓:06/18 06:28
138F噓:06/18 09:18
142F噓:06/19 15:33
143F→:稻草06/19 15:33
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁