作者查詢 / Fredericmo
作者 Fredericmo 在 PTT [ clmusic ] 看板的留言(推文), 共183則
限定看板:clmusic
看板排序:
全部piano714Hunter202clmusic183Gossiping133sex90LinKou89movie85clPianist50Musicteach42CCRomance34media-chaos26FuMouDiscuss20TOEIC20WomenTalk20joke17Kaohsiung13Salary12Tainan10CFP9TuCheng8Gantz6HRM6medstudent6NTU_BOTDorm6StarCraft6CultureShock5EngTalk5Examination5Feminism5NCCU5Google4NTUT_Talk4PttHistory4PttLifeLaw4Teacher4TigerBlue4tutor4ADS3cookclub3DPP3FLAT_CLUB3gay3HLHS_10thU3home-sale3homemaker3L_TalkandCha3LAW3NCCU02_TUR3NCCU_SEED3North_Coast3PCSH91_3053Post3PublicIssue3Sewing3specialman3Stock3toberich3translator3Warfare3Boy-Girl2Calligraphy2CCU_CSIE87u2Doraemon2Employee2FHSH-89-3162Finance2GreenParty2HCSHch13_3112HSNU_10372HSNU_8202L_PTTAvenue2LCD2LTK2Navy2NKUTEE2ONE_PIECE2PeopleSeries2ASHS-93-li1ASIA-uni1Aussiekiwi1B97A013XX1BCC_PCC1Beauty1beauty_south1BERSERK1biker1Bioindustry1car1CATCH1CCSH_88_3051CCSHwindband1CHI-JEN1ck_17_3011cksh81st3201CLHS-50-141CPU_FC7611CrossStrait1CSI1CSMU-HSA961CSMU-MSSW961CSMU-SO1CTSH963011CyberFormula1CYCU_MIS_93B1CYCU_Talk1DeathNote1Education1F_MED961Fallinlove1fastfood1FCSH_133101FCU_EE97A1Fei-Huang1feminine_sex1FJU-ACCR941FJU-LAW20101FJU-MBA961FJU_CA_991Food1FXM91-3291Gintama1GraduateCram1Heroes1HomeTeach1HSNU_10081HSNU_11091HSNU_9481ID_Multi1JOB-Hunting1Keelung1Kids_Sucker1KingdomHuang1KNU1kochikame1KOF1KOTDFansClub1KS95-3181learnyf1LePoete1lesbian1License1logic1LP_Daily1MartialArts1multi-lovers1MuscleBeach1NCCU04_AT-A1NCCU_mathG971NCHU-MEgradu1NCHU_CsHsnu1NCHUAGRMENBK1NCKU-physiol1NDHU_ACC_7th1NDMC-D621NTHU-MSE111NTHU_NVLab1NTU1NTU-Karate1NTU-OMIH951NtuDormM11NTUmed911NTUniNews1NTUPiano1NTUST-EMA1NYUST00_FING1NZJH_32TH3051Office1paranormal1Ptt-Charity1rent-exp1Road1RSSH92_3051SCU-EC-VB1SCU_JPOB1ServiceInfo1SRW1StudyGroup1studyteacher1Suckcomic1Supersnail1TA_AN1tabletennis1TAKESHI1Tech_Job1TFSHS68th3151TFSHS68th3211THU_Talk1TNFSH94011TNFSH96121TNFSH98th1wearefriends1YoungDotx31<< 收起看板(192)
13F推: 說到底要批評別人是可以,但應解釋其謬誤之處才算負責06/13 13:21
14F→: 如果沒有辦法立論辯證,就只是單純放砲,當然是不尊重06/13 13:23
15F→: 對於願意討論的人、被討論的人甚至是發言者都是失敬。06/13 13:24
16F→: 正因為批評容易、立論困難,所以我認為批評的言論須負06/13 13:26
17F→: 責解釋,而非要求別人對該批評言論立論反證,倒果為因06/13 13:28
18F推: 所以給五樓板友,不管是你批評沒有深度,或者是質疑別06/13 13:30
19F→: 人所體悟的深度何在,仍只是單方面的打擊他人而已,並06/13 13:32
20F→: 沒有解釋你自己的言論根據,這其實是你應該負責說明的06/13 13:33
21F→: 說沒時間或是其實說自己寫過辯證文,並不能解釋你批評06/13 13:34
22F→: 的道理,不論幾次,你說了,建議還是再好好地說明,不06/13 13:36
23F→: 是意氣之爭,而是表示你願意給予尊重。06/13 13:38
24F推: 不然說實在的,我也能說你的批評不著邊際,是無稽之談06/13 13:41
25F→: 然後要你自己去解釋自清,這樣合不合理呢?06/13 13:42
26F推: 如果可以解釋你認為演奏者沒有想法和品味是從何處得知06/13 13:46
27F→: 或者如何推演到你的結論,相信這樣超越演奏者能力的見06/13 13:46
28F→: 解(因為你說演奏者不具備,所以當然是指演奏者能力不06/13 13:47
29F→: 足),這樣有智慧的觀點必可造福更多愛樂者,先謝謝你了!06/13 13:48
57F→: 沒有更清楚,反而變得更模糊了。我對別人所說不感興趣06/14 02:44
58F→: 我只想知道你所說"一些德奧派色調上的變化與處理方式"06/14 02:45
59F→: 應該是怎樣的,而你又是從何判斷演奏者沒有足夠想法。06/14 02:46
60F→: "不論在節奏掌握或是顏色轉換" 你說少了深度,那必定06/14 02:49
61F→: 有你心中的對照組來比較而得,我想知道那標準的真相。06/14 02:50
14F推: 推用心!02/12 22:38
18F推:推!!!01/27 21:48
2F推:好文推!09/20 02:37
2F推:祝早日康復!!05/06 12:46
1F→:結果心肌梗塞...希望能早日康復05/18 19:52
2F→:推錯篇0r205/18 19:52
1F→:結果心肌梗塞...希望能早日康復05/18 19:52
1F推:1) K. Zimerman 2) A.B. Michelangeli 3) A. Brendel01/29 23:10
2F推:推!!10/07 00:33
5F推:去聽就對了XD 樓上各位要揪團嗎?05/30 23:36
7F推:套票當然是全包了 但還是可以揪團啊! 坐一起蠻有趣的06/01 00:29