作者查詢 / kimkim
作者 kimkim 在 PTT [ Stock ] 看板的留言(推文), 共45則
限定看板:Stock
看板排序:
全部HatePolitics2414Lawyer461Gossiping371NTU361CMWang308NY-Yankees228Fund141Tech_Job111home-sale109ForeignEX86CTS76happy-clan47JinYong47HCKuo45Stock45CFP42sex37Examination31Baseball28Boy-Girl26Salary24Old-Games20feminine_sex19MLB19Tsao19WuLing46-31718Lions11CLHu10medstudent10SuperStarAve10NHSH13th3059OIT_main9OSSTUDENT869China-Drama7Olympics_ISG7AllTogether6DPP6Employee6FTV6car5Whales5Cubs4KMT4pts4WuGu-BaLi4AfterPhD3GossipPicket3NTU_Beauty3Patent3PublicServan3RedSox3Violation3W-Philosophy3WarCraft3About_Life2Blue_Jays2CCF2ck60th3072Dodgers2Eagles2FJU-ACCR942FSHS-93-3102gallantry2KMU_CIA2Mariners2media-chaos2MIN-Twins2Nationals2NKFUST-CCE902NTPU-CSIE932NTUST-HC-952PCSH91_3052SMSlife2StupidClown2TigerBlue2TKU_EW94B2A-Rod1Angels1ASHS-93-li1Athletics1BabyBears1Braves1C_Chat1Cardinals1CGU_EE981CHING1cksh80th3171cksh84th3021Cobras1CPU_7511CSMU-MED901Datong1DC88-3231DeathNote1DigiCurrency1DirectSales1dlsh-7th-3031FCU_EE00B1FJU-EE-VLSI1FLAT_CLUB1GIEE_991GoldenEagles1Guardians1GuardRookies1HCHS603121HLHS_10thU1HRM1HSNU_10081HSNU_10631HSNU_10951Hunter1HY-40-Xin1ILSH-913111Indians1KOU1KS94-3021KS96-3141KS98-3021KSU1LAW1LifeSci_971LineageII1Management1MCU-LAW1Metal_kids1Military1money1movie1NCYU_AFL_961NDHU-phy971NDMC-P921North_Coast1NSYSU_EE95-11NTOU-MME-99B1NTU-EM921NTUST-EMA1NUK_AC981NUU-SHE-971NUU_Talk1NYUST98_FING1Orioles1pal1PDA1politics1PushDoll1Sabermetrics1Sanfu_Gutao1SCU-BM-93B1SCU_Law101B1SCU_Talk1SHU_IPR1soft_nuushe1specialman1SYSOP1TBBT1TFSHS68th3151THU-CHE931THU-His891THU-HIS971TryingTimes1TSSHS61th3241tzuchi1Viator96Gi1weiyin1WRADPE1YCSH_7_3131YP95-3111Yunlin1<< 收起看板(168)
1F→: 觀念錯誤 版上人人都是5千萬起跳的 當然不夠用01/16 11:15
5F推: 不是41億 是要再拿出70多億....12/03 17:45
7F→: 加上一開始付的擔保金就破百億了...12/03 17:46
250F推:看在股神加持下我套牢多年的東友會不會解套XD06/11 15:17
2F推:問題在於公務員所據以計算分回房地比例的鑑價報告12/24 14:55
3F→:是以倘若日勝生沒有以不法手段影響公務員12/24 14:55
4F→:那就是公務員自己的問題 火燒不到日勝生12/24 14:56
6F→:也很難據以說"因為我當初自己鑑價有問題 所以要重分"12/24 14:56
4F推:他大概是說頂尖豪宅吧10/08 15:59
8F推:台灣人短視近利不意外07/03 18:38
1F推:覺得疑惑+101/31 18:10
1F推:其實重點應該是沒有堅強的證據證明她有收到內線消息12/13 19:31
2F→:所謂的買了還沒賣只是判決或處分書中常見拿來加強12/13 19:32
4F→:論點使用的 換句話說那個理由是拿來點綴用的12/13 19:32
5F→:千萬別以為單單沒賣就不構成內線交易12/13 19:33
1F推:怒保1%12/10 09:08
1F推:減赤不等於還債11/07 16:02