作者查詢 / dreamysky

總覽項目：發文 | 留言 | 暱稱

作者 dreamysky 在 PTT [ GreenParty ] 看板的留言(推文), 共29則

限定看板：GreenParty

看板排序：

全部politics3283DPP1226L_SecretGard643basketballTW557NY-Yankees280HatePolitics209car186FORMULA1180Dragons171About_Life108Army-Sir96Germany72Japan_Travel71NCYU_DMI_9668Ind-travel60media-chaos60EuropeTravel53Pilots48PureYouth48MLB45Lakers37Baseball36GreenParty29BoardCourt27SoftbankHawk26Aviation19Motel17NDMC-M10514SYSOP12FubonBraves11TaiwanDa11Biotech9Japandrama9Mind9Softball8Bioindustry7NDMC-SoftB7FengYuan6Hotel6KMT6share6Elephants5NCYU_DMI_985TKU_EW94B5CarShop4DSLR4Gossiping4HateP_Picket4railtour4Beauty3Couchsurfing3DC3japanavgirls3JP_Custom3Key_Mou_Pad3NCYU_DMI_993Railway3RedSox3SBrightman3army_59-1T2Economics2HBL2hotspring2ID_Multi2KOU2LAW2NCCU05_RMI2NTUEtalk2Penpal2Rays2Singapore2SuperStarAve2A1-GP1AboutBoards1Actuary1Agronomy-871Bio-Job1CCJH-88g-3141cksh81st3161cksh84th3101CultureShock1CYCUEL95A1Deutsch1EAseries1Employee1EuropeanCar1FJU-LS1FLAT_CLUB1HCHS923161HCU_IMD_901HLHS_10thU1HSNU_8201Instant_Mess1JP_Entertain1JUST1KS96-3021kuninaka1LHU1Little-Games1Malaysia1MdnCNhistory1medstudent1MLBGAME1Motorsports1MRT1Music-WoW1MZ26th3041NCCU06_LawFl1NCCU06_LawHa1NCCU06_LawLt1NCCU07_BA1NCCU07_BANK1NCCU07_DIP1NCCU07_EA1NCCU07_HISTO1NCCU07_JAPAN1NCCU07_LAND1NCCU07_PSYCH1NCCU07_PSYGR1NCCU08_HISTO1NTHU_IEEM-951NtuDormF21NtuDormF31NTUDormF41NtuDormF51NtuDormM11NtuDormM31NtuDormM51NTUDormM61NTUDormM71NtuDormM81NTUfin001NTUHorti951NTUR961230XX1NTUST_Talk1NUK_EE100A1Office1Patent1pay_home1Physics1Policy1Post1prozac1PttLaw1Reds1RyokoHirosue1SFGiants1TA_AN1TFSHS65th3201TigerBlue1Tigers1Violation1Windows1YAKYU1YH33rd3191Yunlin1Yup01-041<< 收起看板(157)

首頁

尾頁

[轉錄][閒聊] 由日本核災看檢討核能

[ GreenParty ]41 留言, 推噓總分: +5

作者: william2001 - 發表於 2011/03/20 19:18(13年前)

6^F→dreamysky:VCCS別戴版工帽子...= =+03/18 21:26

13^F→dreamysky:我受傷的都沒算阿～大家都只算死亡人數03/18 21:50

15^F→dreamysky:那可以算算1986年至今因交通意外的總傷亡人數...03/18 22:00

16^F→dreamysky:我相信這是可以比較的...03/18 22:00

19^F→dreamysky:原來交通意外～不會是永久的，活下來的會好過03/18 22:03

22^F→dreamysky:『天天』發生的難道更不應該全面檢討？03/18 22:04

24^F→dreamysky:反而是不是『天天』的要停工檢討政策？= =a不懂！03/18 22:04

26^F→dreamysky:事實是，妳每天都在承受～只是劑量高低而已03/18 22:05

27^F→dreamysky:交通意外天天發生，居然願意承受在如此風險～騎車開車03/18 22:07

29^F→dreamysky:卻不願意承受不是天天發生的核能風險...我不懂～03/18 22:07

31^F→dreamysky:空污發生了劑量會比核災不嚴重嘛？= =a03/18 22:08

32^F→dreamysky:對阿～願意承受交通風險跟空污風險，這兩個死亡風險03/18 22:08

34^F→dreamysky:估算起來比核災風險大這麽多，卻願意承受～不懂03/18 22:09

35^F→dreamysky:意思就是，不管什麼的災變，空污不會核污嚴重...03/18 22:10

37^F→dreamysky:這下子是～會吵才有糖吃嘛？03/18 22:14

42^F→dreamysky:核污防治早就進行中，空污應變呢？一把火就可以大空污了03/18 22:17

44^F→dreamysky:願意承受空污的您，願意住火力發電廠下風處嘛？03/18 22:18

47^F→dreamysky:妳確定空污只是CO2?~呵呵03/18 22:19

49^F→dreamysky:那大概您還沒看到台灣核污～就先被空污煩死了吧...03/18 22:21

56^F→dreamysky:我只是覺得民眾的反核，是否是因為被鼓112.104.173.71 03/19 22:50

57^F→dreamysky:吹出來的...= =a112.104.173.71 03/19 22:50

70^F→dreamysky:雖然在政黑～但是內容是認真的！112.104.173.71 03/20 00:18

71^F→dreamysky:而且我不是護航，而是半昏迷大說得112.104.173.71 03/20 00:21

72^F→dreamysky:是否人民因為知道車禍的恐懼進而可以112.104.173.71 03/20 00:21

73^F→dreamysky:承受交通帶來的風險及污染災害112.104.173.71 03/20 00:22

74^F→dreamysky:可是對核能不瞭解，所以就反它呢？112.104.173.71 03/20 00:22

78^F→dreamysky:可是我不覺得交通意外是『小範圍』～112.104.173.71 03/20 00:29

83^F→dreamysky:所以不能忍受基因突變的可能性，可以忍112.104.173.71 03/20 00:41

84^F→dreamysky:受缺胳膊，少眼睛的後遺症嘛？= =a112.104.173.71 03/20 00:42

首頁

尾頁